linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] mm, page_alloc: clean up pageset high and batch update
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:31:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200910083116.GA2285@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907163628.26495-2-vbabka@suse.cz>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:36:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> -		setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu), 0);
> +		setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu));

This is not really anything important but I realized we have like 7 functions
messing with pcp lists, and everytime I try to follow them my head spins.

Since setup_pageset is only being called here, could we replace it by the
pageset_init and pageset_update?

(As I said, not important and probably a matter of taste. I just think that
having so many mini functions around is not always cool,
e.g: setup_zone_pageset->zone_pageset_init)

> -/*
> - * pageset_set_high() sets the high water mark for hot per_cpu_pagelist
> - * to the value high for the pageset p.
> - */
> -static void pageset_set_high(struct per_cpu_pageset *p,
> -				unsigned long high)
> -{
> -	unsigned long batch = max(1UL, high / 4);
> -	if ((high / 4) > (PAGE_SHIFT * 8))
> -		batch = PAGE_SHIFT * 8;
> -
> -	pageset_update(&p->pcp, high, batch);
> +	pageset_update(&p->pcp, 0, 1);
>  }

Could we restore the comment we had in pageset_set_high, and maybe
update it to match this new function? I think it would be useful.
>  
>  static void pageset_set_high_and_batch(struct zone *zone,
> -				       struct per_cpu_pageset *pcp)
> +				       struct per_cpu_pageset *p)
>  {
> -	if (percpu_pagelist_fraction)
> -		pageset_set_high(pcp,
> -			(zone_managed_pages(zone) /
> -				percpu_pagelist_fraction));
> -	else
> -		pageset_set_batch(pcp, zone_batchsize(zone));
> +	unsigned long new_high;
> +	unsigned long new_batch;
> +	int fraction = READ_ONCE(percpu_pagelist_fraction);

Why the READ_ONCE? In case there is a parallel update so things to get
messed up?

as I said, I'd appreciate a comment in pageset_set_high_and_batch to be
restored and updated, otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> 

Thanks

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-10  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07 16:36 [RFC 0/5] disable pcplists during page isolation Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-07 16:36 ` [RFC 1/5] mm, page_alloc: clean up pageset high and batch update Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10  8:31   ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2020-09-10  8:34     ` Oscar Salvador
2020-09-10 10:47     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-17 16:05     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-07 16:36 ` [RFC 2/5] mm, page_alloc: calculate pageset high and batch once per zone Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10  9:00   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-09-10 10:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-07 16:36 ` [RFC 3/5] mm, page_alloc(): remove setup_pageset() Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10  9:23   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-09-10  9:57     ` Oscar Salvador
2020-09-18  9:37     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10 11:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-07 16:36 ` [RFC 4/5] mm, page_alloc: cache pageset high and batch in struct zone Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10 11:30   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-09-18 12:02     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-07 16:36 ` [RFC 5/5] mm, page_alloc: disable pcplists during page isolation Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-09 10:48   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-09 11:36     ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-09 11:44       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-09 12:57         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-09 11:55       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10 10:29         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 11:05           ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-10 12:42             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-09 12:53       ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-08 18:29 ` [RFC 0/5] " David Hildenbrand
2020-09-09 10:54   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-09 11:27     ` osalvador
2020-09-09 11:29       ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200910083116.GA2285@linux \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).