From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Don't call _irqoff() with hardirqs enabled
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:22:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201010082248.22cc7656@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <070b2b87-f38c-088d-4aaf-12045dbd92f7@gmail.com>
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:08:15 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.10.2020 18:06, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > On 09.10.2020 17:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:54:06 +0200 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>> I'm thinking about a __napi_schedule version that disables hard irq's
> >>> conditionally, based on variable force_irqthreads, exported by the irq
> >>> subsystem. This would allow to behave correctly with threadirqs set,
> >>> whilst not loosing the _irqoff benefit with threadirqs unset.
> >>> Let me come up with a proposal.
> >>
> >> I think you'd need to make napi_schedule_irqoff() behave like that,
> >> right? Are there any uses of napi_schedule_irqoff() that are disabling
> >> irqs and not just running from an irq handler?
> >>
> > Right, the best approach depends on the answer to the latter question.
> > I didn't check this yet, therefore I described the least intrusive approach.
> >
>
> With some help from coccinelle I identified the following functions that
> call napi_schedule_irqoff() or __napi_schedule_irqoff() and do not run
> from an irq handler (at least not at the first glance).
>
> dpaa2_caam_fqdan_cb
> qede_simd_fp_handler
> mlx4_en_rx_irq
> mlx4_en_tx_irq
Don't know the others but FWIW the mlx4 ones run from an IRQ handler,
AFAICT:
static irqreturn_t mlx4_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_ptr)
static irqreturn_t mlx4_msi_x_interrupt(int irq, void *eq_ptr)
mlx4_eq_int()
mlx4_cq_completion
cq->comp()
> qeth_qdio_poll
> netvsc_channel_cb
> napi_watchdog
This one runs from a hrtimer, which I believe will be a hard irq
context on anything but RT. I could be wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-10 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 16:27 [PATCH] net: stmmac: Don't call _irqoff() with hardirqs enabled John Keeping
2020-10-08 23:46 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-09 9:59 ` John Keeping
2020-10-09 10:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-09 14:54 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-09 15:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-09 16:06 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-10 13:08 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-10 15:22 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-10-11 9:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-11 16:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-11 13:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-10-11 15:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201010082248.22cc7656@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).