[PATCH] blktrace: fix 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context' in case of PREEMPT_RT

* [PATCH] blktrace: fix 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context' in case of PREEMPT_RT
@ 2020-12-14  2:22 Ming Lei
  2020-12-14 15:24 ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-12-14  2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe
  Cc: linux-block, Ming Lei, Christoph Hellwig, Steven Rostedt,
	Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel

trace_note_tsk() is called by __blk_add_trace(), which is covered by RCU read lock.
So in case of PREEMPT_RT, warning of 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context'
will be triggered because spin lock is converted to rtmutex.

Fix the issue by converting running_trace_lock into raw_spin_lock().

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 2c5b3c5317c2..53dc876d669d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static struct trace_array *blk_tr;
 static bool blk_tracer_enabled __read_mostly;
 
 static LIST_HEAD(running_trace_list);
-static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(running_trace_lock);
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(running_trace_lock);
 
 /* Select an alternative, minimalistic output than the original one */
 #define TRACE_BLK_OPT_CLASSIC	0x1
@@ -121,12 +121,12 @@ static void trace_note_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	struct blk_trace *bt;
 
 	tsk->btrace_seq = blktrace_seq;
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&running_trace_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&running_trace_lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry(bt, &running_trace_list, running_list) {
 		trace_note(bt, tsk->pid, BLK_TN_PROCESS, tsk->comm,
 			   sizeof(tsk->comm), 0);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&running_trace_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&running_trace_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void trace_note_time(struct blk_trace *bt)
@@ -669,9 +669,9 @@ static int __blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start)
 			blktrace_seq++;
 			smp_mb();
 			bt->trace_state = Blktrace_running;
-			spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+			raw_spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
 			list_add(&bt->running_list, &running_trace_list);
-			spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
 
 			trace_note_time(bt);
 			ret = 0;
@@ -679,9 +679,9 @@ static int __blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start)
 	} else {
 		if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
 			bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped;
-			spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+			raw_spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
 			list_del_init(&bt->running_list);
-			spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
 			relay_flush(bt->rchan);
 			ret = 0;
 		}
-- 
2.28.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread