* [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: add missing put_device() call in rcar_du_vsp_init()
@ 2020-09-10 13:23 Yu Kuai
2020-09-15 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2020-09-10 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: laurent.pinchart, kieran.bingham+renesas, airlied, daniel
Cc: dri-devel, linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, yukuai3, yi.zhang
if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, rcar_du_vsp_init() doesn't have
a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.
Fixes: 6d62ef3ac30b ("drm: rcar-du: Expose the VSP1 compositor through KMS planes")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
index f1a81c9b184d..172ee3f3b21c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
@@ -352,14 +352,16 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
/* Find the VSP device and initialize it. */
pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
- if (!pdev)
- return -ENXIO;
+ if (!pdev) {
+ ret = -ENXIO;
+ goto put_device;
+ }
vsp->vsp = &pdev->dev;
ret = vsp1_du_init(vsp->vsp);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto put_device;
/*
* The VSP2D (Gen3) has 5 RPFs, but the VSP1D (Gen2) is limited to
@@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
vsp->planes = devm_kcalloc(rcdu->dev, vsp->num_planes,
sizeof(*vsp->planes), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!vsp->planes)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!vsp->planes) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto put_device;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < vsp->num_planes; ++i) {
enum drm_plane_type type = i < num_crtcs
@@ -387,7 +391,7 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_du_vsp_formats),
NULL, type, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto put_device;
drm_plane_helper_add(&plane->plane,
&rcar_du_vsp_plane_helper_funcs);
@@ -403,4 +407,7 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
}
return 0;
+put_device:
+ put_device(&pdev->dev);
+ return ret;
}
--
2.25.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: add missing put_device() call in rcar_du_vsp_init()
2020-09-10 13:23 [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: add missing put_device() call in rcar_du_vsp_init() Yu Kuai
@ 2020-09-15 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2020-09-15 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu Kuai
Cc: kieran.bingham+renesas, airlied, daniel, dri-devel,
linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel, yi.zhang
Hi Yu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:23:54PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, rcar_du_vsp_init() doesn't have
> a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the exception
> handling for this function implementation.
>
> Fixes: 6d62ef3ac30b ("drm: rcar-du: Expose the VSP1 compositor through KMS planes")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
> index f1a81c9b184d..172ee3f3b21c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c
> @@ -352,14 +352,16 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
>
> /* Find the VSP device and initialize it. */
> pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> - if (!pdev)
> - return -ENXIO;
> + if (!pdev) {
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto put_device;
> + }
This change isn't needed, and will actually cause a crash, as pdev is
NULL.
>
> vsp->vsp = &pdev->dev;
>
> ret = vsp1_du_init(vsp->vsp);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto put_device;
>
> /*
> * The VSP2D (Gen3) has 5 RPFs, but the VSP1D (Gen2) is limited to
> @@ -369,8 +371,10 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
>
> vsp->planes = devm_kcalloc(rcdu->dev, vsp->num_planes,
> sizeof(*vsp->planes), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!vsp->planes)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!vsp->planes) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto put_device;
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < vsp->num_planes; ++i) {
> enum drm_plane_type type = i < num_crtcs
> @@ -387,7 +391,7 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
> ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_du_vsp_formats),
> NULL, type, NULL);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto put_device;
>
> drm_plane_helper_add(&plane->plane,
> &rcar_du_vsp_plane_helper_funcs);
> @@ -403,4 +407,7 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_init(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct device_node *np,
> }
>
> return 0;
I would add a blank line here.
> +put_device:
And maybe name the label "error" ?
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> + return ret;
> }
We need more than this, we also need to call put_device() when the
driver is unloaded. The way to handle cleanup in DRM is through
drmm_add_action() nowadays, and I think we could thus simply replace the
change above with a cleanup action that is run both in the error path
and at driver remove.
I'll post a proposal in a reply to this e-mail.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-15 23:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-10 13:23 [PATCH] drm: rcar-du: add missing put_device() call in rcar_du_vsp_init() Yu Kuai
2020-09-15 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).