From: peterz@infradead.org
To: "Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:21:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826092113.GS35926@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826090102.GC1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:01:02AM +0200, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> Known broken archs include: Sparc32-SMP, PARISC, ARC-v1-SMP.
> There might be a few more, but I've forgotten.
Note that none of those actually have NMIs and llist is mostly OK on
those architectures too.
The problem is when you combine cmpxchg() with regular stores and
llist() doesn't do that.
The only architectures that have NMIs are: ARM, ARM64, POWERPC, s390,
SH, SPARC64, X86 and XTENSA and all of them have sane atomic ops.
(XTENSA is tricky, because it looks like it has parts that don't have
sane atomics, but I _think_ those parts also don't have NMI)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 12:02 x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint) Eddy_Wu
2020-08-24 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-24 16:18 ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-24 18:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 7:36 ` peterz
2020-08-24 15:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-24 16:41 ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-25 6:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 8:33 ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-25 11:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Fixes NMI context check on x86 kernel test robot
2020-08-25 12:09 ` x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint) peterz
2020-08-25 13:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 13:30 ` peterz
2020-08-25 13:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 14:15 ` peterz
2020-08-25 14:10 ` peterz
2020-08-25 14:19 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-27 9:02 ` peterz
2020-08-26 7:07 ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-26 8:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26 9:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26 10:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26 10:25 ` peterz
2020-08-26 13:36 ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-26 13:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26 9:01 ` peterz
2020-08-26 9:21 ` peterz [this message]
2020-08-26 8:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 12:20 ` [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Fixes NMI context check on x86 kernel test robot
2020-08-25 12:25 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200826092113.GS35926@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).