linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray@google.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, "X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:13:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmGS97e4Rj_oW+RnkYAMjycTFQiiPJAfCvKTdxgv2KfEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112010010.GA8239@zn.tnic>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:00 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 04:41:52PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > To be fair: we cannot use
>
> Who's "we"?
>
> > .L-prefixed local because of the objtool limitation.
>
> What objtool limitation? I thought clang's assembler removes .text which
> objtool uses. It worked fine with GNU as so far.

I don't think we need to completely stop using .L prefixes in the
kernel, just this one location since tracking the control flow seems a
little tricky for objtool. Maybe Josh can clarify more if needed?

>
> > The LLVM integrated assembler behavior is a good one
>
> Please explain what "good one" means in that particular context.
>
> > and binutils global maintainers have agreed so H.J. went ahead and
> > implemented it for GNU as x86.
>
> But they don't break old behavior, do they? Or are they removing .text
> unconditionally now too?

Unconditionally. See
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-January/114700.html
where that flag was rejected and the optimization was adopted as the
optimization was obvious to GNU binutils developers. So I suspect this
will become a problem for GNU binutils users as well after the latest
release that contains
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20210105/75dd4a9d/attachment-0001.bin.

> > --generate-unused-section-symbols=[yes|no] as an assembler option has
> > been rejected.
>
> Meaning what exactly? There's no way for clang's integrated assembler to
> even get a cmdline option to not strip .text?

I can clean that up in v5; The section symbols were not generated then
stripped; they were simply never generated.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-12  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 23:21 [PATCH] x86/entry: use STB_GLOBAL for register restoring thunk Nick Desaulniers
2020-12-24  4:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-06  0:43   ` [PATCH v2] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-06  1:58     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-11 20:38       ` [PATCH v3] x86/entry: emit a symbol " Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-11 20:58         ` Fangrui Song
2021-01-11 22:09           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-11 22:16             ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-01-11 22:12         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-12  0:38         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-12  0:41           ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-01-12  1:00             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-12  1:13               ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2021-01-12  1:59                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-12 11:54                   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-12 19:46                     ` [PATCH v4] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-12 21:01                       ` Mark Brown
2021-01-13 16:59                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-13 17:46                           ` [PATCH] Documentation: asm-annotation: clarify .L local symbol names Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-13 19:56                             ` Mark Brown
2021-01-13 17:56                           ` [PATCH v4] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-14 10:39                             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-14 11:36                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-14 13:28                                 ` [PATCH] x86/entry: Remove put_ret_addr_in_rdi THUNK macro argument Borislav Petkov
2021-01-14 15:53                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-19 10:12                                 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2021-01-14 15:14                               ` [PATCH v4] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-13 11:52                       ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Emit " tip-bot2 for Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-19 10:12                       ` tip-bot2 for Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-12 11:47                 ` [PATCH v3] x86/entry: emit " Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKwvOdmGS97e4Rj_oW+RnkYAMjycTFQiiPJAfCvKTdxgv2KfEA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).