[PATCH] fs: btrfs: Remove repeated struct declaration

[PATCH] fs: btrfs: Remove repeated struct declaration

[Wan Jiabing]

struct btrfs_inode is declared twice. One is declared at 67th line.
The blew declaration is not needed. Remove the duplicate.
struct btrfs_fs_info should be declared in the forward declarations.
Move it to the forward declarations.

Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
index 824640cb0ace..227215a5722c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ enum {
 struct btrfs_root;
 struct btrfs_inode;
 struct btrfs_io_bio;
+struct btrfs_fs_info;
 struct io_failure_record;
 struct extent_io_tree;
 
@@ -270,9 +271,6 @@ struct bio *btrfs_io_bio_alloc(unsigned int nr_iovecs);
 struct bio *btrfs_bio_clone(struct bio *bio);
 struct bio *btrfs_bio_clone_partial(struct bio *orig, int offset, int size);
 
-struct btrfs_fs_info;
-struct btrfs_inode;
-
 int repair_io_failure(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 ino, u64 start,
 		      u64 length, u64 logical, struct page *page,
 		      unsigned int pg_offset, int mirror_num);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Remove repeated struct declaration

[Nikolay Borisov]

On 1.04.21 г. 11:03, Wan Jiabing wrote:
> struct btrfs_inode is declared twice. One is declared at 67th line.
> The blew declaration is not needed. Remove the duplicate.
> struct btrfs_fs_info should be declared in the forward declarations.
> Move it to the forward declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>

Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Remove repeated struct declaration

[David Sterba]

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:03:39PM +0800, Wan Jiabing wrote:
> struct btrfs_inode is declared twice. One is declared at 67th line.
> The blew declaration is not needed. Remove the duplicate.
> struct btrfs_fs_info should be declared in the forward declarations.
> Move it to the forward declarations.

I've reworded the changelog a bit, patch added to misc-next, thanks.