From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dirk Kostrewa <dirk.kostrewa@mailbox.org>
Subject: Re: kworker/0:3+pm hogging CPU
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:59:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200829155949.GA499295@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200829095003.GA2446485@eldamar.local>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> I'm following up on this thread because a user in Debian (Dirk, Cc'ed)
> as well encountered the same/similar issue:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:33:25AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:59:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > Sorry, my mistake. The module name needs to be "xhci_hcd" with an '_'
> > > > character, not a '-' character -- the same as what shows up in the lsmod
> > > > output.
> > >
> > >
> > > [14766.973734] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-1 read: 0xe000088, return 0x88
> > > [14766.973738] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-2 read: 0xe000088, return 0x88
> > > [14766.973742] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-3 read: 0xe0002a0, return 0x2a0
> > > [14766.973746] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-4 read: 0xe0002a0, return 0x2a0
> > > [14766.973750] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-5 read: 0xe0002a0, return 0x2a0
> > > [14766.973754] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-6 read: 0xe0002a0, return 0x2a0
> > > [14766.973759] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-1 read: 0xe000088, return 0x88
> > > [14766.973763] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 2-2 read: 0xe000088, return 0x88
> >
> > According to the xHCI specification, those 02a0 values are normal and
> > the 0088 values indicate the port is disabled and has an over-current
> > condition. I don't know about the e000 bits in the upper part of the
> > word; according to my copy of the spec those bits should be 0.
> >
> > If your machine has only two physical SuperSpeed (USB-3) ports then
> > perhaps the other four ports are internally wired in a way that creates
> > a permanent over-current indication.
> >
> > > [14766.973771] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: set port remote wake mask, actual port 0 status = 0xe000088
> > > [14766.973780] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: set port remote wake mask, actual port 1 status = 0xe000088
> > > [14766.973789] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: set port remote wake mask, actual port 2 status = 0xe0002a0
> > > [14766.973798] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: set port remote wake mask, actual port 3 status = 0xe0002a0
> > > [14766.973807] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: set port remote wake mask, actual port 4 status = 0xe0002a0
> > > [14766.973816] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: set port remote wake mask, actual port 5 status = 0xe0002a0
> > > [14766.973830] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Bus suspend bailout, port over-current detected
> > >
> > > Repeating again and again. The last message suggests a HW problem? But
> > > why does the kernel try the same thing over and over?
> >
> > Because over-current is supposed to be a transient condition that goes
> > away quickly. It means there's a short circuit or something similar.
>
> Dirk exprienced the same issue aand enabled dynamic debugging showed
> similar pattern. His dmesg excerpt is attached.
>
> The Debian report is at https://bugs.debian.org/966703
>
> What could be tracked down is that the issue is uncovered since
> e9fb08d617bf ("xhci: prevent bus suspend if a roothub port detected a
> over-current condition") which was applied in 5.7-rc3 and backported
> to several stable releases (v5.6.8, v5.4.36 and v4.19.119).
>
> Dirk found additionally:
>
> > I just found out, that if none of the two USB ports is connected, there
> > are two kworker processes with permanently high CPU load, if one USB
> > port is connected and the other not, there is one such kworker process,
> > and if both USB ports are connected, there is no kworker process with
> > high CPU load.
> > I think, this supports your suspicion that these kworker processes are
> > connected with the overcurrent condition for both USB ports that I also
> > see in the dmesg output.
>
> Reverting the above commit covers the problem again. But I'm not
> exprienced enough here to claim if this is a HW issue or if the Kernel
> should handle the situation otherwise. Is there anything else Dirk can
> provide?
It is undoubtedly a hardware issue. The dmesg extract shows that ports
1-10, 1-11, and 2-5 (which is probably the same port as one of the
others) have overcurrent conditions; I'm guessing that these are the
ports which have external connections.
What were the devices Dirk plugged in that got rid of the kworker
processes? In particular, were they USB-2 or USB-3? (The dmesg log for
when the devices were first attached can answer these questions.)
As far as I know, there is no way for the kernel to work around this
problem. Preventing the controller from going into runtime suspend is
probably the best solution.
Perhaps Mathias (the xhci-hcd maintainer) will have more suggestions.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-29 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 8:39 kworker/0:3+pm hogging CPU Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 13:58 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 14:32 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 15:12 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 16:33 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 17:38 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 17:45 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 17:48 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-20 18:16 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-20 20:02 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-21 5:59 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-21 14:33 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-21 16:00 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-21 16:14 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29 9:50 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2020-08-29 15:59 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2020-08-31 11:37 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-09-01 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-04 15:57 ` Dirk Kostrewa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200829155949.GA499295@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=dirk.kostrewa@mailbox.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).