From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock: ratelimit unknown ioctl error message
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:39:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026093917.5zgginii65pq6ezd@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d893e3251f804cffa797b6eb814944fd@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 09:13:23AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>From: Stefano Garzarella
>> Sent: 26 October 2020 08:43
>...
>> >Isn't the canonical error for unknown ioctl codes -ENOTTY?
>> >
>>
>> Oh, thanks for pointing that out!
>>
>> I had not paid attention to the error returned, but looking at it I
>> noticed that perhaps the most appropriate would be -ENOIOCTLCMD.
>> In the ioctl syscall we return -ENOTTY, if the callback returns
>> -ENOIOCTLCMD.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>It is 729 v 443 in favour of ENOTTY (based on grep).
Under net/ it is 6 vs 83 in favour of ENOIOCTLCMD.
>
>No idea where ENOIOCTLCMD comes from, but ENOTTY probably
>goes back to the early 1970s.
Me too.
>
>The fact that the ioctl wrapper converts the value is a good
>hint that userspace expects ENOTTY.
Agree on that, but since we are not interfacing directly with userspace,
I think it is better to return the more specific error (ENOIOCTLCMD).
Thanks,
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-23 12:21 [PATCH] vsock: ratelimit unknown ioctl error message Colin King
2020-10-23 14:09 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-10-23 20:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-23 21:30 ` David Laight
2020-10-26 8:43 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-10-26 9:13 ` David Laight
2020-10-26 9:39 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2020-10-26 9:46 ` David Laight
2020-10-26 10:01 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-10-26 17:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-26 18:24 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-10-26 18:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201026093917.5zgginii65pq6ezd@steredhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).