LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
       [not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
@ 2021-01-29 18:22 ` Naresh Kamboju
  2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2021-01-30 13:50   ` Jon Hunter
  2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
       [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-01-29 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
	Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.10.12-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06
git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28

No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11)

No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11)

Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kselftest
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* fwts
* kunit
* rcutorture
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
       [not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
  2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
  2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
       [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-01-29 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
       [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
@ 2021-01-30 13:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Machek
  Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, stable

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2021-01-29 12:07:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> CIP testing did not find any problems here:
> 
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
> 
> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Thanks for testing these and letting me know.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
  2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2021-01-30 13:50   ` Jon Hunter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naresh Kamboju
  Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
	Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:52:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

Thanks for testing these and letting me know.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
  2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-01-30 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck
  Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:23:16AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
> 
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
  2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
  2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2021-01-30 13:50   ` Jon Hunter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2021-01-30 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
	Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck


On 29/01/2021 18:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
>> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
Replying here because I don't have the original.

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    12 builds:	12 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    65 tests:	65 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon


-- 
nvpublic

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20210129105912.628174874@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-01-29 18:22 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-30 13:50   ` Jon Hunter
2021-01-29 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-30 13:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
     [not found] ` <20210129125914.GA23853@duo.ucw.cz>
2021-01-30 13:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git