linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"ivecera@redhat.com" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	"nikolay@nvidia.com" <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	"roopa@nvidia.com" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	"alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk" <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] switchdev: mrp: Extend ring_role_mrp and in_role_mrp
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:09:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217160923.fimumxafloc6276i@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210217155845.oegbmsnxykkqc6um@soft-dev3.localdomain>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > If a driver implements full MRP offload for a ring/interconnect
> > manager/automanager, should it return -EOPNOTSUPP when sw_backup=false?
> 
> In that case it should return 0.
> So if the driver can:
> - fully support MRP, when sw_backup = false, return 0. Then end of story.
> - partially support MRP, when sw_backup = false, return -EOPNOTSUPP,
>                          when sw_backup = true, return 0.
> - no support at all, return -EOPNOTSUPP.

Damn, I asked the wrong question.
I meant to ask about what it should return when sw_backup=true.
But you answered anyway that if it returns 0 when sw_backup=false, it
can simply not deal with the case where sw_backup=true, because that is
never supposed to happen.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-16 21:41 [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_* Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-16 21:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] switchdev: mrp: Remove CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 10:26   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-16 21:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] switchdev: mrp: Extend ring_role_mrp and in_role_mrp Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 10:34   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-17 15:58     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 16:09       ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-02-16 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] bridge: mrp: Add 'enum br_mrp_hw_support' Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-16 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/8] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev to detect better the errors Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 10:56   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-17 16:02     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-16 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] bridge: mrp: Update br_mrp to use new return values of br_mrp_switchdev Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 10:59   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-17 16:18     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-16 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] net: mscc: ocelot: Add support for MRP Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 11:14   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-17 16:25     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 11:51   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-16 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/8] net: dsa: add MRP support Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 11:23   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-16 21:42 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] net: dsa: felix: Add support for MRP Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-17 10:24   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-16 23:00 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_* patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210217160923.fimumxafloc6276i@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).