linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: kworker/0:3+pm hogging CPU
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:58:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720135857.GB1228057@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720083956.GA4074@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:39:56AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not sure when this started happening but at least 5.6, 5.7 and
> 5.8-rc6 all exhibit this problem. Please note that the this is happining
> on a laptop which is not completely healthy. The BIOS complains that the
> Battery cannot be charged because the power supply cannot be recognized.
> This is somehting I have for a longer time without noticing the
> kworker/0:3+pm problem so I do not think they are related but who knows.
> 
> Anyway, kworker/0:3+pm is hogging CPU. /proc/<pid>/0:3+pm is very often
> empty so I suspect it just schedules very often and performs only small
> amount of work. Here are few backtraces I've managed to catch
> 
> [<0>] preempt_schedule_thunk+0x16/0x18
> [<0>] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x686/0x773
> [<0>] usb_start_wait_urb+0x59/0xc8
> [<0>] usb_control_msg+0xd4/0x10d
> [<0>] get_port_status+0x51/0x6f
> [<0>] hub_port_status+0x41/0xa3
> [<0>] hub_activate+0x230/0x4ee
> [<0>] hub_resume+0x20/0x9a
> [<0>] usb_resume_interface.isra.0+0xb0/0xd0
> [<0>] usb_suspend_both+0xf6/0x20c
> [<0>] usb_runtime_suspend+0x32/0x62
> [<0>] __rpm_callback+0x70/0xd4
> [<0>] rpm_callback+0x55/0x6b
> [<0>] rpm_suspend+0x2af/0x440
> [<0>] __pm_runtime_suspend+0x48/0x62
> [<0>] usb_runtime_idle+0x26/0x2d
> [<0>] __rpm_callback+0x70/0xd4
> [<0>] rpm_idle+0x179/0x1df
> [<0>] pm_runtime_work+0x6b/0x81
> [<0>] process_one_work+0x1bd/0x2c6
> [<0>] worker_thread+0x19c/0x240
> [<0>] kthread+0x11b/0x123
> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> 
> [<0>] slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x15/0x46
> [<0>] __kmalloc+0x148/0x15a
> [<0>] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x5c6/0x773
> [<0>] usb_start_wait_urb+0x59/0xc8
> [<0>] usb_control_msg+0xd4/0x10d
> [<0>] get_port_status+0x51/0x6f
> [<0>] hub_port_status+0x41/0xa3
> [<0>] hub_activate+0x230/0x4ee
> [<0>] hub_resume+0x20/0x9a
> [<0>] usb_resume_interface.isra.0+0xb0/0xd0
> [<0>] usb_suspend_both+0xf6/0x20c
> 
> [<0>] slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x15/0x46
> [<0>] __kmalloc+0x148/0x15a
> [<0>] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x5c6/0x773
> [<0>] usb_start_wait_urb+0x59/0xc8
> [<0>] usb_control_msg+0xd4/0x10d
> [<0>] set_port_feature+0x33/0x38
> [<0>] hub_suspend+0x15c/0x16a
> [<0>] usb_suspend_both+0x91/0x20c
> [<0>] usb_runtime_suspend+0x32/0x62
> [<0>] __rpm_callback+0x70/0xd4
> [<0>] rpm_callback+0x55/0x6b
> [<0>] rpm_suspend+0x2af/0x440
> [<0>] __pm_runtime_suspend+0x48/0x62
> [<0>] usb_runtime_idle+0x26/0x2d
> [<0>] __rpm_callback+0x70/0xd4
> [<0>] rpm_idle+0x179/0x1df
> [<0>] pm_runtime_work+0x6b/0x81
> [<0>] process_one_work+0x1bd/0x2c6
> [<0>] worker_thread+0x19c/0x240
> [<0>] kthread+0x11b/0x123
> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> 
> Is this something known or something I can give more information about?
> From a very quick look into the code it sounds as if the system wanted
> to suspend an USB device/controller but that keeps failing again and
> again.

Yes, that's what it looks like to me too.  Or maybe the suspend succeeds 
but then the device/controller immediately gets woken up again.

Can you provide the contents of /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices and also a 
usbmon trace showing a few rounds of this recurring activity?  Perhaps a 
section of the dmesg log with dynamic debugging enabled for the usbcore 
module, as well.

Alan Stern

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-20 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20  8:39 kworker/0:3+pm hogging CPU Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 13:58 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2020-07-20 14:32   ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 15:12     ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 16:33       ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 17:38         ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 17:45           ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 17:48             ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 18:16               ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 20:02                 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-21  5:59                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-21 14:33                     ` Alan Stern
2020-07-21 16:00                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-21 16:14                         ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29  9:50                       ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2020-08-29 15:59                         ` Alan Stern
2020-08-31 11:37                           ` Mathias Nyman
2020-09-01 15:27                             ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-04 15:57                               ` Dirk Kostrewa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200720135857.GB1228057@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).