Re: [PATCH 03/40] staging: rtl8723bs: replace RT_TRACE with public printk wrappers in core/rtw_eeprom.c

[Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:14:18PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:55:51PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > > > replace private macro RT_TRACE for tracing with in-kernel
> > > > pr_* printk wrappers
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c | 26 ++++++++++-----------
> > > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c
> > > > index 3cbd65dee741..6176d741d60e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_eeprom.c
> > > > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void shift_out_bits(_adapter *padapter, u16 data, u16 count)
> > > >  _func_enter_;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (padapter->bSurpriseRemoved == true) {
> > > > -		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_eeprom_c_, _drv_err_, ("padapter->bSurpriseRemoved==true"));
> > > > +		pr_err("%s padapter->bSurpriseRemoved==true", DRIVER_PREFIX);
> > > 
> > > As Dan said, this is not the same thing.  You are now always printing
> > > out this mess, when before you were not unless you explicitly enabled
> > > "tracing".
> > 
> > RT_TRACE is enabled if is defined the symbol DEBUG_RTL871X. It doesn't seem to be related 
> > to tracing. DEBUG_RTL871X is never declared, is commented out in rtl8723bs/include/autoconf.h
> 
> That's a good sign this is never used and should just all be removed.
> 
> > that's why RT_TRACE is never printed. If we try to uncomment the symbol definition we have some
> > comiling errors..
> 
> What errors do you get?
> 
> > > And you are sending it to the error log?
> > > 
> > > And finally, drivers should never be using pr_*() for messages, they
> > > should be using dev_*() instead as they are a driver and have access to
> > > a device pointer.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > I still wonder what's best...
> 
> Just delete them all please, they are obviously not used as no one
> rebuilds the source just for this type of thing.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

I will send a brand new patchset, not a v2, for the pourpose is changed.

Thank you,

fabio