[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: delete repeated words in comments

[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: delete repeated words in comments

[Randy Dunlap]

Drop the repeated words {that, the} in comments.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
---
 sound/soc/sof/intel/cnl.c |    2 +-
 sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-next-20200807.orig/sound/soc/sof/intel/cnl.c
+++ linux-next-20200807/sound/soc/sof/intel/cnl.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int cnl_ipc_send_msg(struct snd_s
 	 * IPCs are sent at a high-rate. mod_delayed_work()
 	 * modifies the timer if the work is pending.
 	 * Also, a new delayed work should not be queued after the
-	 * the CTX_SAVE IPC, which is sent before the DSP enters D3.
+	 * CTX_SAVE IPC, which is sent before the DSP enters D3.
 	 */
 	if (hdr->cmd != (SOF_IPC_GLB_PM_MSG | SOF_IPC_PM_CTX_SAVE))
 		mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &hdev->d0i3_work,
--- linux-next-20200807.orig/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c
+++ linux-next-20200807/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ bool snd_sof_dsp_only_d0i3_compatible_st
 				continue;
 
 			/*
-			 * substream->runtime being not NULL indicates that
+			 * substream->runtime being not NULL indicates
 			 * that the stream is open. No need to check the
 			 * stream state.
 			 */

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: delete repeated words in comments

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

On 8/7/20 8:21 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Drop the repeated words {that, the} in comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>

Thanks Randy.

> ---
>   sound/soc/sof/intel/cnl.c |    2 +-
>   sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c |    2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20200807.orig/sound/soc/sof/intel/cnl.c
> +++ linux-next-20200807/sound/soc/sof/intel/cnl.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int cnl_ipc_send_msg(struct snd_s
>   	 * IPCs are sent at a high-rate. mod_delayed_work()
>   	 * modifies the timer if the work is pending.
>   	 * Also, a new delayed work should not be queued after the
> -	 * the CTX_SAVE IPC, which is sent before the DSP enters D3.
> +	 * CTX_SAVE IPC, which is sent before the DSP enters D3.
>   	 */
>   	if (hdr->cmd != (SOF_IPC_GLB_PM_MSG | SOF_IPC_PM_CTX_SAVE))
>   		mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &hdev->d0i3_work,
> --- linux-next-20200807.orig/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c
> +++ linux-next-20200807/sound/soc/sof/sof-audio.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ bool snd_sof_dsp_only_d0i3_compatible_st
>   				continue;
>   
>   			/*
> -			 * substream->runtime being not NULL indicates that
> +			 * substream->runtime being not NULL indicates
>   			 * that the stream is open. No need to check the
>   			 * stream state.
>   			 */
> 

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: delete repeated words in comments

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:21:56 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Drop the repeated words {that, the} in comments.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: delete repeated words in comments
      commit: 8932f0cb20e815478a5aaa6ff2850ff25f10a2fe

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark