linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:31:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108103109.GA23265@duo.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/c2aqSvYCaB9sR6@mit.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 775 bytes --]

Hi!

> > > The gcc bugzilla mentions backports into gcc-linaro, but I do not see
> > > them in my git history.
> > 
> > So, do we raise the minimum gcc version for the kernel as a whole to 5.1
> > or just for aarch64?
> 
> Russell, Arnd, thanks so much for tracking down the root cause of the
> bug!
> 
> I will note that RHEL 7 uses gcc 4.8.  I personally don't have an
> objections to requiring developers using RHEL 7 to have to install a
> more modern gcc (since I use Debian Testing and gcc 10.2.1, myself,
> and gcc 5.1 is so five years ago :-), but I could imagine that being
> considered inconvenient for some.

I'm on gcc 4.9.2 on a machine that is hard to upgrade :-(.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-08 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05 15:47 Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-05 18:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-05 19:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 11:53 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-06 12:13   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 13:52   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 17:20     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-06 17:46       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 21:04       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-06 22:00         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-06 22:32       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 11:18         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 12:45           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 13:16             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 13:37               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 16:27                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-01-07 17:00                   ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-07 21:48                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 22:14                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 22:41                       ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-08  8:21                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-07 22:27                     ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-07 23:53                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-08  8:05                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08  9:13                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-08 10:31                   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2021-01-07 21:20                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08  9:21                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-08  9:26                     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-08 20:02                       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-08 20:22                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 21:20                           ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-08 20:29                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-12 13:20                         ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-12 13:31                           ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-12 13:46                             ` David Laight
2021-01-12 17:28                           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 13:13                             ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210108103109.GA23265@duo.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).