linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure
@ 2020-12-11  7:23 David Gow
  2020-12-11 20:16 ` kernel test robot
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2020-12-11  7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brendan Higgins, Shuah Khan, Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan, Daniel Latypov, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev,
	linux-kernel, David Gow

When a number of tests fail, it can be useful to get higher-level
statistics of how many tests are failing (or how many parameters are
failing in parameterised tests), and in what cases or suites. This is
already done by some non-KUnit tests, so add support for automatically
generating these for KUnit tests.

This change adds a 'kunit_stats_enabled' switch which has three values:
- 0: No stats are printed (current behaviour)
- 1: Stats are printed only for tests/suites with more than one
     subtests, and at least one failure (new default)
- 2: Always print test statistics

For parameterised tests, the summary line looks as follows:
"    # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: 0 / 16 test parameters failed"
For test suites, it looks like this:
"# ext4_inode_test: (0 / 1) tests failed (0 / 16 test parameters)"

kunit_tool is also updated to correctly ignore diagnostic lines, so that
these statistics do not prevent the result from parsing.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

This is largely a follow-up to the discussion here:
 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CABVgOSmy4n_LGwDS7yWfoLftcQzxv6S+iXx9Y=OPcgG2gu0z1w@mail.gmail.com/T/#t

Does this seem like a sensible addition?

Cheers,
-- David

 lib/kunit/test.c                    | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index ec9494e914ef..711e269366a7 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include <kunit/test.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/kref.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 
@@ -16,6 +17,40 @@
 #include "string-stream.h"
 #include "try-catch-impl.h"
 
+/*
+ * KUnit statistic mode:
+ * 0 - disabled
+ * 1 - only when there is at least one failure, and more than one subtest
+ * 2 - enabled
+ */
+static int kunit_stats_enabled = 1;
+core_param(kunit_stats_enabled, kunit_stats_enabled, int, 0644);
+
+static bool kunit_should_print_stats(int num_failures, int num_subtests)
+{
+	if (kunit_stats_enabled == 0)
+		return false;
+
+	if (kunit_stats_enabled == 2)
+		return true;
+
+	return (num_failures > 0 && num_subtests > 1);
+}
+
+static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
+				   size_t num_failures, size_t num_subtests)
+{
+	if (!kunit_should_print_stats(num_failures, num_subtests))
+		return;
+
+	kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
+		  KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
+		  "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
+		  test->name,
+		  num_failures,
+		  num_subtests);
+}
+
 /*
  * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
  * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
@@ -346,15 +381,37 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
 	test_case->success = test->success;
 }
 
+static void kunit_print_suite_stats(struct kunit_suite *suite,
+				    size_t num_failures,
+				    size_t total_param_failures,
+				    size_t total_params)
+{
+	size_t num_cases = kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite);
+
+	if (!kunit_should_print_stats(num_failures, num_cases))
+		return;
+
+	kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
+		  "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
+		  suite->name,
+		  num_failures,
+		  num_cases,
+		  total_param_failures,
+		  total_params);
+}
+
 int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE];
 	struct kunit_case *test_case;
+	size_t num_suite_failures = 0;
+	size_t total_param_failures = 0, total_params = 0;
 
 	kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
 
 	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
 		struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
+		size_t num_params = 0, num_failures = 0;
 		bool test_success = true;
 
 		if (test_case->generate_params) {
@@ -385,13 +442,27 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 				test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
 				test.param_index++;
 			}
+
+			if (!test.success)
+				num_failures++;
+			num_params++;
+
 		} while (test.param_value);
 
+		kunit_print_test_stats(&test, num_failures, num_params);
+
 		kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success,
 				      kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
 				      test_case->name);
+
+		if (!test_success)
+			num_suite_failures++;
+		total_params += num_params;
+		total_param_failures += num_failures;
 	}
 
+	kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, num_suite_failures,
+				total_param_failures, total_params);
 	kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index 6614ec4d0898..88ee2b2668ad 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def print_log(log):
 	for m in log:
 		print_with_timestamp(m)
 
-TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*#).*$')
+TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*# Subtest:).*$')
 
 def consume_non_diagnositic(lines: List[str]) -> None:
 	while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines[0]):

base-commit: 5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a
-- 
2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure
  2020-12-11  7:23 [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure David Gow
@ 2020-12-11 20:16 ` kernel test robot
  2020-12-11 20:22 ` kernel test robot
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-12-11 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gow, Brendan Higgins, Shuah Khan, Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: kbuild-all, Arpitha Raghunandan, Daniel Latypov, linux-kselftest,
	kunit-dev, linux-kernel, David Gow

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8456 bytes --]

Hi David,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on 5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Gow/kunit-Print-test-statistics-on-failure/20201211-153009
base:    5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a
config: arc-randconfig-r006-20201210 (attached as .config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/2bdf1b55a1b3673a1a02f71457fc52b497fc7223
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review David-Gow/kunit-Print-test-statistics-on-failure/20201211-153009
        git checkout 2bdf1b55a1b3673a1a02f71457fc52b497fc7223
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_print_test_stats':
>> include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:46:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
      46 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:48:14: note: format string is defined here
      48 |     "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
         |            ~~^
         |              |
         |              long unsigned int
         |            %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:46:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
      46 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:48:20: note: format string is defined here
      48 |     "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
         |                  ~~^
         |                    |
         |                    long unsigned int
         |                  %u
   lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_log_append':
   lib/kunit/test.c:72:2: warning: function 'kunit_log_append' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
      72 |  vsnprintf(line, sizeof(line), fmt, args);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_print_suite_stats':
>> include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:15: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
         |             ~~^
         |               |
         |               long unsigned int
         |             %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:21: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
         |                   ~~^
         |                     |
         |                     long unsigned int
         |                   %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:40: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
         |                                      ~~^
         |                                        |
         |                                        long unsigned int
         |                                      %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:46: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
         |                                            ~~^
         |                                              |
         |                                              long unsigned int
         |                                            %u

vim +5 include/linux/kern_levels.h

314ba3520e513a Joe Perches 2012-07-30  4  
04d2c8c83d0e3a Joe Perches 2012-07-30 @5  #define KERN_SOH	"\001"		/* ASCII Start Of Header */
04d2c8c83d0e3a Joe Perches 2012-07-30  6  #define KERN_SOH_ASCII	'\001'
04d2c8c83d0e3a Joe Perches 2012-07-30  7  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 32103 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure
  2020-12-11  7:23 [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure David Gow
  2020-12-11 20:16 ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-12-11 20:22 ` kernel test robot
  2020-12-11 23:41 ` Daniel Latypov
  2021-02-05 23:27 ` Brendan Higgins
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-12-11 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gow, Brendan Higgins, Shuah Khan, Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: kbuild-all, Arpitha Raghunandan, Daniel Latypov, linux-kselftest,
	kunit-dev, linux-kernel, David Gow

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7372 bytes --]

Hi David,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on 5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Gow/kunit-Print-test-statistics-on-failure/20201211-153009
base:    5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a
config: c6x-randconfig-r004-20201210 (attached as .config)
compiler: c6x-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/2bdf1b55a1b3673a1a02f71457fc52b497fc7223
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review David-Gow/kunit-Print-test-statistics-on-failure/20201211-153009
        git checkout 2bdf1b55a1b3673a1a02f71457fc52b497fc7223
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=c6x 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> lib/kunit/test.c:27:53: error: expected ')' before 'int'
      27 | core_param(kunit_stats_enabled, kunit_stats_enabled, int, 0644);
         |                                                     ^~~~
         |                                                     )
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_print_test_stats':
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:46:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
      46 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:48:14: note: format string is defined here
      48 |     "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
         |            ~~^
         |              |
         |              long unsigned int
         |            %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:46:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
      46 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:48:20: note: format string is defined here
      48 |     "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
         |                  ~~^
         |                    |
         |                    long unsigned int
         |                  %u
   lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_log_append':
   lib/kunit/test.c:72:2: warning: function 'kunit_log_append' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
      72 |  vsnprintf(line, sizeof(line), fmt, args);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_print_suite_stats':
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:15: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
         |             ~~^
         |               |
         |               long unsigned int
         |             %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:21: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
         |                   ~~^
         |                     |
         |                     long unsigned int
         |                   %u
   In file included from lib/kunit/test.c:9:
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
       5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001"  /* ASCII Start Of Header */
         |                  ^~~~~~
   include/kunit/test.h:621:10: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
     621 |   printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
         |          ^~~
   include/linux/kern_levels.h:14:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
      14 | #define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
         |                   ^~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:394:12: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_INFO'
     394 |  kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
         |            ^~~~~~~~~
   lib/kunit/test.c:395:40: note: format string is defined here
     395 |     "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",

vim +27 lib/kunit/test.c

    19	
    20	/*
    21	 * KUnit statistic mode:
    22	 * 0 - disabled
    23	 * 1 - only when there is at least one failure, and more than one subtest
    24	 * 2 - enabled
    25	 */
    26	static int kunit_stats_enabled = 1;
  > 27	core_param(kunit_stats_enabled, kunit_stats_enabled, int, 0644);
    28	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26912 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure
  2020-12-11  7:23 [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure David Gow
  2020-12-11 20:16 ` kernel test robot
  2020-12-11 20:22 ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-12-11 23:41 ` Daniel Latypov
  2021-02-05 23:27 ` Brendan Higgins
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Latypov @ 2020-12-11 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gow
  Cc: Brendan Higgins, Shuah Khan, Andy Shevchenko,
	Arpitha Raghunandan, open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK,
	KUnit Development, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:23 PM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> When a number of tests fail, it can be useful to get higher-level
> statistics of how many tests are failing (or how many parameters are
> failing in parameterised tests), and in what cases or suites. This is
> already done by some non-KUnit tests, so add support for automatically
> generating these for KUnit tests.
>
> This change adds a 'kunit_stats_enabled' switch which has three values:
> - 0: No stats are printed (current behaviour)
> - 1: Stats are printed only for tests/suites with more than one
>      subtests, and at least one failure (new default)
> - 2: Always print test statistics

I personally prefer having less options here, if possible.

a) I wonder if 0 can be dropped in favor of just using the default (1).
I don't know that showing test counts on failures (ideally a rare
occurrence) in the diagnostics would be enough of an annoyance that
people would want to turn it off.

b) And/or perhaps strike a compromise between 1/2.
We print the test stats whenever there are >1 subtests, regardless of
# of failures.

If we take both suggestions, then we just have one way, which is
appealing to me personally, but I don't know that people would like
that.

>
> For parameterised tests, the summary line looks as follows:
> "    # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: 0 / 16 test parameters failed"
> For test suites, it looks like this:
> "# ext4_inode_test: (0 / 1) tests failed (0 / 16 test parameters)"
>
> kunit_tool is also updated to correctly ignore diagnostic lines, so that
> these statistics do not prevent the result from parsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> ---
>
> This is largely a follow-up to the discussion here:
>  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CABVgOSmy4n_LGwDS7yWfoLftcQzxv6S+iXx9Y=OPcgG2gu0z1w@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>
> Does this seem like a sensible addition?
>
> Cheers,
> -- David
>
>  lib/kunit/test.c                    | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index ec9494e914ef..711e269366a7 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <kunit/test.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/kref.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>
> @@ -16,6 +17,40 @@
>  #include "string-stream.h"
>  #include "try-catch-impl.h"
>
> +/*
> + * KUnit statistic mode:
> + * 0 - disabled
> + * 1 - only when there is at least one failure, and more than one subtest
> + * 2 - enabled
> + */
> +static int kunit_stats_enabled = 1;
> +core_param(kunit_stats_enabled, kunit_stats_enabled, int, 0644);
> +
> +static bool kunit_should_print_stats(int num_failures, int num_subtests)
> +{
> +       if (kunit_stats_enabled == 0)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (kunit_stats_enabled == 2)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       return (num_failures > 0 && num_subtests > 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
> +                                  size_t num_failures, size_t num_subtests)
> +{
> +       if (!kunit_should_print_stats(num_failures, num_subtests))
> +               return;
> +
> +       kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
> +                 KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> +                 "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
> +                 test->name,
> +                 num_failures,
> +                 num_subtests);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
>   * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
> @@ -346,15 +381,37 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
>         test_case->success = test->success;
>  }
>
> +static void kunit_print_suite_stats(struct kunit_suite *suite,
> +                                   size_t num_failures,
> +                                   size_t total_param_failures,
> +                                   size_t total_params)
> +{
> +       size_t num_cases = kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite);
> +
> +       if (!kunit_should_print_stats(num_failures, num_cases))
> +               return;
> +
> +       kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
> +                 "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
> +                 suite->name,
> +                 num_failures,
> +                 num_cases,
> +                 total_param_failures,
> +                 total_params);
> +}
> +
>  int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE];
>         struct kunit_case *test_case;
> +       size_t num_suite_failures = 0;
> +       size_t total_param_failures = 0, total_params = 0;
>
>         kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
>
>         kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
>                 struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
> +               size_t num_params = 0, num_failures = 0;
>                 bool test_success = true;
>
>                 if (test_case->generate_params) {
> @@ -385,13 +442,27 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>                                 test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
>                                 test.param_index++;
>                         }
> +
> +                       if (!test.success)
> +                               num_failures++;

Completely tangential: I'm glad we're counting failures now.
As noted in previous discussions, we'd want to eventually do this anyways.
It would be good if this func (and eventually `insmod`) could return a
non-zero retcode on test failure so users don't have to necessarily
parse KTAP output.

> +                       num_params++;
> +
>                 } while (test.param_value);
>
> +               kunit_print_test_stats(&test, num_failures, num_params);
> +
>                 kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success,
>                                       kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
>                                       test_case->name);
> +
> +               if (!test_success)
> +                       num_suite_failures++;
> +               total_params += num_params;
> +               total_param_failures += num_failures;
>         }
>
> +       kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, num_suite_failures,
> +                               total_param_failures, total_params);
>         kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
>
>         return 0;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> index 6614ec4d0898..88ee2b2668ad 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def print_log(log):
>         for m in log:
>                 print_with_timestamp(m)
>
> -TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*#).*$')
> +TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*# Subtest:).*$')
>
>  def consume_non_diagnositic(lines: List[str]) -> None:
>         while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines[0]):
>
> base-commit: 5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a
> --
> 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure
  2020-12-11  7:23 [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure David Gow
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-12-11 23:41 ` Daniel Latypov
@ 2021-02-05 23:27 ` Brendan Higgins
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2021-02-05 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gow
  Cc: Shuah Khan, Andy Shevchenko, Arpitha Raghunandan, Daniel Latypov,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, KUnit Development,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:23 PM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> When a number of tests fail, it can be useful to get higher-level
> statistics of how many tests are failing (or how many parameters are
> failing in parameterised tests), and in what cases or suites. This is
> already done by some non-KUnit tests, so add support for automatically
> generating these for KUnit tests.
>
> This change adds a 'kunit_stats_enabled' switch which has three values:
> - 0: No stats are printed (current behaviour)
> - 1: Stats are printed only for tests/suites with more than one
>      subtests, and at least one failure (new default)
> - 2: Always print test statistics
>
> For parameterised tests, the summary line looks as follows:
> "    # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: 0 / 16 test parameters failed"
> For test suites, it looks like this:
> "# ext4_inode_test: (0 / 1) tests failed (0 / 16 test parameters)"
>
> kunit_tool is also updated to correctly ignore diagnostic lines, so that
> these statistics do not prevent the result from parsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Sorry, forgot about this. A couple of comments below:

> ---
>
> This is largely a follow-up to the discussion here:
>  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CABVgOSmy4n_LGwDS7yWfoLftcQzxv6S+iXx9Y=OPcgG2gu0z1w@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>
> Does this seem like a sensible addition?

I am fine with it as long as other people want it.

> Cheers,
> -- David
>
>  lib/kunit/test.c                    | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index ec9494e914ef..711e269366a7 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <kunit/test.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/kref.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>
> @@ -16,6 +17,40 @@
>  #include "string-stream.h"
>  #include "try-catch-impl.h"
>
> +/*
> + * KUnit statistic mode:
> + * 0 - disabled
> + * 1 - only when there is at least one failure, and more than one subtest
> + * 2 - enabled
> + */
> +static int kunit_stats_enabled = 1;
> +core_param(kunit_stats_enabled, kunit_stats_enabled, int, 0644);

I think this should be a module param.

Also, remember to document the param with: MODULE_PARM_DESC()

> +static bool kunit_should_print_stats(int num_failures, int num_subtests)
> +{
> +       if (kunit_stats_enabled == 0)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (kunit_stats_enabled == 2)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       return (num_failures > 0 && num_subtests > 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test,
> +                                  size_t num_failures, size_t num_subtests)
> +{
> +       if (!kunit_should_print_stats(num_failures, num_subtests))
> +               return;
> +
> +       kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test,
> +                 KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> +                 "# %s: %lu / %lu test parameters failed",
> +                 test->name,
> +                 num_failures,
> +                 num_subtests);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Append formatted message to log, size of which is limited to
>   * KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (including null terminating byte).
> @@ -346,15 +381,37 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite,
>         test_case->success = test->success;
>  }
>
> +static void kunit_print_suite_stats(struct kunit_suite *suite,
> +                                   size_t num_failures,
> +                                   size_t total_param_failures,
> +                                   size_t total_params)
> +{
> +       size_t num_cases = kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite);
> +
> +       if (!kunit_should_print_stats(num_failures, num_cases))
> +               return;
> +
> +       kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite,
> +                 "# %s: (%lu / %lu) tests failed (%lu / %lu test parameters)",
> +                 suite->name,
> +                 num_failures,
> +                 num_cases,
> +                 total_param_failures,
> +                 total_params);
> +}
> +
>  int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE];
>         struct kunit_case *test_case;
> +       size_t num_suite_failures = 0;
> +       size_t total_param_failures = 0, total_params = 0;
>
>         kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
>
>         kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
>                 struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
> +               size_t num_params = 0, num_failures = 0;
>                 bool test_success = true;
>
>                 if (test_case->generate_params) {
> @@ -385,13 +442,27 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>                                 test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
>                                 test.param_index++;
>                         }
> +
> +                       if (!test.success)
> +                               num_failures++;
> +                       num_params++;
> +
>                 } while (test.param_value);
>
> +               kunit_print_test_stats(&test, num_failures, num_params);
> +
>                 kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success,
>                                       kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case),
>                                       test_case->name);
> +
> +               if (!test_success)
> +                       num_suite_failures++;
> +               total_params += num_params;
> +               total_param_failures += num_failures;
>         }
>
> +       kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, num_suite_failures,
> +                               total_param_failures, total_params);
>         kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
>
>         return 0;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> index 6614ec4d0898..88ee2b2668ad 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def print_log(log):
>         for m in log:
>                 print_with_timestamp(m)
>
> -TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*#).*$')
> +TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*# Subtest:).*$')
>
>  def consume_non_diagnositic(lines: List[str]) -> None:
>         while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines[0]):
>
> base-commit: 5f6b99d0287de2c2d0b5e7abcb0092d553ad804a
> --
> 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-06  3:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-11  7:23 [PATCH] kunit: Print test statistics on failure David Gow
2020-12-11 20:16 ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 20:22 ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 23:41 ` Daniel Latypov
2021-02-05 23:27 ` Brendan Higgins

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).