linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] x86/mm/tlb: Open-code on_each_cpu_cond_mask() for tlb_is_not_lazy()
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:28:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218082827.GA340059@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29878BDA-1B02-4EAB-A7D3-5FEFCC73B2BE@vmware.com>

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:24:23AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> In general, thanks for the feedback (I will reply after I follow your
> feedback). I do have a general question - I thought it was decided that
> clarity should be preferred over following the 80-column limit. Please let
> me know if I misunderstood.

To quote the coding style document:

"The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80 columns.

Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible chunks,
unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
not hide information."

While a lot of the decisions are subjective, just spilling over for no
good reason does not significantly improve readability in general.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 22:16 [PATCH v5 0/8] x86/tlb: Concurrent TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many_cond() Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 18:49     ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 16:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 18:53     ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 18:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 19:04         ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-17  1:02         ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 12:55           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-18  8:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18  9:36     ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 11:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] x86/mm/tlb: Unify flush_tlb_func_local() and flush_tlb_func_remote() Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] x86/mm/tlb: Open-code on_each_cpu_cond_mask() for tlb_is_not_lazy() Nadav Amit
2021-02-18  8:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18  8:24     ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18  8:28       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 19:17     ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] x86/mm/tlb: Privatize cpu_tlbstate Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] x86/mm/tlb: Do not make is_lazy dirty for no reason Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] cpumask: Mark functions as pure Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] x86/mm/tlb: Remove unnecessary uses of the inline keyword Nadav Amit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210218082827.GA340059@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).