linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RESEND] smsc9420: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
@ 2020-09-03 20:10 Christophe JAILLET
  2020-09-03 23:54 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2020-09-03 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, kuba, steve.glendinning
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Christophe JAILLET

The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.

The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
It has been compile tested.

When memory is allocated in 'smsc9420_probe()', GFP_KERNEL can be used
because it is a probe function and no lock is acquired.

While at it, rewrite the size passed to 'dma_alloc_coherent()' the same way
as the one passed to 'dma_free_coherent()'. This form is less verbose:
   sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * RX_RING_SIZE +
   sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * TX_RING_SIZE,
vs
   sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE)


@@
@@
-    PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
+    DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL

@@
@@
-    PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
+    DMA_TO_DEVICE

@@
@@
-    PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
+    DMA_FROM_DEVICE

@@
@@
-    PCI_DMA_NONE
+    DMA_NONE

@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
-    pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
-    pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
@@
-    pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
+    dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
-    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+    dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)

@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
-    pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
+    dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)

@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
-    pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+    dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)

@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
-    pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+    dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
   https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4

RESEND because it was previously sent when the branch was closed
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c | 51 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c
index 42bef04d65ba..68969549a5c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c
@@ -497,8 +497,9 @@ static void smsc9420_free_tx_ring(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd)
 
 		if (skb) {
 			BUG_ON(!pd->tx_buffers[i].mapping);
-			pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->tx_buffers[i].mapping,
-					 skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+			dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev,
+					 pd->tx_buffers[i].mapping, skb->len,
+					 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
 		}
 
@@ -530,8 +531,9 @@ static void smsc9420_free_rx_ring(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd)
 			dev_kfree_skb_any(pd->rx_buffers[i].skb);
 
 		if (pd->rx_buffers[i].mapping)
-			pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->rx_buffers[i].mapping,
-				PKT_BUF_SZ, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+			dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev,
+					 pd->rx_buffers[i].mapping,
+					 PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 
 		pd->rx_ring[i].status = 0;
 		pd->rx_ring[i].length = 0;
@@ -749,8 +751,8 @@ static void smsc9420_rx_handoff(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd, const int index,
 	dev->stats.rx_packets++;
 	dev->stats.rx_bytes += packet_length;
 
-	pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->rx_buffers[index].mapping,
-		PKT_BUF_SZ, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+	dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev, pd->rx_buffers[index].mapping,
+			 PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 	pd->rx_buffers[index].mapping = 0;
 
 	skb = pd->rx_buffers[index].skb;
@@ -782,9 +784,9 @@ static int smsc9420_alloc_rx_buffer(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd, int index)
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	mapping = pci_map_single(pd->pdev, skb_tail_pointer(skb),
-				 PKT_BUF_SZ, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
-	if (pci_dma_mapping_error(pd->pdev, mapping)) {
+	mapping = dma_map_single(&pd->pdev->dev, skb_tail_pointer(skb),
+				 PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+	if (dma_mapping_error(&pd->pdev->dev, mapping)) {
 		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
 		netif_warn(pd, rx_err, pd->dev, "pci_map_single failed!\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -901,8 +903,10 @@ static void smsc9420_complete_tx(struct net_device *dev)
 		BUG_ON(!pd->tx_buffers[index].skb);
 		BUG_ON(!pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping);
 
-		pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping,
-			pd->tx_buffers[index].skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+		dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev,
+				 pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping,
+				 pd->tx_buffers[index].skb->len,
+				 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 		pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping = 0;
 
 		dev_kfree_skb_any(pd->tx_buffers[index].skb);
@@ -932,9 +936,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t smsc9420_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	BUG_ON(pd->tx_buffers[index].skb);
 	BUG_ON(pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping);
 
-	mapping = pci_map_single(pd->pdev, skb->data,
-				 skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
-	if (pci_dma_mapping_error(pd->pdev, mapping)) {
+	mapping = dma_map_single(&pd->pdev->dev, skb->data, skb->len,
+				 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+	if (dma_mapping_error(&pd->pdev->dev, mapping)) {
 		netif_warn(pd, tx_err, pd->dev,
 			   "pci_map_single failed, dropping packet\n");
 		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
@@ -1522,7 +1526,7 @@ smsc9420_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		goto out_free_netdev_2;
 	}
 
-	if (pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+	if (dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
 		netdev_err(dev, "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n");
 		goto out_free_regions_3;
 	}
@@ -1540,10 +1544,9 @@ smsc9420_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 	pd = netdev_priv(dev);
 
 	/* pci descriptors are created in the PCI consistent area */
-	pd->rx_ring = pci_alloc_consistent(pdev,
-		sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * RX_RING_SIZE +
-		sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * TX_RING_SIZE,
-		&pd->rx_dma_addr);
+	pd->rx_ring = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+		sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE),
+		&pd->rx_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!pd->rx_ring)
 		goto out_free_io_4;
@@ -1599,8 +1602,9 @@ smsc9420_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 	return 0;
 
 out_free_dmadesc_5:
-	pci_free_consistent(pdev, sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) *
-		(RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE), pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
+	dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+			  sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE),
+			  pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
 out_free_io_4:
 	iounmap(virt_addr - LAN9420_CPSR_ENDIAN_OFFSET);
 out_free_regions_3:
@@ -1632,8 +1636,9 @@ static void smsc9420_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	BUG_ON(!pd->tx_ring);
 	BUG_ON(!pd->rx_ring);
 
-	pci_free_consistent(pdev, sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) *
-		(RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE), pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
+	dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+			  sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE),
+			  pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
 
 	iounmap(pd->ioaddr - LAN9420_CPSR_ENDIAN_OFFSET);
 	pci_release_regions(pdev);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] smsc9420: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
  2020-09-03 20:10 [PATCH RESEND] smsc9420: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API Christophe JAILLET
@ 2020-09-03 23:54 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2020-09-03 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christophe.jaillet
  Cc: kuba, steve.glendinning, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu,  3 Sep 2020 22:10:55 +0200

> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
> 
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
> hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
> It has been compile tested.
> 
> When memory is allocated in 'smsc9420_probe()', GFP_KERNEL can be used
> because it is a probe function and no lock is acquired.
> 
> While at it, rewrite the size passed to 'dma_alloc_coherent()' the same way
> as the one passed to 'dma_free_coherent()'. This form is less verbose:
>    sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * RX_RING_SIZE +
>    sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * TX_RING_SIZE,
> vs
>    sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE)
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

Applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-03 23:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-03 20:10 [PATCH RESEND] smsc9420: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API Christophe JAILLET
2020-09-03 23:54 ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).