From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many_cond()
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:59:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCwWLSRVB1RG/NHm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <457D8FBC-8F64-48E9-B9E2-1A316DB0C2B6@vmware.com>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:53:09PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I can explain it yet. It did get me looking at
> > on_each_cpu() and it appears that wants to be converted too, something
> > like the below perhaps.
>
> Looks like a good cleanup, but I cannot say I understand the problem and how
> it would solve it. Err...
Yeah, me neither. Bit of a mystery so far.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-16 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 22:16 [PATCH v5 0/8] x86/tlb: Concurrent TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many_cond() Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 18:49 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 18:53 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-02-16 19:04 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-17 1:02 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-18 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 9:36 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] x86/mm/tlb: Unify flush_tlb_func_local() and flush_tlb_func_remote() Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] x86/mm/tlb: Open-code on_each_cpu_cond_mask() for tlb_is_not_lazy() Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 8:24 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 19:17 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] x86/mm/tlb: Privatize cpu_tlbstate Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] x86/mm/tlb: Do not make is_lazy dirty for no reason Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] cpumask: Mark functions as pure Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] x86/mm/tlb: Remove unnecessary uses of the inline keyword Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YCwWLSRVB1RG/NHm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).