linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation
@ 2021-04-13  1:37 brookxu
  2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: brookxu @ 2021-04-13  1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel

From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>

The existing data structure is not very convenient for
expansion, and part of the code can be saved. Here, try
to optimize, which can make the code more concise and
easy to expand.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
---
 include/linux/delayacct.h | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 kernel/delayacct.c        |  93 ++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/delayacct.h b/include/linux/delayacct.h
index 2d3bdcc..33f6c84 100644
--- a/include/linux/delayacct.h
+++ b/include/linux/delayacct.h
@@ -2,12 +2,15 @@
 /* delayacct.h - per-task delay accounting
  *
  * Copyright (C) Shailabh Nagar, IBM Corp. 2006
+ * Copyright (C) Chunguang Xu, Tencent Corp. 2021
  */
 
 #ifndef _LINUX_DELAYACCT_H
 #define _LINUX_DELAYACCT_H
 
 #include <uapi/linux/taskstats.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 
 /*
  * Per-task flags relevant to delay accounting
@@ -15,71 +18,44 @@
  * Used to set current->delays->flags
  */
 #define DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN	0x00000001	/* I am doing a swapin */
-#define DELAYACCT_PF_BLKIO	0x00000002	/* I am waiting on IO */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
+
+enum delayacct_item {
+	DELAYACCT_BLKIO,     /* block IO latency */
+	DELAYACCT_SWAPIN,    /* swapin IO latency*/
+	DELAYACCT_THRASHING, /* pagecache thrashing IO latency*/
+	DELAYACCT_FREEPAGES, /* memory reclaim latency*/
+	DELAYACCT_NR_ITEMS
+};
+
+struct delayacct_count {
+	u64 start;  /* start timestamp of XXX operation */
+	u32 count;  /* incremented on every XXX operation */
+	u64 delay;  /* accumulated delay time in nanoseconds */
+	u64 max;    /* maximum latency of XXX operation */
+};
+
 struct task_delay_info {
 	raw_spinlock_t	lock;
 	unsigned int	flags;	/* Private per-task flags */
-
-	/* For each stat XXX, add following, aligned appropriately
-	 *
-	 * struct timespec XXX_start, XXX_end;
-	 * u64 XXX_delay;
-	 * u32 XXX_count;
-	 *
-	 * Atomicity of updates to XXX_delay, XXX_count protected by
-	 * single lock above (split into XXX_lock if contention is an issue).
-	 */
-
-	/*
-	 * XXX_count is incremented on every XXX operation, the delay
-	 * associated with the operation is added to XXX_delay.
-	 * XXX_delay contains the accumulated delay time in nanoseconds.
-	 */
-	u64 blkio_start;	/* Shared by blkio, swapin */
-	u64 blkio_delay;	/* wait for sync block io completion */
-	u64 swapin_delay;	/* wait for swapin block io completion */
-	u32 blkio_count;	/* total count of the number of sync block */
-				/* io operations performed */
-	u32 swapin_count;	/* total count of the number of swapin block */
-				/* io operations performed */
-
-	u64 freepages_start;
-	u64 freepages_delay;	/* wait for memory reclaim */
-
-	u64 thrashing_start;
-	u64 thrashing_delay;	/* wait for thrashing page */
-
-	u32 freepages_count;	/* total count of memory reclaim */
-	u32 thrashing_count;	/* total count of thrash waits */
+	struct delayacct_count delays[DELAYACCT_NR_ITEMS];
 };
-#endif
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
 extern int delayacct_on;	/* Delay accounting turned on/off */
 extern struct kmem_cache *delayacct_cache;
 extern void delayacct_init(void);
 extern void __delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_struct *);
-extern void __delayacct_tsk_exit(struct task_struct *);
-extern void __delayacct_blkio_start(void);
-extern void __delayacct_blkio_end(struct task_struct *);
-extern int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *, struct task_struct *);
-extern __u64 __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *);
-extern void __delayacct_freepages_start(void);
-extern void __delayacct_freepages_end(void);
-extern void __delayacct_thrashing_start(void);
-extern void __delayacct_thrashing_end(void);
-
-static inline int delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io(struct task_struct *p)
+extern int  __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern u64  __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void __delayacct_end(struct task_delay_info *delays, int item);
+
+extern int  proc_delayacct_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
+			struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task);
+
+static inline void __delayacct_start(struct task_delay_info *delays, int item)
 {
-	if (p->delays)
-		return (p->delays->flags & DELAYACCT_PF_BLKIO);
-	else
-		return 0;
+	delays->delays[item].start = ktime_get_ns();
 }
 
 static inline void delayacct_set_flag(int flag)
@@ -112,22 +88,7 @@ static inline void delayacct_tsk_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	tsk->delays = NULL;
 }
 
-static inline void delayacct_blkio_start(void)
-{
-	delayacct_set_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_BLKIO);
-	if (current->delays)
-		__delayacct_blkio_start();
-}
-
-static inline void delayacct_blkio_end(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	if (p->delays)
-		__delayacct_blkio_end(p);
-	delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_BLKIO);
-}
-
-static inline int delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d,
-					struct task_struct *tsk)
+static inline int delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	if (!delayacct_on || !tsk->delays)
 		return 0;
@@ -141,31 +102,52 @@ static inline __u64 delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline void delayacct_blkio_start(void)
+{
+	if (current->delays) {
+		if (current->delays->flags & DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN)
+			__delayacct_start(current->delays, DELAYACCT_SWAPIN);
+		else
+			__delayacct_start(current->delays, DELAYACCT_BLKIO);
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void delayacct_blkio_end(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	if (p->delays) {
+		if (p->delays->flags & DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN)
+			__delayacct_end(p->delays, DELAYACCT_SWAPIN);
+		else
+			__delayacct_end(p->delays, DELAYACCT_BLKIO);
+	}
+}
+
 static inline void delayacct_freepages_start(void)
 {
 	if (current->delays)
-		__delayacct_freepages_start();
+		__delayacct_start(current->delays, DELAYACCT_FREEPAGES);
 }
 
 static inline void delayacct_freepages_end(void)
 {
 	if (current->delays)
-		__delayacct_freepages_end();
+		__delayacct_end(current->delays, DELAYACCT_FREEPAGES);
 }
 
 static inline void delayacct_thrashing_start(void)
 {
 	if (current->delays)
-		__delayacct_thrashing_start();
+		__delayacct_start(current->delays, DELAYACCT_THRASHING);
 }
 
 static inline void delayacct_thrashing_end(void)
 {
 	if (current->delays)
-		__delayacct_thrashing_end();
+		__delayacct_end(current->delays, DELAYACCT_THRASHING);
 }
 
 #else
+
 static inline void delayacct_set_flag(int flag)
 {}
 static inline void delayacct_clear_flag(int flag)
@@ -176,17 +158,14 @@ static inline void delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {}
 static inline void delayacct_tsk_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {}
+static inline int  delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{ return 0; }
+static inline u64  delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{ return 0; }
 static inline void delayacct_blkio_start(void)
 {}
 static inline void delayacct_blkio_end(struct task_struct *p)
 {}
-static inline int delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d,
-					struct task_struct *tsk)
-{ return 0; }
-static inline __u64 delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{ return 0; }
-static inline int delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io(struct task_struct *p)
-{ return 0; }
 static inline void delayacct_freepages_start(void)
 {}
 static inline void delayacct_freepages_end(void)
diff --git a/kernel/delayacct.c b/kernel/delayacct.c
index 27725754..ec580cb 100644
--- a/kernel/delayacct.c
+++ b/kernel/delayacct.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* delayacct.c - per-task delay accounting
  *
  * Copyright (C) Shailabh Nagar, IBM Corp. 2006
+ * Copyright (C) Chunguang Xu, Tencent Corp. 2021
  */
 
 #include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -42,48 +43,24 @@ void __delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
  * Finish delay accounting for a statistic using its timestamps (@start),
  * accumalator (@total) and @count
  */
-static void delayacct_end(raw_spinlock_t *lock, u64 *start, u64 *total,
-			  u32 *count)
+void __delayacct_end(struct task_delay_info *delays, int item)
 {
-	s64 ns = ktime_get_ns() - *start;
+	struct delayacct_count *delay = &delays->delays[item];
+	u64 ns = ktime_get_ns() - delay->start;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (ns > 0) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
-		*total += ns;
-		(*count)++;
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&delays->lock, flags);
+		delay->max = max(delay->max, ns);
+		delay->delay += ns;
+		delay->count++;
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&delays->lock, flags);
 	}
 }
 
-void __delayacct_blkio_start(void)
-{
-	current->delays->blkio_start = ktime_get_ns();
-}
-
-/*
- * We cannot rely on the `current` macro, as we haven't yet switched back to
- * the process being woken.
- */
-void __delayacct_blkio_end(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	struct task_delay_info *delays = p->delays;
-	u64 *total;
-	u32 *count;
-
-	if (p->delays->flags & DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN) {
-		total = &delays->swapin_delay;
-		count = &delays->swapin_count;
-	} else {
-		total = &delays->blkio_delay;
-		count = &delays->blkio_count;
-	}
-
-	delayacct_end(&delays->lock, &delays->blkio_start, total, count);
-}
-
 int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
+	struct delayacct_count *delays = tsk->delays->delays;
 	u64 utime, stime, stimescaled, utimescaled;
 	unsigned long long t2, t3;
 	unsigned long flags, t1;
@@ -120,58 +97,32 @@ int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	/* zero XXX_total, non-zero XXX_count implies XXX stat overflowed */
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
-	tmp = d->blkio_delay_total + tsk->delays->blkio_delay;
+	tmp = d->blkio_delay_total + delays[DELAYACCT_BLKIO].delay;
 	d->blkio_delay_total = (tmp < d->blkio_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
-	tmp = d->swapin_delay_total + tsk->delays->swapin_delay;
+	tmp = d->swapin_delay_total + delays[DELAYACCT_SWAPIN].delay;
 	d->swapin_delay_total = (tmp < d->swapin_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
-	tmp = d->freepages_delay_total + tsk->delays->freepages_delay;
+	tmp = d->freepages_delay_total + delays[DELAYACCT_FREEPAGES].delay;
 	d->freepages_delay_total = (tmp < d->freepages_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
-	tmp = d->thrashing_delay_total + tsk->delays->thrashing_delay;
+	tmp = d->thrashing_delay_total + delays[DELAYACCT_THRASHING].delay;
 	d->thrashing_delay_total = (tmp < d->thrashing_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
-	d->blkio_count += tsk->delays->blkio_count;
-	d->swapin_count += tsk->delays->swapin_count;
-	d->freepages_count += tsk->delays->freepages_count;
-	d->thrashing_count += tsk->delays->thrashing_count;
+	d->blkio_count += delays[DELAYACCT_BLKIO].count;
+	d->swapin_count += delays[DELAYACCT_SWAPIN].count;
+	d->freepages_count += delays[DELAYACCT_FREEPAGES].count;
+	d->thrashing_count += delays[DELAYACCT_THRASHING].count;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-__u64 __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
+u64 __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	__u64 ret;
+	u64 ret;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
-	ret = nsec_to_clock_t(tsk->delays->blkio_delay +
-				tsk->delays->swapin_delay);
+	ret = nsec_to_clock_t(tsk->delays->delays[DELAYACCT_BLKIO].delay +
+			      tsk->delays->delays[DELAYACCT_SWAPIN].delay);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void __delayacct_freepages_start(void)
-{
-	current->delays->freepages_start = ktime_get_ns();
-}
-
-void __delayacct_freepages_end(void)
-{
-	delayacct_end(
-		&current->delays->lock,
-		&current->delays->freepages_start,
-		&current->delays->freepages_delay,
-		&current->delays->freepages_count);
-}
-
-void __delayacct_thrashing_start(void)
-{
-	current->delays->thrashing_start = ktime_get_ns();
-}
-
-void __delayacct_thrashing_end(void)
-{
-	delayacct_end(&current->delays->lock,
-		      &current->delays->thrashing_start,
-		      &current->delays->thrashing_delay,
-		      &current->delays->thrashing_count);
-}
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info
  2021-04-13  1:37 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation brookxu
@ 2021-04-13  1:37 ` brookxu
  2021-04-13  6:14   ` kernel test robot
                     ` (2 more replies)
  2021-04-13 23:19 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation kernel test robot
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: brookxu @ 2021-04-13  1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel

From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>

Many distributions do not install the getdelay tool by
default, similar to task_io_accounting, adding a proc
file to make access easier.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c     |  7 +++++++
 kernel/delayacct.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index b3422cd..4de261a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
 #include <linux/posix-timers.h>
 #include <linux/time_namespace.h>
 #include <linux/resctrl.h>
+#include <linux/delayacct.h>
 #include <trace/events/oom.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "fd.h"
@@ -3244,6 +3245,9 @@ static int proc_stack_depth(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING
 	ONE("io",	S_IRUSR, proc_tgid_io_accounting),
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
+	ONE("delays",	S_IRUSR, proc_delayacct_show),
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
 	REG("uid_map",    S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_uid_map_operations),
 	REG("gid_map",    S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_gid_map_operations),
@@ -3583,6 +3587,9 @@ static int proc_tid_comm_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING
 	ONE("io",	S_IRUSR, proc_tid_io_accounting),
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
+	ONE("delays",	S_IRUSR, proc_delayacct_show),
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
 	REG("uid_map",    S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_uid_map_operations),
 	REG("gid_map",    S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_gid_map_operations),
diff --git a/kernel/delayacct.c b/kernel/delayacct.c
index ec580cb..990af3b 100644
--- a/kernel/delayacct.c
+++ b/kernel/delayacct.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/sysctl.h>
 #include <linux/delayacct.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
 
 int delayacct_on __read_mostly = 1;	/* Delay accounting turned on/off */
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(delayacct_on);
@@ -26,6 +27,18 @@ static int __init delayacct_setup_disable(char *str)
 }
 __setup("nodelayacct", delayacct_setup_disable);
 
+struct delayacct_stat {
+	const char *name;
+	unsigned int idx;
+};
+
+struct delayacct_stat delayacct_stats[] = {
+	{"blkio", DELAYACCT_BLKIO},
+	{"swapin", DELAYACCT_SWAPIN},
+	{"pagecache_thrashing", DELAYACCT_THRASHING},
+	{"mem_reclaim", DELAYACCT_FREEPAGES}
+};
+
 void delayacct_init(void)
 {
 	delayacct_cache = KMEM_CACHE(task_delay_info, SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT);
@@ -126,3 +139,31 @@ u64 __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#define K(x) ((x) / 1000)
+
+int proc_delayacct_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
+		       struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	struct delayacct_count *delays;
+	int idx;
+
+	if (!task->delays)
+		return 0;
+
+	delays = task->delays->delays;
+	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(delayacct_stats); idx++) {
+		u32 item = delayacct_stats[idx].idx;
+		u64 mean = 0;
+
+		if (delays[item].count)
+			mean = div_u64(delays[item].delay, delays[item].count);
+
+		seq_printf(m, "%s %llu %llu %u %llu\n",
+			   delayacct_stats[idx].name,
+			   K(mean),
+			   K(delays[item].max),
+			   delays[item].count,
+			   K(delays[item].delay));
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info
  2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
@ 2021-04-13  6:14   ` kernel test robot
  2021-04-13  6:14   ` [RFC PATCH] delayacct: delayacct_stats[] can be static kernel test robot
  2021-04-13 21:26   ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-04-13  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brookxu, adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel; +Cc: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1709 bytes --]

Hi brookxu,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v5.12-rc7 next-20210412]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 89698becf06d341a700913c3d89ce2a914af69a2
config: x86_64-randconfig-s021-20210413 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.3-280-g2cd6d34e-dirty
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/7023a409dec95195a0e3360a36e8cb66363a9457
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
        git checkout 7023a409dec95195a0e3360a36e8cb66363a9457
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/delayacct.c:35:23: sparse: sparse: symbol 'delayacct_stats' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 36937 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [RFC PATCH] delayacct: delayacct_stats[] can be static
  2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
  2021-04-13  6:14   ` kernel test robot
@ 2021-04-13  6:14   ` kernel test robot
  2021-04-13 21:26   ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-04-13  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brookxu, adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel; +Cc: kbuild-all


Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 delayacct.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/delayacct.c b/kernel/delayacct.c
index b8d719fbfc404..2505aa9f87f61 100644
--- a/kernel/delayacct.c
+++ b/kernel/delayacct.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct delayacct_stat {
 	unsigned int idx;
 };
 
-struct delayacct_stat delayacct_stats[] = {
+static struct delayacct_stat delayacct_stats[] = {
 	{"blkio", DELAYACCT_BLKIO},
 	{"swapin", DELAYACCT_SWAPIN},
 	{"pagecache_thrashing", DELAYACCT_THRASHING},

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info
  2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
  2021-04-13  6:14   ` kernel test robot
  2021-04-13  6:14   ` [RFC PATCH] delayacct: delayacct_stats[] can be static kernel test robot
@ 2021-04-13 21:26   ` kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-04-13 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brookxu, adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel
  Cc: kbuild-all, clang-built-linux

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2486 bytes --]

Hi brookxu,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.12-rc7 next-20210413]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 89698becf06d341a700913c3d89ce2a914af69a2
config: arm-randconfig-r005-20210413 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9829f5e6b1bca9b61efc629770d28bb9014dec45)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/7023a409dec95195a0e3360a36e8cb66363a9457
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
        git checkout 7023a409dec95195a0e3360a36e8cb66363a9457
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   ld.lld: warning: lld uses blx instruction, no object with architecture supporting feature detected
   ld.lld: warning: lld uses blx instruction, no object with architecture supporting feature detected
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __aeabi_uldivmod
   >>> referenced by delayacct.c
   >>>               delayacct.o:(proc_delayacct_show) in archive kernel/built-in.a
   >>> referenced by delayacct.c
   >>>               delayacct.o:(proc_delayacct_show) in archive kernel/built-in.a
   >>> referenced by delayacct.c
   >>>               delayacct.o:(proc_delayacct_show) in archive kernel/built-in.a
   >>> did you mean: __aeabi_uidivmod
   >>> defined in: arch/arm/lib/lib.a(lib1funcs.o)

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 35718 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation
  2021-04-13  1:37 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation brookxu
  2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
@ 2021-04-13 23:19 ` kernel test robot
  2021-04-14  1:24 ` kernel test robot
  2021-04-19  7:01 ` Balbir Singh
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-04-13 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brookxu, adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel; +Cc: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6426 bytes --]

Hi brookxu,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.12-rc7 next-20210413]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 89698becf06d341a700913c3d89ce2a914af69a2
config: microblaze-randconfig-r026-20210413 (attached as .config)
compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/37860ad48e2e1c1b332172849833ebb49802d0a8
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
        git checkout 37860ad48e2e1c1b332172849833ebb49802d0a8
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=microblaze 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c: In function 'cgroupstats_build':
>> kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c:730:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     730 |    if (delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io(tsk))
         |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io +730 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c

0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  676  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  677  /**
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  678   * cgroupstats_build - build and fill cgroupstats
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  679   * @stats: cgroupstats to fill information into
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  680   * @dentry: A dentry entry belonging to the cgroup for which stats have
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  681   * been requested.
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  682   *
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  683   * Build and fill cgroupstats so that taskstats can export it to user
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  684   * space.
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  685   */
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  686  int cgroupstats_build(struct cgroupstats *stats, struct dentry *dentry)
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  687  {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  688  	struct kernfs_node *kn = kernfs_node_from_dentry(dentry);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  689  	struct cgroup *cgrp;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  690  	struct css_task_iter it;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  691  	struct task_struct *tsk;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  692  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  693  	/* it should be kernfs_node belonging to cgroupfs and is a directory */
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  694  	if (dentry->d_sb->s_type != &cgroup_fs_type || !kn ||
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  695  	    kernfs_type(kn) != KERNFS_DIR)
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  696  		return -EINVAL;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  697  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  698  	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  699  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  700  	/*
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  701  	 * We aren't being called from kernfs and there's no guarantee on
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  702  	 * @kn->priv's validity.  For this and css_tryget_online_from_dir(),
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  703  	 * @kn->priv is RCU safe.  Let's do the RCU dancing.
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  704  	 */
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  705  	rcu_read_lock();
e0aed7c74f0bf6 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  706  	cgrp = rcu_dereference(*(void __rcu __force **)&kn->priv);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  707  	if (!cgrp || cgroup_is_dead(cgrp)) {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  708  		rcu_read_unlock();
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  709  		mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  710  		return -ENOENT;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  711  	}
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  712  	rcu_read_unlock();
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  713  
bc2fb7ed089ffd Tejun Heo 2017-05-15  714  	css_task_iter_start(&cgrp->self, 0, &it);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  715  	while ((tsk = css_task_iter_next(&it))) {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  716  		switch (tsk->state) {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  717  		case TASK_RUNNING:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  718  			stats->nr_running++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  719  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  720  		case TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  721  			stats->nr_sleeping++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  722  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  723  		case TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  724  			stats->nr_uninterruptible++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  725  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  726  		case TASK_STOPPED:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  727  			stats->nr_stopped++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  728  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  729  		default:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27 @730  			if (delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io(tsk))
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  731  				stats->nr_io_wait++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  732  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  733  		}
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  734  	}
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  735  	css_task_iter_end(&it);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  736  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  737  	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  738  	return 0;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  739  }
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  740  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 28084 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation
  2021-04-13  1:37 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation brookxu
  2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
  2021-04-13 23:19 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation kernel test robot
@ 2021-04-14  1:24 ` kernel test robot
  2021-04-19  7:01 ` Balbir Singh
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-04-14  1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brookxu, adobriyan, bsingharora, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel
  Cc: kbuild-all, clang-built-linux

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6507 bytes --]

Hi brookxu,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.12-rc7 next-20210413]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 89698becf06d341a700913c3d89ce2a914af69a2
config: x86_64-randconfig-a014-20210413 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9829f5e6b1bca9b61efc629770d28bb9014dec45)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/37860ad48e2e1c1b332172849833ebb49802d0a8
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review brookxu/delayacct-refactor-the-code-to-simplify-the-implementation/20210413-093934
        git checkout 37860ad48e2e1c1b332172849833ebb49802d0a8
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c:730:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                           if (delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io(tsk))
                               ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io +730 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c

0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  676  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  677  /**
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  678   * cgroupstats_build - build and fill cgroupstats
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  679   * @stats: cgroupstats to fill information into
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  680   * @dentry: A dentry entry belonging to the cgroup for which stats have
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  681   * been requested.
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  682   *
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  683   * Build and fill cgroupstats so that taskstats can export it to user
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  684   * space.
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  685   */
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  686  int cgroupstats_build(struct cgroupstats *stats, struct dentry *dentry)
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  687  {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  688  	struct kernfs_node *kn = kernfs_node_from_dentry(dentry);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  689  	struct cgroup *cgrp;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  690  	struct css_task_iter it;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  691  	struct task_struct *tsk;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  692  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  693  	/* it should be kernfs_node belonging to cgroupfs and is a directory */
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  694  	if (dentry->d_sb->s_type != &cgroup_fs_type || !kn ||
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  695  	    kernfs_type(kn) != KERNFS_DIR)
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  696  		return -EINVAL;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  697  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  698  	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  699  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  700  	/*
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  701  	 * We aren't being called from kernfs and there's no guarantee on
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  702  	 * @kn->priv's validity.  For this and css_tryget_online_from_dir(),
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  703  	 * @kn->priv is RCU safe.  Let's do the RCU dancing.
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  704  	 */
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  705  	rcu_read_lock();
e0aed7c74f0bf6 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  706  	cgrp = rcu_dereference(*(void __rcu __force **)&kn->priv);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  707  	if (!cgrp || cgroup_is_dead(cgrp)) {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  708  		rcu_read_unlock();
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  709  		mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  710  		return -ENOENT;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  711  	}
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  712  	rcu_read_unlock();
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  713  
bc2fb7ed089ffd Tejun Heo 2017-05-15  714  	css_task_iter_start(&cgrp->self, 0, &it);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  715  	while ((tsk = css_task_iter_next(&it))) {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  716  		switch (tsk->state) {
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  717  		case TASK_RUNNING:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  718  			stats->nr_running++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  719  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  720  		case TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  721  			stats->nr_sleeping++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  722  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  723  		case TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  724  			stats->nr_uninterruptible++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  725  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  726  		case TASK_STOPPED:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  727  			stats->nr_stopped++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  728  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  729  		default:
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27 @730  			if (delayacct_is_task_waiting_on_io(tsk))
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  731  				stats->nr_io_wait++;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  732  			break;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  733  		}
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  734  	}
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  735  	css_task_iter_end(&it);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  736  
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  737  	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  738  	return 0;
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  739  }
0a268dbd7932c7 Tejun Heo 2016-12-27  740  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 36432 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation
  2021-04-13  1:37 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation brookxu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-14  1:24 ` kernel test robot
@ 2021-04-19  7:01 ` Balbir Singh
  2021-04-19  9:30   ` brookxu
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2021-04-19  7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brookxu; +Cc: adobriyan, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:37:26AM +0800, brookxu wrote:
> From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
> 
> The existing data structure is not very convenient for
> expansion, and part of the code can be saved. Here, try
> to optimize, which can make the code more concise and
> easy to expand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>

The approach seems to make sense, but the test robot has found
a few issues, can you correct those as applicable please?

Balbir Singh.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation
  2021-04-19  7:01 ` Balbir Singh
@ 2021-04-19  9:30   ` brookxu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: brookxu @ 2021-04-19  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Balbir Singh; +Cc: adobriyan, akpm, ebiederm, linux-kernel



Balbir Singh wrote on 2021/4/19 15:01:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:37:26AM +0800, brookxu wrote:
>> From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
>>
>> The existing data structure is not very convenient for
>> expansion, and part of the code can be saved. Here, try
>> to optimize, which can make the code more concise and
>> easy to expand.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
> 
> The approach seems to make sense, but the test robot has found
> a few issues, can you correct those as applicable please?

OK, i will fix it later, thanks for your reply.

> Balbir Singh.
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-19  9:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-13  1:37 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation brookxu
2021-04-13  1:37 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info brookxu
2021-04-13  6:14   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-13  6:14   ` [RFC PATCH] delayacct: delayacct_stats[] can be static kernel test robot
2021-04-13 21:26   ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] delayacct: Add a proc file to dump the delay info kernel test robot
2021-04-13 23:19 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] delayacct: refactor the code to simplify the implementation kernel test robot
2021-04-14  1:24 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-19  7:01 ` Balbir Singh
2021-04-19  9:30   ` brookxu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).