* [PATCH] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
@ 2020-06-30 12:35 Michal Suchanek
2020-06-30 13:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchanek @ 2020-06-30 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nvdimm
Cc: Michal Suchanek, Mikulas Patocka, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara,
Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Pankaj Gupta,
Michael S. Tsirkin, Yuval Shaia, Cornelia Huck, Jakub Staron,
linux-kernel
The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
supplied as cache.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
index 30505d70f423..57b0a972f6fd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
@@ -2277,6 +2277,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
wc->memory_map_size -= (uint64_t)wc->start_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
+ r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
+ goto bad;
+ }
+
bio_list_init(&wc->flush_list);
wc->flush_thread = kthread_create(writecache_flush_thread, wc, "dm_writecache_flush");
if (IS_ERR(wc->flush_thread)) {
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 12:35 [PATCH] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem Michal Suchanek
@ 2020-06-30 13:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-30 14:10 ` Michal Suchánek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2020-06-30 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Suchanek
Cc: linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara, Alasdair Kergon,
Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Pankaj Gupta, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Yuval Shaia, Cornelia Huck, Jakub Staron, linux-kernel
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> supplied as cache.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> index 30505d70f423..57b0a972f6fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> @@ -2277,6 +2277,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
>
> wc->memory_map_size -= (uint64_t)wc->start_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>
> + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> + goto bad;
> + }
> +
> bio_list_init(&wc->flush_list);
> wc->flush_thread = kthread_create(writecache_flush_thread, wc, "dm_writecache_flush");
> if (IS_ERR(wc->flush_thread)) {
> --
Hi
Shouldn't this be in the "if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc))" block?
WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) retrurns true if we are using persistent memory as a
cache device, otherwise we are using generic block device as a cache
device.
Mikulas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 14:10 ` Michal Suchánek
@ 2020-06-30 13:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-30 14:43 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30 14:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Suchanek
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Snitzer @ 2020-06-30 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Suchánek
Cc: Mikulas Patocka, linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara,
Alasdair Kergon, dm-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin, Yuval Shaia,
Cornelia Huck, Jakub Staron, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 30 2020 at 10:10am -0400,
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:32:01AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > > The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> > > supplied as cache.
> > >
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> > > Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > > index 30505d70f423..57b0a972f6fd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > > @@ -2277,6 +2277,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> > >
> > > wc->memory_map_size -= (uint64_t)wc->start_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > >
> > > + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> > > + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> > > + goto bad;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > bio_list_init(&wc->flush_list);
> > > wc->flush_thread = kthread_create(writecache_flush_thread, wc, "dm_writecache_flush");
> > > if (IS_ERR(wc->flush_thread)) {
> > > --
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Shouldn't this be in the "if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc))" block?
> That should be always the case at this point.
> >
> > WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) retrurns true if we are using persistent memory as a
> > cache device, otherwise we are using generic block device as a cache
> > device.
>
> This is to prevent the situation where we have WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) but
> cannot guarantee consistency because the async flush is not handled.
The writecache operates in 2 modes. SSD or PMEM. Mikulas is saying
your dax_synchronous() check should go within a WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) block
because it doesn't make sense to do the check when in SSD mode.
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 13:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
@ 2020-06-30 14:10 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30 13:36 ` Mike Snitzer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchánek @ 2020-06-30 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka
Cc: linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara, Alasdair Kergon,
Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Pankaj Gupta, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Yuval Shaia, Cornelia Huck, Jakub Staron, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:32:01AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> > The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> > supplied as cache.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> > Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > index 30505d70f423..57b0a972f6fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > @@ -2277,6 +2277,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> >
> > wc->memory_map_size -= (uint64_t)wc->start_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> >
> > + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> > + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> > + goto bad;
> > + }
> > +
> > bio_list_init(&wc->flush_list);
> > wc->flush_thread = kthread_create(writecache_flush_thread, wc, "dm_writecache_flush");
> > if (IS_ERR(wc->flush_thread)) {
> > --
>
> Hi
>
> Shouldn't this be in the "if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc))" block?
That should be always the case at this point.
>
> WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) retrurns true if we are using persistent memory as a
> cache device, otherwise we are using generic block device as a cache
> device.
This is to prevent the situation where we have WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) but
cannot guarantee consistency because the async flush is not handled.
Thanks
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 13:36 ` Mike Snitzer
@ 2020-06-30 14:43 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30 14:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Suchanek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchánek @ 2020-06-30 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Snitzer
Cc: Mikulas Patocka, linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara,
Alasdair Kergon, dm-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin, Yuval Shaia,
Cornelia Huck, Jakub Staron, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:36:33AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30 2020 at 10:10am -0400,
> Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:32:01AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > >
> > > > The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> > > > supplied as cache.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> > > > Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > > > index 30505d70f423..57b0a972f6fd 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > > > @@ -2277,6 +2277,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> > > >
> > > > wc->memory_map_size -= (uint64_t)wc->start_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > > >
> > > > + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> > > > + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> > > > + goto bad;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > bio_list_init(&wc->flush_list);
> > > > wc->flush_thread = kthread_create(writecache_flush_thread, wc, "dm_writecache_flush");
> > > > if (IS_ERR(wc->flush_thread)) {
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be in the "if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc))" block?
> > That should be always the case at this point.
> > >
> > > WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) retrurns true if we are using persistent memory as a
> > > cache device, otherwise we are using generic block device as a cache
> > > device.
> >
> > This is to prevent the situation where we have WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) but
> > cannot guarantee consistency because the async flush is not handled.
>
> The writecache operates in 2 modes. SSD or PMEM. Mikulas is saying
> your dax_synchronous() check should go within a WC_MODE_PMEM(wc) block
> because it doesn't make sense to do the check when in SSD mode.
Indeed, it's in the wrong if/else branch.
Thanks
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 13:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-30 14:43 ` Michal Suchánek
@ 2020-06-30 14:53 ` Michal Suchanek
2020-06-30 15:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchanek @ 2020-06-30 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Michal Suchanek, Mikulas Patocka, linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V,
Jan Kara, Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Yuval Shaia,
Dan Williams, Cornelia Huck, Pankaj Gupta, Jakub Staron,
linux-kernel
The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
supplied as cache.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
index 30505d70f423..1e4f37249e28 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
@@ -2271,6 +2271,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
ti->error = "Unable to map persistent memory for cache";
goto bad;
}
+
+ if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
+ r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
+ goto bad;
+ }
} else {
size_t n_blocks, n_metadata_blocks;
uint64_t n_bitmap_bits;
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 14:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Suchanek
@ 2020-06-30 15:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-30 15:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Michal Suchanek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2020-06-30 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Suchanek
Cc: linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara, Alasdair Kergon,
Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Yuval Shaia, Dan Williams, Cornelia Huck,
Pankaj Gupta, Jakub Staron, linux-kernel
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> supplied as cache.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
OK. I suggest to move this test before persistent_memory_claim (so that
you don't try to map the whole device).
Mikulas
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> index 30505d70f423..1e4f37249e28 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> @@ -2271,6 +2271,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> ti->error = "Unable to map persistent memory for cache";
> goto bad;
> }
> +
> + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> + goto bad;
> + }
> } else {
> size_t n_blocks, n_metadata_blocks;
> uint64_t n_bitmap_bits;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 15:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
@ 2020-06-30 15:49 ` Michal Suchanek
2020-06-30 16:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchanek @ 2020-06-30 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka
Cc: Michal Suchanek, linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara,
Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Jakub Staron,
Michael S. Tsirkin, Dan Williams, Yuval Shaia, Cornelia Huck,
linux-kernel
The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
supplied as cache.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
index 30505d70f423..5358894bb9fd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
@@ -2266,6 +2266,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
}
if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc)) {
+ if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
+ r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
+ goto bad;
+ }
+
r = persistent_memory_claim(wc);
if (r) {
ti->error = "Unable to map persistent memory for cache";
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 15:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Michal Suchanek
@ 2020-06-30 16:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-30 16:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2020-06-30 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Suchanek
Cc: linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara, Alasdair Kergon,
Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Jakub Staron, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Dan Williams, Yuval Shaia, Cornelia Huck, linux-kernel
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> supplied as cache.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
Acked-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> index 30505d70f423..5358894bb9fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> @@ -2266,6 +2266,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> }
>
> if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc)) {
> + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> + goto bad;
> + }
> +
> r = persistent_memory_claim(wc);
> if (r) {
> ti->error = "Unable to map persistent memory for cache";
> --
> 2.26.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem.
2020-06-30 16:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
@ 2020-06-30 16:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2020-06-30 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Suchanek
Cc: linux-nvdimm, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Jan Kara, Alasdair Kergon,
Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Jakub Staron, Michael S. Tsirkin,
Dan Williams, Yuval Shaia, Cornelia Huck, linux-kernel
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> > The writecache driver does not handle asynchronous pmem. Reject it when
> > supplied as cache.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87lfk5hahc.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
> > Fixes: 6e84200c0a29 ("virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
>
> Acked-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
BTW, we should also add
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.3+
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > index 30505d70f423..5358894bb9fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > @@ -2266,6 +2266,12 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> > }
> >
> > if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc)) {
> > + if (!dax_synchronous(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev)) {
> > + r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + ti->error = "Asynchronous persistent memory not supported as pmem cache";
> > + goto bad;
> > + }
> > +
> > r = persistent_memory_claim(wc);
> > if (r) {
> > ti->error = "Unable to map persistent memory for cache";
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-30 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-30 12:35 [PATCH] dm writecache: reject asynchronous pmem Michal Suchanek
2020-06-30 13:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-30 14:10 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30 13:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-30 14:43 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30 14:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Suchanek
2020-06-30 15:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-30 15:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Michal Suchanek
2020-06-30 16:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-30 16:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).