linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip V3 0/8] workqueue: break affinity initiatively
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:09:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111180907.GE2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/yH9+MGa1JCNZ8x@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:16:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> While thinking more about this, I'm thinking a big part of the problem
> is that we're not dinstinguishing between geniuine per-cpu kthreads and
> kthreads that just happen to be per-cpu.
> 
> Geniuine per-cpu kthreads are kthread_bind() and have PF_NO_SETAFFINITY,
> but sadly a lot of non-per-cpu kthreads, that might happen to still be
> per-cpu also have that -- again workqueue does that even to it's unbound
> workers :-(
> 
> Now, anything created by smpboot, is created through
> kthread_create_on_cpu() and that additionally sets to_kthread(p)->flags
> KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU.
> 
> And I'm thinking that might be sufficient, if we modify
> is_per_cpu_kthread() to check that, then we only match smpboot threads
> (which include the hotplug and stopper threads, but notably not the idle
> thread)
> 
> Sadly it appears like io_uring() uses kthread_create_on_cpu() without
> then having any hotplug crud on, so that needs additinoal frobbing.
> 
> Also, init_task is PF_KTHREAD but doesn't have a struct kthread on.. and
> I suppose bound workqueues don't go through this either.
> 
> Let me rummage around a bit...
> 
> This seems to not insta-explode... opinions?

It passes quick tests on -rcu both with and without the rcutorture fixes,
which is encouraging.  I will start a more vigorous test in about an hour.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  include/linux/kthread.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/kthread.c        | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/sched/core.c     |  2 +-
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  4 ++--
>  kernel/smpboot.c        |  1 +
>  kernel/workqueue.c      | 12 +++++++++---
>  6 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h
> index 65b81e0c494d..fdd5a52e35d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kthread.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_cpu(int (*threadfn)(void *data),
>  					  unsigned int cpu,
>  					  const char *namefmt);
>  
> +void kthread_set_per_cpu(struct task_struct *k, bool set);
> +bool kthread_is_per_cpu(struct task_struct *k);
> +
>  /**
>   * kthread_run - create and wake a thread.
>   * @threadfn: the function to run until signal_pending(current).
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index a5eceecd4513..7f081530e459 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -493,11 +493,34 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_cpu(int (*threadfn)(void *data),
>  		return p;
>  	kthread_bind(p, cpu);
>  	/* CPU hotplug need to bind once again when unparking the thread. */
> -	set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &to_kthread(p)->flags);
>  	to_kthread(p)->cpu = cpu;
>  	return p;
>  }
>  
> +void kthread_set_per_cpu(struct task_struct *k, bool set)
> +{
> +	struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(k);
> +	if (!kthread)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (set) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(k->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY));
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(k->nr_cpus_allowed != 1);
> +		set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags);
> +	} else {
> +		clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +bool kthread_is_per_cpu(struct task_struct *k)
> +{
> +	struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(k);
> +	if (!kthread)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * kthread_unpark - unpark a thread created by kthread_create().
>   * @k:		thread created by kthread_create().
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 15d2562118d1..e71f9e44789e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7277,7 +7277,7 @@ static void balance_push(struct rq *rq)
>  	 * Both the cpu-hotplug and stop task are in this case and are
>  	 * required to complete the hotplug process.
>  	 */
> -	if (is_per_cpu_kthread(push_task) || is_migration_disabled(push_task)) {
> +	if (rq->idle == push_task || is_per_cpu_kthread(push_task) || is_migration_disabled(push_task)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If this is the idle task on the outgoing CPU try to wake
>  		 * up the hotplug control thread which might wait for the
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 12ada79d40f3..3679f63e0aa2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -2697,10 +2697,10 @@ static inline bool is_per_cpu_kthread(struct task_struct *p)
>  	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1)
> +	if (!(p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	return true;
> +	return kthread_is_per_cpu(p);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/smpboot.c b/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 2efe1e206167..b0abe575a524 100644
> --- a/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ __smpboot_create_thread(struct smp_hotplug_thread *ht, unsigned int cpu)
>  		kfree(td);
>  		return PTR_ERR(tsk);
>  	}
> +	kthread_set_per_cpu(tsk, true);
>  	/*
>  	 * Park the thread so that it could start right on the CPU
>  	 * when it is available.
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 9880b6c0e272..824276e4fb2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1861,6 +1861,8 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
>  	 */
>  	if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
>  		worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
> +	else
> +		kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, true);
>  
>  	list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
>  	worker->pool = pool;
> @@ -4919,8 +4921,10 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu)
>  
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
>  
> -		for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
> -			WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_active_mask) < 0);
> +		for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
> +			kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, false);
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_possible_mask) < 0);
> +		}
>  
>  		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
>  
> @@ -4972,9 +4976,11 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
>  	 * of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND.  As we're called
>  	 * from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
> +	for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
>  						  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
> +		kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, true);
> +	}
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-26  2:51 [PATCH -tip V3 0/8] workqueue: break affinity initiatively Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 1/8] workqueue: use cpu_possible_mask instead of cpu_active_mask to break affinity Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 2/8] workqueue: Manually break affinity on pool detachment Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 3/8] workqueue: introduce wq_online_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-04 13:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-05  2:41     ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-05  2:53       ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-05  8:23       ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-05 13:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-05 14:37           ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-05 14:40             ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-05 16:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 4/8] workqueue: use wq_online_cpumask in restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 5/8] workqueue: Manually break affinity on hotplug for unbound pool Lai Jiangshan
     [not found]   ` <20201226101631.5448-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-12-27 14:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 6/8] workqueue: reorganize workqueue_online_cpu() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 7/8] workqueue: reorganize workqueue_offline_cpu() unbind_workers() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-26  2:51 ` [PATCH -tip V3 8/8] workqueue: Fix affinity of kworkers when attaching into pool Lai Jiangshan
     [not found]   ` <20201229100639.2086-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-12-29 10:13     ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-08 11:46 ` [PATCH -tip V3 0/8] workqueue: break affinity initiatively Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-11 10:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-01-11 11:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-11 15:00       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-11 17:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-11 18:09         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-01-11 21:50           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-12 17:14             ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-12 23:53               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-15  9:11                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 13:04                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-16  6:00                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 19:21         ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-11 20:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-11 22:47             ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-12  4:33             ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-12 14:53               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-12 15:38                 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-13 11:10                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-13 12:00                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-13 12:57                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-12 17:52               ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-12 14:57           ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-12 15:51             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210111180907.GE2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=cai@redhat.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).