linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com>
To: "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "mhiramat@kernel.org" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:36:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42c65d9e434945c183ead8bef3d89de2@trendmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826102545.GF1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: peterz@infradead.org <peterz@infradead.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 6:26 PM
> To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Eddy Wu (RD-TW) <Eddy_Wu@trendmicro.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:00:41PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Of course, this doesn't solve the llist_del_first() contention in the
> > pre_kretprobe_handler(). So anyway we need a lock for per-probe llist
> > (if I understand llist.h comment correctly.)
>
> Bah, lemme think about that. Kprobes really shouldn't be using locks :/

Maybe we can have per-cpu free list for retprobe_instance?
This ensure we only have one user requesting free instance at a time, given that pre_kretprobe_handler() wont recursive.

We may be wasting memory if target function perfer some cpu though.


TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE

The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.

For details about what personal information we collect and why, please see our Privacy Notice on our website at: Read privacy policy<http://www.trendmicro.com/privacy>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24 12:02 x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint) Eddy_Wu
2020-08-24 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-24 16:18   ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-24 18:15   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25  7:36     ` peterz
2020-08-24 15:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-24 16:41   ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-25  6:15     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25  8:33       ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-25 11:06       ` [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Fixes NMI context check on x86 kernel test robot
2020-08-25 12:09       ` x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint) peterz
2020-08-25 13:15         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 13:30           ` peterz
2020-08-25 13:59             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 14:15               ` peterz
2020-08-25 14:10             ` peterz
2020-08-25 14:19               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-27  9:02           ` peterz
2020-08-26  7:07         ` Eddy_Wu
2020-08-26  8:22           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26  9:06             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26 10:00               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26 10:25                 ` peterz
2020-08-26 13:36                   ` Eddy_Wu [this message]
2020-08-26 13:51                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-26  9:01           ` peterz
2020-08-26  9:21             ` peterz
2020-08-26  8:31         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-08-25 12:20       ` [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Fixes NMI context check on x86 kernel test robot
2020-08-25 12:25       ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42c65d9e434945c183ead8bef3d89de2@trendmicro.com \
    --to=eddy_wu@trendmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).