* net: decnet: TODO Items
@ 2020-07-17 6:18 Suraj Upadhyay
2020-07-19 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suraj Upadhyay @ 2020-07-17 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, kuba; +Cc: linux-decnet-user, netdev, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --]
Hi Maintainers and Developers,
I am interested in the DECnet TODO list.
I just need a quick response whether they are worth doing or not
for the amount of development happening in this subsystem is extremely
low and I can't help but question whether I should indulge in any of
the listed works or not.
Thanks,
Suraj Upadhyay.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: net: decnet: TODO Items
2020-07-17 6:18 net: decnet: TODO Items Suraj Upadhyay
@ 2020-07-19 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-19 17:35 ` Suraj Upadhyay
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2020-07-19 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suraj Upadhyay; +Cc: davem, kuba, linux-decnet-user, netdev, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 548 bytes --]
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:48:16 +0530
Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Maintainers and Developers,
> I am interested in the DECnet TODO list.
> I just need a quick response whether they are worth doing or not
> for the amount of development happening in this subsystem is extremely
> low and I can't help but question whether I should indulge in any of
> the listed works or not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Suraj Upadhyay.
>
The was a push to move decnet into staging and kill it.
But last time there were still some users.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: net: decnet: TODO Items
2020-07-19 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2020-07-19 17:35 ` Suraj Upadhyay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suraj Upadhyay @ 2020-07-19 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: davem, kuba, linux-decnet-user, netdev, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:48:16 +0530
> Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maintainers and Developers,
> > I am interested in the DECnet TODO list.
> > I just need a quick response whether they are worth doing or not
> > for the amount of development happening in this subsystem is extremely
> > low and I can't help but question whether I should indulge in any of
> > the listed works or not.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Suraj Upadhyay.
> >
>
> The was a push to move decnet into staging and kill it.
> But last time there were still some users.
It's understandable that it has grown obsolete now.
Thanks for your response.
Suraj Upadhyay.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-19 17:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-17 6:18 net: decnet: TODO Items Suraj Upadhyay
2020-07-19 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-19 17:35 ` Suraj Upadhyay
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).