[PATCH 0/3] kunit: support running subsets of test suites from

[PATCH 0/3] kunit: support running subsets of test suites from

[Daniel Latypov]

When using `kunit.py run` to run tests, users must populate a
`kunitconfig` file to select the options the tests are hidden behind and
all their dependencies.

The patch [1] to allow specifying a path to kunitconfig promises to make
this nicer as we can have checked in files corresponding to different
sets of tests.

But it's still annoying 
1) when trying to run a subet of tests
2) when you want to run tests that don't have such a pre-existing
kunitconfig and selecting all the necessary options is tricky.

This patch series aims to alleviate both:
1) `kunit.py run 'my-suite-*'`
I.e. use my current kunitconfig, but just run suites that match this glob
2) `kunit.py run --alltests 'my-suite-*'`
I.e. use allyesconfig so I don't have to worry about writing a
kunitconfig at all (this is a bit overkill, but it works!)

See the first commit message for more details and discussion about
future work.

This patch series also includes a bugfix for a latent bug that can't be
triggered right now but has worse consequences as a result of the
changes needed to plumb in this suite name glob.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210201205514.3943096-1-dlatypov@google.com/

Daniel Latypov (3):
  kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites
  kunit: tool: add support for filtering suites by glob
  kunit: tool: fix unintentional statefulness in run_kernel()

 lib/kunit/Kconfig                   |  1 +
 lib/kunit/executor.c                | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py        | 21 +++++--
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py |  6 +-
 4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


base-commit: 88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598
-- 
2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog

[PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

[Daniel Latypov]

E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name.
  kunit.filter_glob=list*

Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of
suites we intend to run.
So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we
need to do the filtering here in the executor.
It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't
want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules.

This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y.
But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue.

For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies
of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them.

The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider
extending it to a syntax like:
  kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob>
E.g. to run all the del list tests
  kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del*

But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in
test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select
specific suites.
So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
 lib/kunit/Kconfig    |  1 +
 lib/kunit/executor.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/Kconfig b/lib/kunit/Kconfig
index 00909e6a2443..0b5dfb001bac 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/kunit/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 menuconfig KUNIT
 	tristate "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests"
+	select GLOB if KUNIT=y
 	help
 	  Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit
 	  testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index a95742a4ece7..25a891285816 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/glob.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 
 /*
  * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in
@@ -11,14 +13,79 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[];
 
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
 
-static void kunit_print_tap_header(void)
+static char *filter_glob;
+module_param(filter_glob, charp, 0);
+
+static struct kunit_suite * const *
+kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite)
+{
+	int i, n = 0;
+	struct kunit_suite **filtered;
+
+	n = 0;
+	for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
+		if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
+			++n;
+	}
+
+	if (n == 0)
+		return NULL;
+
+	filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!filtered)
+		return NULL;
+
+	n = 0;
+	for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
+		if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
+			filtered[n++] = subsuite[i];
+	}
+	filtered[n] = NULL;
+
+	return filtered;
+}
+
+struct suite_set {
+	struct kunit_suite * const * const *start;
+	struct kunit_suite * const * const *end;
+};
+
+static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite;
+	struct suite_set filtered;
+
+	const size_t max = __kunit_suites_end - __kunit_suites_start;
+
+	if (!filter_glob) {
+		filtered.start = __kunit_suites_start;
+		filtered.end = __kunit_suites_end;
+		return filtered;
+	}
+
+	copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL);
+	filtered.start = copy;
+	if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */
+		filtered.end = copy;
+		return filtered;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
+		filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(__kunit_suites_start[i]);
+		if (filtered_subsuite)
+			*copy++ = filtered_subsuite;
+	}
+	filtered.end = copy;
+	return filtered;
+}
+
+static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
 	int num_of_suites = 0;
 
-	for (suites = __kunit_suites_start;
-	     suites < __kunit_suites_end;
-	     suites++)
+	for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
 		for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
 			num_of_suites++;
 
@@ -30,12 +97,18 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
 
-	kunit_print_tap_header();
+	struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
+
+	kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
+
+	for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
+		__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
 
-	for (suites = __kunit_suites_start;
-	     suites < __kunit_suites_end;
-	     suites++)
-			__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
+	if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
+		for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
+			kfree(suites);
+		kfree(suite_set.start);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog

[PATCH 2/3] kunit: tool: add support for filtering suites by glob

[Daniel Latypov]

This allows running different subsets of tests, e.g.

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec 'list*'
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec 'kunit*'

This passes the "kunit_filter.glob" commandline option to the UML
kernel, which currently only supports filtering by suite name.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py        | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index e808a47c839b..a15ee33bb1f5 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ KunitBuildRequest = namedtuple('KunitBuildRequest',
 			       ['jobs', 'build_dir', 'alltests',
 				'make_options'])
 KunitExecRequest = namedtuple('KunitExecRequest',
-			      ['timeout', 'build_dir', 'alltests'])
+			      ['timeout', 'build_dir', 'alltests', 'filter_glob'])
 KunitParseRequest = namedtuple('KunitParseRequest',
 			       ['raw_output', 'input_data', 'build_dir', 'json'])
 KunitRequest = namedtuple('KunitRequest', ['raw_output','timeout', 'jobs',
-					   'build_dir', 'alltests', 'json',
-					   'make_options'])
+					   'build_dir', 'alltests', 'filter_glob',
+					   'json', 'make_options'])
 
 KernelDirectoryPath = sys.argv[0].split('tools/testing/kunit/')[0]
 
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ def exec_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
 	test_start = time.time()
 	result = linux.run_kernel(
 		timeout=None if request.alltests else request.timeout,
+                filter_glob=request.filter_glob,
 		build_dir=request.build_dir)
 
 	test_end = time.time()
@@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ def run_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
 		return build_result
 
 	exec_request = KunitExecRequest(request.timeout, request.build_dir,
-					request.alltests)
+					request.alltests, request.filter_glob)
 	exec_result = exec_tests(linux, exec_request)
 	if exec_result.status != KunitStatus.SUCCESS:
 		return exec_result
@@ -197,6 +198,14 @@ def add_exec_opts(parser) -> None:
 			    type=int,
 			    default=300,
 			    metavar='timeout')
+	parser.add_argument('filter_glob',
+			    help='maximum number of seconds to allow for all tests '
+			    'to run. This does not include time taken to build the '
+			    'tests.',
+			    type=str,
+			    nargs='?',
+			    default='',
+			    metavar='filter_glob')
 
 def add_parse_opts(parser) -> None:
 	parser.add_argument('--raw_output', help='don\'t format output from kernel',
@@ -263,6 +272,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
 				       cli_args.jobs,
 				       cli_args.build_dir,
 				       cli_args.alltests,
+				       cli_args.filter_glob,
 				       cli_args.json,
 				       cli_args.make_options)
 		result = run_tests(linux, request)
@@ -304,7 +314,8 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
 
 		exec_request = KunitExecRequest(cli_args.timeout,
 						cli_args.build_dir,
-						cli_args.alltests)
+						cli_args.alltests,
+						cli_args.filter_glob)
 		exec_result = exec_tests(linux, exec_request)
 		parse_request = KunitParseRequest(cli_args.raw_output,
 						  exec_result.result,
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
index 2076a5a2d060..71b1942f5ccd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
@@ -199,8 +199,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
 			return False
 		return self.validate_config(build_dir)
 
-	def run_kernel(self, args=[], build_dir='', timeout=None) -> Iterator[str]:
+	def run_kernel(self, args=[], build_dir='', filter_glob='', timeout=None) -> Iterator[str]:
 		args.extend(['mem=1G', 'console=tty'])
+		if filter_glob:
+			args.append('kunit.filter_glob='+filter_glob)
 		self._ops.linux_bin(args, timeout, build_dir)
 		outfile = get_outfile_path(build_dir)
 		subprocess.call(['stty', 'sane'])
-- 
2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog

[PATCH 3/3] kunit: tool: fix unintentional statefulness in run_kernel()

[Daniel Latypov]

This is a bug that has been present since the first version of this
code.
Using [] as a default parameter is dangerous, since it's mutable.

Example using the REPL:
>>> def bad(param = []):
...     param.append(len(param))
...     print(param)
...
>>> bad()
[0]
>>> bad()
[0, 1]

This wasn't a concern in the past since it would just keep appending the
same values to it.

E.g. before, `args` would just grow in size like:
  [mem=1G', 'console=tty']
  [mem=1G', 'console=tty', mem=1G', 'console=tty']

But with now filter_glob, this is more dangerous, e.g.
  run_kernel(filter_glob='my-test*') # default modified here
  run_kernel()			     # filter_glob still applies here!
That earlier `filter_glob` will affect all subsequent calls that don't
specify `args`.

Note: currently the kunit tool only calls run_kernel() at most once, so
it's not possible to trigger any negative side-effects right now.

Fixes: 6ebf5866f2e8 ("kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
index 71b1942f5ccd..6dd3cf6e8efa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
@@ -199,7 +199,9 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
 			return False
 		return self.validate_config(build_dir)
 
-	def run_kernel(self, args=[], build_dir='', filter_glob='', timeout=None) -> Iterator[str]:
+	def run_kernel(self, args=None, build_dir='', filter_glob='', timeout=None) -> Iterator[str]:
+		if not args:
+			args = []
 		args.extend(['mem=1G', 'console=tty'])
 		if filter_glob:
 			args.append('kunit.filter_glob='+filter_glob)
-- 
2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

[Dan Carpenter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2363 bytes --]

Hi Daniel,

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Latypov/kunit-support-running-subsets-of-test-suites-from/20210204-074405
base:   88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598
config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210202 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

smatch warnings:
lib/kunit/executor.c:110 kunit_run_all_tests() error: double free of 'suite_set.start'

vim +110 lib/kunit/executor.c

8c0d884986ba22 Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04   96  int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   97  {
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   98  	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   99  
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  100  	struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04  101  
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  102  	kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  103  
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  104  	for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  105  		__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  106  
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  107  	if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  108  		for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This will free "suite_set.start" will in the first iteration through the
loop

d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  109  			kfree(suites);
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03 @110  		kfree(suite_set.start);
                                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
and then double free it.

d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  111  	}
d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  112  
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  113  	return 0;
aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  114  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 33996 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

[Daniel Latypov]

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Latypov/kunit-support-running-subsets-of-test-suites-from/20210204-074405
> base:   88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598
> config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210202 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> smatch warnings:
> lib/kunit/executor.c:110 kunit_run_all_tests() error: double free of 'suite_set.start'
>
> vim +110 lib/kunit/executor.c
>
> 8c0d884986ba22 Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04   96  int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   97  {
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   98          struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   99
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  100          struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
> 45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04  101
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  102          kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  103
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  104          for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  105                  __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  106
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  107          if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  108                  for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
>                                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This will free "suite_set.start" will in the first iteration through the
> loop

Ah, the loop is supposed to contain `kfree(*suites)`.
I'll fix the patch and resend.

I'm not familiar with conventions but it feels like adding Reported-by
on the amended patch would almost imply the report suggested the need
for the ability to filter suites.
So I'll add an informal attribution in the cover letter.

Thanks!

>
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  109                          kfree(suites);
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03 @110                  kfree(suite_set.start);
>                                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and then double free it.
>
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  111          }
> d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  112
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  113          return 0;
> aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  114  }
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:30:43AM -0800, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Latypov/kunit-support-running-subsets-of-test-suites-from/20210204-074405 
> > base:   88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598
> > config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210202 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >
> > smatch warnings:
> > lib/kunit/executor.c:110 kunit_run_all_tests() error: double free of 'suite_set.start'
> >
> > vim +110 lib/kunit/executor.c
> >
> > 8c0d884986ba22 Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04   96  int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   97  {
> > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   98          struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04   99
> > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  100          struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
> > 45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04  101
> > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  102          kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
> > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  103
> > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  104          for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
> > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  105                  __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
> > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire    2020-08-04  106
> > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  107          if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
> > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov  2021-02-03  108                  for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
> >                                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This will free "suite_set.start" will in the first iteration through the
> > loop
> 
> Ah, the loop is supposed to contain `kfree(*suites)`.
> I'll fix the patch and resend.
> 
> I'm not familiar with conventions but it feels like adding Reported-by
> on the amended patch would almost imply the report suggested the need
> for the ability to filter suites.
> So I'll add an informal attribution in the cover letter.
> 
> Thanks!

These emails are autogenerated by the kbuild bot and I just look them
over and hit forward.

regards,
dan carpenter