From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:20:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmcKjwJkiu+VDWrjQO9RYjv-WEqepQJnLZrY2wtBmEwmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2w2u8pcQJue3OveDckJNkGmwzVdfOM-VEXShQEw8EOzw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:34 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:02 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:27 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:21:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:20:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:37 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> >
> > I appreciate Arnd pointing out "--std=gnu11", though. What are the
> > actual relevant language improvements?
It's hard to say, since a lot of new language features were already
GNU C extensions.
The only semantic difference I'm aware of is the semantics of `extern
inline` changed 100% from c89 to c99 (so jumping from gnu89 to gnu11
would change that). We already #define inline to
__attribute__((__gnu_inline)) (there's also a -fgnu-inline flag), but
I worry for places that don't include that header or drop
KBUILD_CFLAGS (like every vdso), though `extern inline` is awful (and
I should be put in jail for introducing it to the kernel; now we have
__attribute__((no_stack_protector)) in both toolchains, and should be
using that instead, but we don't have it yet for all supported
compiler versions).
A quick grep through clang's sources shows mostly parser changes for
_Noreturn, _Alignof and friends etc.. New to me are unicode literal
strings (u or U suffix or prefix?) and something about loops expected
to make forward progress???
Another thing I've been worried about is Makefiles that reset
KBUILD_CFLAGS, since that's a constant source of pain/breakage for
cross compiling from Clang. That tends to drop -std=gnu89. For
instance:
$ make LLVM=1 -j71 defconfig
$ make LLVM=1 -j71 V=1 &>log.txt
$ grep -v std=gnu89 log.txt | grep clang | rev | cut -d ' ' -f 1 | rev
| grep -v \\.S
arch/x86/realmode/rm/wakemain.c
arch/x86/realmode/rm/video-mode.c
arch/x86/realmode/rm/regs.c
arch/x86/realmode/rm/video-vga.c
arch/x86/realmode/rm/video-vesa.c
arch/x86/realmode/rm/video-bios.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/gop.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/secureboot.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/tpm.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/file.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/mem.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/randomalloc.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/pci.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/skip_spaces.c
lib/cmdline.c
lib/ctype.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/alignedmem.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/vsprintf.c
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
arch/x86/boot/a20.c
arch/x86/boot/cmdline.c
arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
arch/x86/boot/cpucheck.c
arch/x86/boot/early_serial_console.c
arch/x86/boot/edd.c
arch/x86/boot/main.c
arch/x86/boot/memory.c
arch/x86/boot/pm.c
arch/x86/boot/printf.c
arch/x86/boot/regs.c
arch/x86/boot/string.c
arch/x86/boot/tty.c
arch/x86/boot/video.c
arch/x86/boot/video-mode.c
arch/x86/boot/version.c
arch/x86/boot/video-vga.c
arch/x86/boot/video-vesa.c
arch/x86/boot/video-bios.c
arch/x86/boot/cpu.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/cmdline.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/error.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/cpuflags.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/early_serial_console.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/ident_map_64.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/idt_64.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/pgtable_64.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
So it looks like parts of the tree are already built with -std=gnu11
or -std=gnu17, as they rely on the implicit default C language mode
when unspecified. Oops?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 15:47 Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-05 18:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-05 19:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 11:53 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-06 12:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 13:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 17:20 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-06 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 21:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-06 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-06 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 11:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 13:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 16:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-01-07 17:00 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-07 21:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 22:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 22:41 ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-08 8:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-07 22:27 ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-07 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-08 8:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-08 10:31 ` Pavel Machek
2021-01-07 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-08 9:26 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-08 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-08 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 21:20 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2021-01-08 20:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-12 13:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-12 13:31 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-12 13:46 ` David Laight
2021-01-12 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 13:13 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKwvOdmcKjwJkiu+VDWrjQO9RYjv-WEqepQJnLZrY2wtBmEwmg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).