linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation
@ 2020-08-20  2:56 Libing Zhou
  2020-08-31  7:02 ` Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
  2020-10-01 12:46 ` [tip: x86/misc] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle() " tip-bot2 for Libing Zhou
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Libing Zhou @ 2020-08-20  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, bp, x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, libing.zhou, hpa

In nmi_check_duration(), the 'whole_msecs' value get from
'action->max_duration' is wrong.

Fixes: 248ed51048c4 ("x86/nmi: Remove irq_work from the long duration NMI handler")
Signed-off-by: Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
---
v2:
Change solution as peterz@infradead.org suggested.

 arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
index 4fc9954a9560..47381666d6a5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ fs_initcall(nmi_warning_debugfs);
 
 static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
 {
-	u64 whole_msecs = READ_ONCE(action->max_duration);
 	int remainder_ns, decimal_msecs;
 
 	if (duration < nmi_longest_ns || duration < action->max_duration)
@@ -110,12 +109,12 @@ static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
 
 	action->max_duration = duration;
 
-	remainder_ns = do_div(whole_msecs, (1000 * 1000));
+	remainder_ns = do_div(duration, (1000 * 1000));
 	decimal_msecs = remainder_ns / 1000;
 
 	printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
 		"INFO: NMI handler (%ps) took too long to run: %lld.%03d msecs\n",
-		action->handler, whole_msecs, decimal_msecs);
+		action->handler, duration, decimal_msecs);
 }
 
 static int nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs)
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation
  2020-08-20  2:56 [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation Libing Zhou
@ 2020-08-31  7:02 ` Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
  2020-10-01 12:46 ` [tip: x86/misc] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle() " tip-bot2 for Libing Zhou
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) @ 2020-08-31  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, tglx, mingo, bp, bp, x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa

Hi,

Any comment on this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com> 
Sent: 2020年8月20日 10:57
To: peterz@infradead.org; tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; bp@suse.de; x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>; hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation

In nmi_check_duration(), the 'whole_msecs' value get from 'action->max_duration' is wrong.

Fixes: 248ed51048c4 ("x86/nmi: Remove irq_work from the long duration NMI handler")
Signed-off-by: Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
---
v2:
Change solution as peterz@infradead.org suggested.

 arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index 4fc9954a9560..47381666d6a5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ fs_initcall(nmi_warning_debugfs);
 
 static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)  {
-	u64 whole_msecs = READ_ONCE(action->max_duration);
 	int remainder_ns, decimal_msecs;
 
 	if (duration < nmi_longest_ns || duration < action->max_duration) @@ -110,12 +109,12 @@ static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
 
 	action->max_duration = duration;
 
-	remainder_ns = do_div(whole_msecs, (1000 * 1000));
+	remainder_ns = do_div(duration, (1000 * 1000));
 	decimal_msecs = remainder_ns / 1000;
 
 	printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
 		"INFO: NMI handler (%ps) took too long to run: %lld.%03d msecs\n",
-		action->handler, whole_msecs, decimal_msecs);
+		action->handler, duration, decimal_msecs);
 }
 
 static int nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs)
--
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [tip: x86/misc] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle() duration miscalculation
  2020-08-20  2:56 [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation Libing Zhou
  2020-08-31  7:02 ` Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
@ 2020-10-01 12:46 ` tip-bot2 for Libing Zhou
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Libing Zhou @ 2020-10-01 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel),
	Libing Zhou, Borislav Petkov, Changbin Du, x86, LKML

The following commit has been merged into the x86/misc branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     f94c91f7ba3ba7de2bc8aa31be28e1abb22f849e
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/f94c91f7ba3ba7de2bc8aa31be28e1abb22f849e
Author:        Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:56:41 +08:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CommitterDate: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:42:08 +02:00

x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle() duration miscalculation

When nmi_check_duration() is checking the time an NMI handler took to
execute, the whole_msecs value used should be read from the @duration
argument, not from the ->max_duration, the latter being used to store
the current maximal duration.

 [ bp: Rewrite commit message. ]

Fixes: 248ed51048c4 ("x86/nmi: Remove irq_work from the long duration NMI handler")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200820025641.44075-1-libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com
---
 arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
index 4fc9954..4738166 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ fs_initcall(nmi_warning_debugfs);
 
 static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
 {
-	u64 whole_msecs = READ_ONCE(action->max_duration);
 	int remainder_ns, decimal_msecs;
 
 	if (duration < nmi_longest_ns || duration < action->max_duration)
@@ -110,12 +109,12 @@ static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
 
 	action->max_duration = duration;
 
-	remainder_ns = do_div(whole_msecs, (1000 * 1000));
+	remainder_ns = do_div(duration, (1000 * 1000));
 	decimal_msecs = remainder_ns / 1000;
 
 	printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
 		"INFO: NMI handler (%ps) took too long to run: %lld.%03d msecs\n",
-		action->handler, whole_msecs, decimal_msecs);
+		action->handler, duration, decimal_msecs);
 }
 
 static int nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs)

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-01 12:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-20  2:56 [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation Libing Zhou
2020-08-31  7:02 ` Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
2020-10-01 12:46 ` [tip: x86/misc] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle() " tip-bot2 for Libing Zhou

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).