Re: [PATCH v4] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:14:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114151436.o3d6goua62mjyooo@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114103928.GB12284@zn.tnic>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:39:28AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:56:04AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Apologies, that was not my intention.  I've sent a follow up in
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210113174620.958429-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/T/#u
> > since BP picked up v3 in tip x86/entry:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=x86/entry&id=bde718b7e154afc99e1956b18a848401ce8e1f8e
> 
> It is the topmost patch so I can rebase...
> 
> Also, I replicated that text into linkage.h and removed the change over
> SYM_CODE_START and I've got the below.
> 
> Further complaints?
> 
> ---
> From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:46:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/entry: Emit a symbol for register restoring thunk
> 
> Arnd found a randconfig that produces the warning:
> 
>   arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for insn at
>   offset 0x3e
> 
> when building with LLVM_IAS=1 (Clang's integrated assembler). Josh
> notes:
> 
>   With the LLVM assembler not generating section symbols, objtool has no
>   way to reference this code when it generates ORC unwinder entries,
>   because this code is outside of any ELF function.
> 
>   The limitation now being imposed by objtool is that all code must be
>   contained in an ELF symbol.  And .L symbols don't create such symbols.
> 
>   So basically, you can use an .L symbol *inside* a function or a code
>   segment, you just can't use the .L symbol to contain the code using a
>   SYM_*_START/END annotation pair.
> 
> Fangrui notes that this optimization is helpful for reducing image size
> when compiling with -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections. I have
> observed on the order of tens of thousands of symbols for the kernel
> images built with those flags.
> 
> A patch has been authored against GNU binutils to match this behavior
> of not generating unused section symbols ([1]), so this will
> also become a problem for users of GNU binutils once they upgrade to 2.36.
> 
> Omit the .L prefix on a label so that the assembler will emit an entry
> into the symbol table for the label, with STB_LOCAL binding. This
> enables objtool to generate proper unwind info here with LLVM_IAS=1 or
> GNU binutils 2.36+.
> 
>  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>

-- 
Josh