From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Don't call _irqoff() with hardirqs enabled
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 02:46:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008234609.x3iy65g445hmmt73@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201008162749.860521-1-john@metanate.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:27:49PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> With threadirqs, stmmac_interrupt() is called on a thread with hardirqs
> enabled so we cannot call __napi_schedule_irqoff(). Under lockdep it
> leads to:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 285 at kernel/softirq.c:598 __raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6c/0x1c8
> IRQs not disabled as expected
> Modules linked in: brcmfmac hci_uart btbcm cfg80211 brcmutil
> CPU: 0 PID: 285 Comm: irq/41-eth0 Not tainted 5.4.69-rt39 #1
> Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree)
> [<c0110d3c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c284>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c010c284>] (show_stack) from [<c0855504>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xe0)
> [<c0855504>] (dump_stack) from [<c0120a9c>] (__warn+0xe0/0xfc)
> [<c0120a9c>] (__warn) from [<c0120e80>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x7c/0xa4)
> [<c0120e80>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c01278c8>] (__raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6c/0x1c8)
> [<c01278c8>] (__raise_softirq_irqoff) from [<c056bccc>] (stmmac_interrupt+0x388/0x4e0)
> [<c056bccc>] (stmmac_interrupt) from [<c0178714>] (irq_forced_thread_fn+0x28/0x64)
> [<c0178714>] (irq_forced_thread_fn) from [<c0178924>] (irq_thread+0x124/0x260)
> [<c0178924>] (irq_thread) from [<c0142ee8>] (kthread+0x154/0x164)
> [<c0142ee8>] (kthread) from [<c01010bc>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x38)
> Exception stack(0xeb7b5fb0 to 0xeb7b5ff8)
> 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
> irq event stamp: 48
> hardirqs last enabled at (50): [<c085c200>] prb_unlock+0x7c/0x8c
> hardirqs last disabled at (51): [<c085c0dc>] prb_lock+0x58/0x100
> softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c011e770>] copy_process+0x550/0x1654
> softirqs last disabled at (25): [<c01786ec>] irq_forced_thread_fn+0x0/0x64
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]---
>
> Use __napi_schedule() instead which will save & restore the interrupt
> state.
>
> Fixes: 4ccb45857c2c ("net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue")
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
> ---
Don't get me wrong, this is so cool that the new lockdep warning is really
helping out finding real bugs, but the patch that adds that warning
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=cdabce2e3dff7e4bcef73473987618569d178af3)
isn't in 5.4.69-rt39, is it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 16:27 [PATCH] net: stmmac: Don't call _irqoff() with hardirqs enabled John Keeping
2020-10-08 23:46 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2020-10-09 9:59 ` John Keeping
2020-10-09 10:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-09 14:54 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-09 15:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-09 16:06 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-10 13:08 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-10 15:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-11 9:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-11 16:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-11 13:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-11 15:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201008234609.x3iy65g445hmmt73@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).