From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: TDP level cleanups and shadow NPT fix
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:41:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716034122.5998-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
The primary purpose of this series is to implement a suggestion from Paolo
to have the MMU make the decision between 4 and 5 level EPT/TDP (when
5-level page tables are supported). Having the MMU "own" the decision of
whether or not to use 5-level paging leads to a variety of nice cleanups,
and ultimately gets rid of another kvm_x86_ops.
Patch 1 is a fix for SVM's shadow NPT that is compile tested only. I
don't know enough about the shadow NPT details to know if it's a "real"
bug or just a supericial oddity that can't actually cause problems.
"Remove temporary WARN on expected vs. actual EPTP level mismatch" could
easily be squashed with "Pull the PGD's level from the MMU instead of
recalculating it", I threw it in as a separate patch to provide a
bisection helper in case things go sideways.
Sean Christopherson (9):
KVM: nSVM: Correctly set the shadow NPT root level in its MMU role
KVM: x86/mmu: Add separate helper for shadow NPT root page role calc
KVM: VMX: Drop a duplicate declaration of construct_eptp()
KVM: VMX: Make vmx_load_mmu_pgd() static
KVM: x86: Pull the PGD's level from the MMU instead of recalculating
it
KVM: VXM: Remove temporary WARN on expected vs. actual EPTP level
mismatch
KVM: x86: Dynamically calculate TDP level from max level and
MAXPHYADDR
KVM: x86/mmu: Rename max_page_level to max_huge_page_level
KVM: x86: Specify max TDP level via kvm_configure_mmu()
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 ++---
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 --
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 10 ++++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 8 ++---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 31 +++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 6 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 -
10 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
--
2.26.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-16 3:41 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: nSVM: Correctly set the shadow NPT root level in its MMU role Sean Christopherson
2020-07-22 17:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Add separate helper for shadow NPT root page role calc Sean Christopherson
2020-07-22 17:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: VMX: Drop a duplicate declaration of construct_eptp() Sean Christopherson
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: VMX: Make vmx_load_mmu_pgd() static Sean Christopherson
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: Pull the PGD's level from the MMU instead of recalculating it Sean Christopherson
2020-07-22 17:11 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-07-31 16:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: VXM: Remove temporary WARN on expected vs. actual EPTP level mismatch Sean Christopherson
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: Dynamically calculate TDP level from max level and MAXPHYADDR Sean Christopherson
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename max_page_level to max_huge_page_level Sean Christopherson
2020-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: Specify max TDP level via kvm_configure_mmu() Sean Christopherson
2020-07-30 22:18 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: TDP level cleanups and shadow NPT fix Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200716034122.5998-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).