[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 01/11] pinctrl: rockchip: enable gpio pclk for rockchip_gpio_to_irq

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 01/11] pinctrl: rockchip: enable gpio pclk for rockchip_gpio_to_irq

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>

[ Upstream commit 63fbf8013b2f6430754526ef9594f229c7219b1f ]

There need to enable pclk_gpio when do irq_create_mapping, since it will
do access to gpio controller.

Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang<kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201013063731.3618-3-jay.xu@rock-chips.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
index 1bd8840e11a6e..930edfc32f597 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
@@ -2811,7 +2811,9 @@ static int rockchip_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
 	if (!bank->domain)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
+	clk_enable(bank->clk);
 	virq = irq_create_mapping(bank->domain, offset);
+	clk_disable(bank->clk);
 
 	return (virq) ? : -ENXIO;
 }
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 02/11] scsi: ufs: Fix unbalanced scsi_block_reqs_cnt caused by ufshcd_hold()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>

[ Upstream commit da3fecb0040324c08f1587e5bff1f15f36be1872 ]

The scsi_block_reqs_cnt increased in ufshcd_hold() is supposed to be
decreased back in ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way. However, if
specific ufshcd_hold/release sequences are met, it is possible that
scsi_block_reqs_cnt is increased twice but only one ungate work is
queued. To make sure scsi_block_reqs_cnt is handled by ufshcd_hold() and
ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way, increase it only if queue_work()
returns true.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1604384682-15837-2-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org
Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su <hongwus@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index d538b3d4f74a5..0772327f87d93 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1569,12 +1569,12 @@ int ufshcd_hold(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool async)
 		 */
 		/* fallthrough */
 	case CLKS_OFF:
-		ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
 		hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_ON;
 		trace_ufshcd_clk_gating(dev_name(hba->dev),
 					hba->clk_gating.state);
-		queue_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
-			   &hba->clk_gating.ungate_work);
+		if (queue_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
+			       &hba->clk_gating.ungate_work))
+			ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
 		/*
 		 * fall through to check if we should wait for this
 		 * work to be done or not.
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 03/11] selftests: kvm: Fix the segment descriptor layout to match the actual layout

[Sasha Levin]

From: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>

[ Upstream commit df11f7dd5834146defa448acba097e8d7703cc42 ]

Fix the layout of 'struct desc64' to match the layout described in the
SDM Vol 3, Chapter 3 "Protected-Mode Memory Management", section 3.4.5
"Segment Descriptors", Figure 3-8 "Segment Descriptor".  The test added
later in this series relies on this and crashes if this layout is not
correct.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Message-Id: <20201012194716.3950330-2-aaronlewis@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c     | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
index ff234018219cf..aead07c24afcf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ enum x86_register {
 struct desc64 {
 	uint16_t limit0;
 	uint16_t base0;
-	unsigned base1:8, s:1, type:4, dpl:2, p:1;
+	unsigned base1:8, type:4, s:1, dpl:2, p:1;
 	unsigned limit1:4, avl:1, l:1, db:1, g:1, base2:8;
 	uint32_t base3;
 	uint32_t zero1;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
index 6698cb741e10a..7d8f7fc736467 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
@@ -446,11 +446,12 @@ static void kvm_seg_fill_gdt_64bit(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_segment *segp)
 	desc->limit0 = segp->limit & 0xFFFF;
 	desc->base0 = segp->base & 0xFFFF;
 	desc->base1 = segp->base >> 16;
-	desc->s = segp->s;
 	desc->type = segp->type;
+	desc->s = segp->s;
 	desc->dpl = segp->dpl;
 	desc->p = segp->present;
 	desc->limit1 = segp->limit >> 16;
+	desc->avl = segp->avl;
 	desc->l = segp->l;
 	desc->db = segp->db;
 	desc->g = segp->g;
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 04/11] ACPI: button: Add DMI quirk for Medion Akoya E2228T

[Sasha Levin]

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 7daaa06357bf7f1874b62bb1ea9d66a51d4e567e ]

The Medion Akoya E2228T's ACPI _LID implementation is quite broken,
it has the same issues as the one from the Medion Akoya E2215T:

1. For notifications it uses an ActiveLow Edge GpioInt, rather then
   an ActiveBoth one, meaning that the device is only notified when the
   lid is closed, not when it is opened.

2. Matching with this its _LID method simply always returns 0 (closed)

In order for the Linux LID code to work properly with this implementation,
the lid_init_state selection needs to be set to ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN,
add a DMI quirk for this.

While working on this I also found out that the MD60### part of the model
number differs per country/batch while all of the E2215T and E2228T models
have this issue, so also remove the " MD60198" part from the E2215T quirk.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/button.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
index 690bfe67e643d..ee7a7da276ddf 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
@@ -85,7 +85,18 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id lid_blacklst[] = {
 		 */
 		.matches = {
 			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "MEDION"),
-			DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E2215T MD60198"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E2215T"),
+		},
+		.driver_data = (void *)(long)ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN,
+	},
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Medion Akoya E2228T, notification of the LID device only
+		 * happens on close, not on open and _LID always returns closed.
+		 */
+		.matches = {
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "MEDION"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E2228T"),
 		},
 		.driver_data = (void *)(long)ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN,
 	},
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 05/11] arm64: errata: Fix handling of 1418040 with late CPU onlining

[Sasha Levin]

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit f969f03888b9438fdb227b6460d99ede5737326d ]

In a surprising turn of events, it transpires that CPU capabilities
configured as ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE are never set as the
result of late-onlining. Therefore our handling of erratum 1418040 does
not get activated if it is not required by any of the boot CPUs, even
though we allow late-onlining of an affected CPU.

In order to get things working again, replace the cpus_have_const_cap()
invocation with an explicit check for the current CPU using
this_cpu_has_cap().

Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106114952.10032-1-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 10d3048dec7c2..ccae05da98a7f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 /*
  * CPU feature detected at boot time based on feature of one or more CPUs.
  * All possible conflicts for a late CPU are ignored.
+ * NOTE: this means that a late CPU with the feature will *not* cause the
+ * capability to be advertised by cpus_have_*cap()!
  */
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE		\
 	(ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU		|	\
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 10190c4b16dc4..7d7cfa128b71b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -511,14 +511,13 @@ static void erratum_1418040_thread_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
 	bool prev32, next32;
 	u64 val;
 
-	if (!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1418040) &&
-	      cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1418040)))
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1418040))
 		return;
 
 	prev32 = is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(prev));
 	next32 = is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(next));
 
-	if (prev32 == next32)
+	if (prev32 == next32 || !this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1418040))
 		return;
 
 	val = read_sysreg(cntkctl_el1);
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 06/11] arm64: psci: Avoid printing in cpu_psci_cpu_die()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 891deb87585017d526b67b59c15d38755b900fea ]

cpu_psci_cpu_die() is called in the context of the dying CPU, which
will no longer be online or tracked by RCU. It is therefore not generally
safe to call printk() if the PSCI "cpu off" request fails, so remove the
pr_crit() invocation.

Cc: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106103602.9849-2-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
index 43ae4e0c968f6..62d2bda7adb80 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static void cpu_psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	int ret;
 	/*
 	 * There are no known implementations of PSCI actually using the
 	 * power state field, pass a sensible default for now.
@@ -74,9 +73,7 @@ static void cpu_psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
 	u32 state = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN <<
 		    PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_SHIFT;
 
-	ret = psci_ops.cpu_off(state);
-
-	pr_crit("unable to power off CPU%u (%d)\n", cpu, ret);
+	psci_ops.cpu_off(state);
 }
 
 static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 07/11] arm64: smp: Tell RCU about CPUs that fail to come online

[Sasha Levin]

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 04e613ded8c26489b3e0f9101b44462f780d1a35 ]

Commit ce3d31ad3cac ("arm64/smp: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") ensured
that RCU is informed early about incoming CPUs that might end up calling
into printk() before they are online. However, if such a CPU fails the
early CPU feature compatibility checks in check_local_cpu_capabilities(),
then it will be powered off or parked without informing RCU, leading to
an endless stream of stalls:

  | rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
  | rcu:	2-O...: (0 ticks this GP) idle=002/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=0/0 fqs=2593
  | (detected by 0, t=5252 jiffies, g=9317, q=136)
  | Task dump for CPU 2:
  | task:swapper/2       state:R  running task     stack:    0 pid:    0 ppid:     1 flags:0x00000028
  | Call trace:
  | ret_from_fork+0x0/0x30

Ensure that the dying CPU invokes rcu_report_dead() prior to being powered
off or parked.

Cc: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105222242.GA8842@willie-the-truck
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106103602.9849-3-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
 kernel/rcu/tree.c       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 426409e0d0713..987220ac4cfef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ void cpu_die_early(void)
 
 	/* Mark this CPU absent */
 	set_cpu_present(cpu, 0);
+	rcu_report_dead(cpu);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 	update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_KILL_ME);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 62e59596a30a0..1b1d2b09efa9b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3157,7 +3157,6 @@ void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
 	smp_mb(); /* Ensure RCU read-side usage follows above initialization. */
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 /*
  * The outgoing function has no further need of RCU, so remove it from
  * the rcu_node tree's ->qsmaskinitnext bit masks.
@@ -3197,6 +3196,7 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 /*
  * The outgoing CPU has just passed through the dying-idle state, and we
  * are being invoked from the CPU that was IPIed to continue the offline
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 08/11] lockdep: Avoid to modify chain keys in validate_chain()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit d61fc96a37603384cd531622c1e89de1096b5123 ]

Chris Wilson reported a problem spotted by check_chain_key(): a chain
key got changed in validate_chain() because we modify the ->read in
validate_chain() to skip checks for dependency adding, and ->read is
taken into calculation for chain key since commit f611e8cf98ec
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
chainkey").

Fix this by avoiding to modify ->read in validate_chain() based on two
facts: a) since we now support recursive read lock detection, there is
no need to skip checks for dependency adding for recursive readers, b)
since we have a), there is only one case left (nest_lock) where we want
to skip checks in validate_chain(), we simply remove the modification
for ->read and rely on the return value of check_deadlock() to skip the
dependency adding.

Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index bca0f7f71cde4..7f29d9ae6fcfa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2382,7 +2382,9 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
  * (Note that this has to be done separately, because the graph cannot
  * detect such classes of deadlocks.)
  *
- * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
+ * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 if another lock with the same
+ * lock class is held but nest_lock is also held, i.e. we rely on the
+ * nest_lock to avoid the deadlock.
  */
 static int
 check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
@@ -2405,7 +2407,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 		 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
 		 */
 		if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read)
-			return 2;
+			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * We're holding the nest_lock, which serializes this lock's
@@ -2961,16 +2963,13 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
 
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;
-		/*
-		 * Mark recursive read, as we jump over it when
-		 * building dependencies (just like we jump over
-		 * trylock entries):
-		 */
-		if (ret == 2)
-			hlock->read = 2;
 		/*
 		 * Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
-		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
+		 * of the chain, and if the new lock introduces no more
+		 * lock dependency (because we already hold a lock with the
+		 * same lock class) nor deadlock (because the nest_lock
+		 * serializes nesting locks), see the comments for
+		 * check_deadlock().
 		 */
 		if (!chain_head && ret != 2) {
 			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 09/11] vfs: remove lockdep bogosity in __sb_start_write

[Sasha Levin]

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

[ Upstream commit 22843291efc986ce7722610073fcf85a39b4cb13 ]

__sb_start_write has some weird looking lockdep code that claims to
exist to handle nested freeze locking requests from xfs.  The code as
written seems broken -- if we think we hold a read lock on any of the
higher freeze levels (e.g. we hold SB_FREEZE_WRITE and are trying to
lock SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT), it converts a blocking lock attempt into a
trylock.

However, it's not correct to downgrade a blocking lock attempt to a
trylock unless the downgrading code or the callers are prepared to deal
with that situation.  Neither __sb_start_write nor its callers handle
this at all.  For example:

sb_start_pagefault ignores the return value completely, with the result
that if xfs_filemap_fault loses a race with a different thread trying to
fsfreeze, it will proceed without pagefault freeze protection (thereby
breaking locking rules) and then unlocks the pagefault freeze lock that
it doesn't own on its way out (thereby corrupting the lock state), which
leads to a system hang shortly afterwards.

Normally, this won't happen because our ownership of a read lock on a
higher freeze protection level blocks fsfreeze from grabbing a write
lock on that higher level.  *However*, if lockdep is offline,
lock_is_held_type unconditionally returns 1, which means that
percpu_rwsem_is_held returns 1, which means that __sb_start_write
unconditionally converts blocking freeze lock attempts into trylocks,
even when we *don't* hold anything that would block a fsfreeze.

Apparently this all held together until 5.10-rc1, when bugs in lockdep
caused lockdep to shut itself off early in an fstests run, and once
fstests gets to the "race writes with freezer" tests, kaboom.  This
might explain the long trail of vanishingly infrequent livelocks in
fstests after lockdep goes offline that I've never been able to
diagnose.

We could fix it by spinning on the trylock if wait==true, but AFAICT the
locking works fine if lockdep is not built at all (and I didn't see any
complaints running fstests overnight), so remove this snippet entirely.

NOTE: Commit f4b554af9931 in 2015 created the current weird logic (which
used to exist in a different form in commit 5accdf82ba25c from 2012) in
__sb_start_write.  XFS solved this whole problem in the late 2.6 era by
creating a variant of transactions (XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT) that don't
grab intwrite freeze protection, thus making lockdep's solution
unnecessary.  The commit claims that Dave Chinner explained that the
trylock hack + comment could be removed, but nobody ever did.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/super.c | 33 ++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index a288cd60d2aed..877532baf513d 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1647,36 +1647,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_end_write);
  */
 int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait)
 {
-	bool force_trylock = false;
-	int ret = 1;
+	if (!wait)
+		return percpu_down_read_trylock(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-	/*
-	 * We want lockdep to tell us about possible deadlocks with freezing
-	 * but it's it bit tricky to properly instrument it. Getting a freeze
-	 * protection works as getting a read lock but there are subtle
-	 * problems. XFS for example gets freeze protection on internal level
-	 * twice in some cases, which is OK only because we already hold a
-	 * freeze protection also on higher level. Due to these cases we have
-	 * to use wait == F (trylock mode) which must not fail.
-	 */
-	if (wait) {
-		int i;
-
-		for (i = 0; i < level - 1; i++)
-			if (percpu_rwsem_is_held(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + i)) {
-				force_trylock = true;
-				break;
-			}
-	}
-#endif
-	if (wait && !force_trylock)
-		percpu_down_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
-	else
-		ret = percpu_down_read_trylock(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
-
-	WARN_ON(force_trylock && !ret);
-	return ret;
+	percpu_down_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
+	return 1;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write);
 
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 10/11] gfs2: fix possible reference leak in gfs2_check_blk_type

[Sasha Levin]

From: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit bc923818b190c8b63c91a47702969c8053574f5b ]

In the fail path of gfs2_check_blk_type, forgetting to call
gfs2_glock_dq_uninit will result in rgd_gh reference leak.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/gfs2/rgrp.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 2466bb44a23c5..2dfcea5a71153 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -2571,13 +2571,13 @@ int gfs2_check_blk_type(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, u64 no_addr, unsigned int type)
 
 	rbm.rgd = rgd;
 	error = gfs2_rbm_from_block(&rbm, no_addr);
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(error))
-		goto fail;
-
-	if (gfs2_testbit(&rbm, false) != type)
-		error = -ESTALE;
+	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(error)) {
+		if (gfs2_testbit(&rbm, false) != type)
+			error = -ESTALE;
+	}
 
 	gfs2_glock_dq_uninit(&rgd_gh);
+
 fail:
 	return error;
 }
-- 
2.27.0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 11/11] hwmon: (pwm-fan) Fix RPM calculation

[Sasha Levin]

From: Paul Barker <pbarker@konsulko.com>

[ Upstream commit fd8feec665fef840277515a5c2b9b7c3e3970fad ]

To convert the number of pulses counted into an RPM estimation, we need
to divide by the width of our measurement interval instead of
multiplying by it. If the width of the measurement interval is zero we
don't update the RPM value to avoid dividing by zero.

We also don't need to do 64-bit division, with 32-bits we can handle a
fan running at over 4 million RPM.

Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <pbarker@konsulko.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201111164643.7087-1-pbarker@konsulko.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
index 42ffd2e5182d5..c88ce77fe6763 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
@@ -54,16 +54,18 @@ static irqreturn_t pulse_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 static void sample_timer(struct timer_list *t)
 {
 	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = from_timer(ctx, t, rpm_timer);
+	unsigned int delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), ctx->sample_start);
 	int pulses;
-	u64 tmp;
 
-	pulses = atomic_read(&ctx->pulses);
-	atomic_sub(pulses, &ctx->pulses);
-	tmp = (u64)pulses * ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), ctx->sample_start) * 60;
-	do_div(tmp, ctx->pulses_per_revolution * 1000);
-	ctx->rpm = tmp;
+	if (delta) {
+		pulses = atomic_read(&ctx->pulses);
+		atomic_sub(pulses, &ctx->pulses);
+		ctx->rpm = (unsigned int)(pulses * 1000 * 60) /
+			(ctx->pulses_per_revolution * delta);
+
+		ctx->sample_start = ktime_get();
+	}
 
-	ctx->sample_start = ktime_get();
 	mod_timer(&ctx->rpm_timer, jiffies + HZ);
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0