[PATCH net-next 1/5] misdn: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[PATCH net-next 1/5] misdn: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

gcc warns about a pointless condition:

drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c: In function 'hfcmulti_interrupt':
drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c:2752:17: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
 2752 |                 ; /* external IRQ */

Change this as suggested by gcc, which also fits the style of the
other conditions in this function.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
index 7013a3f08429..8ab0fde758d2 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
@@ -2748,8 +2748,9 @@ hfcmulti_interrupt(int intno, void *dev_id)
 		if (hc->ctype != HFC_TYPE_E1)
 			ph_state_irq(hc, r_irq_statech);
 	}
-	if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA)
-		; /* external IRQ */
+	if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA) {
+		/* external IRQ */
+	}
 	if (status & V_LOST_STA) {
 		/* LOST IRQ */
 		HFC_outb(hc, R_INC_RES_FIFO, V_RES_LOST); /* clear irq! */
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH net-next 2/5] dccp: avoid Wempty-body warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

There are a couple of warnings in this driver when building with W=1:

net/dccp/output.c: In function 'dccp_xmit_packet':
net/dccp/output.c:283:71: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
  283 |                 dccp_pr_debug("transmit_skb() returned err=%d\n", err);
      |                                                                       ^
net/dccp/ackvec.c: In function 'dccp_ackvec_update_old':
net/dccp/ackvec.c:163:80: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'else' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
  163 |                                               (unsigned long long)seqno, state);
      |                                                                                ^

Change the empty debug macros to no_printk(), which avoids the
warnings and adds useful format string checks.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 net/dccp/dccp.h  | 6 +++---
 net/dccp/proto.c | 2 --
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dccp/dccp.h b/net/dccp/dccp.h
index 9cc9d1ee6cdb..8a5163620bc3 100644
--- a/net/dccp/dccp.h
+++ b/net/dccp/dccp.h
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ extern bool dccp_debug;
 #define dccp_pr_debug_cat(format, a...)   DCCP_PRINTK(dccp_debug, format, ##a)
 #define dccp_debug(fmt, a...)		  dccp_pr_debug_cat(KERN_DEBUG fmt, ##a)
 #else
-#define dccp_pr_debug(format, a...)
-#define dccp_pr_debug_cat(format, a...)
-#define dccp_debug(format, a...)
+#define dccp_pr_debug(format, a...)	  no_printk(format, ##a)
+#define dccp_pr_debug_cat(format, a...)	  no_printk(format, ##a)
+#define dccp_debug(format, a...)	  no_printk(format, ##a)
 #endif
 
 extern struct inet_hashinfo dccp_hashinfo;
diff --git a/net/dccp/proto.c b/net/dccp/proto.c
index 6d705d90c614..97a175eaf247 100644
--- a/net/dccp/proto.c
+++ b/net/dccp/proto.c
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_hashinfo);
 /* the maximum queue length for tx in packets. 0 is no limit */
 int sysctl_dccp_tx_qlen __read_mostly = 5;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IP_DCCP_DEBUG
 static const char *dccp_state_name(const int state)
 {
 	static const char *const dccp_state_names[] = {
@@ -73,7 +72,6 @@ static const char *dccp_state_name(const int state)
 	else
 		return dccp_state_names[state];
 }
-#endif
 
 void dccp_set_state(struct sock *sk, const int state)
 {
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH net-next 3/5] iwlegacy: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

There are a couple of warnings in this driver when building with W=1:

drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c: In function 'il_power_set_mode':
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c:1195:60: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
 1195 |                                 il->chain_noise_data.state);
      |                                                            ^
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c: In function 'il_do_scan_abort':
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c:1343:57: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'else' statement [-Werror=empty-body]

Change the empty debug macros to no_printk(), which avoids the
warnings and adds useful format string checks.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c | 2 --
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c   | 2 --
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.h   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c
index 4ca8212d4fa4..6ff2674f8466 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c
@@ -751,9 +751,7 @@ il3945_hdl_alive(struct il_priv *il, struct il_rx_buf *rxb)
 static void
 il3945_hdl_add_sta(struct il_priv *il, struct il_rx_buf *rxb)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_IWLEGACY_DEBUG
 	struct il_rx_pkt *pkt = rxb_addr(rxb);
-#endif
 
 	D_RX("Received C_ADD_STA: 0x%02X\n", pkt->u.status);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
index 0651a6a416d1..219fed91cac5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
@@ -1430,10 +1430,8 @@ static void
 il_hdl_scan_complete(struct il_priv *il, struct il_rx_buf *rxb)
 {
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IWLEGACY_DEBUG
 	struct il_rx_pkt *pkt = rxb_addr(rxb);
 	struct il_scancomplete_notification *scan_notif = (void *)pkt->u.raw;
-#endif
 
 	D_SCAN("Scan complete: %d channels (TSF 0x%08X:%08X) - %d\n",
 	       scan_notif->scanned_channels, scan_notif->tsf_low,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.h b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.h
index ea1b1bb7ddcb..40877ef1fbf2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.h
@@ -2937,7 +2937,7 @@ do {									\
 } while (0)
 
 #else
-#define IL_DBG(level, fmt, args...)
+#define IL_DBG(level, fmt, args...) no_printk(fmt, ##args)
 static inline void
 il_print_hex_dump(struct il_priv *il, int level, const void *p, u32 len)
 {
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] iwlegacy: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Stanislaw Gruszka]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:43:33AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> There are a couple of warnings in this driver when building with W=1:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c: In function 'il_power_set_mode':
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c:1195:60: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>  1195 |                                 il->chain_noise_data.state);
>       |                                                            ^
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c: In function 'il_do_scan_abort':
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c:1343:57: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'else' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
> 
> Change the empty debug macros to no_printk(), which avoids the
> warnings and adds useful format string checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] iwlegacy: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Kalle Valo]

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> There are a couple of warnings in this driver when building with W=1:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c: In function 'il_power_set_mode':
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c:1195:60: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>  1195 |                                 il->chain_noise_data.state);
>       |                                                            ^
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c: In function 'il_do_scan_abort':
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c:1343:57: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'else' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
> 
> Change the empty debug macros to no_printk(), which avoids the
> warnings and adds useful format string checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

fa9f5d0e0b45 iwlegacy: avoid -Wempty-body warning

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210322104343.948660-3-arnd@kernel.org/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

[PATCH net-next 4/5] libertas: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Building without mesh supports shows a couple of warnings with
'make W=1':

drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/main.c: In function 'lbs_start_card':
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/main.c:1068:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
 1068 |                 lbs_start_mesh(priv);

Change the macros to use the usual "do { } while (0)" instead to shut up
the warnings and make the code a litte more robust.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/mesh.h | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/mesh.h b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/mesh.h
index d49717b20c09..44c4cd0230a8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/mesh.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/mesh.h
@@ -60,13 +60,13 @@ void lbs_mesh_ethtool_get_strings(struct net_device *dev,
 
 #else
 
-#define lbs_init_mesh(priv)
-#define lbs_deinit_mesh(priv)
-#define lbs_start_mesh(priv)
-#define lbs_add_mesh(priv)
-#define lbs_remove_mesh(priv)
+#define lbs_init_mesh(priv)	do { } while (0)
+#define lbs_deinit_mesh(priv)	do { } while (0)
+#define lbs_start_mesh(priv)	do { } while (0)
+#define lbs_add_mesh(priv)	do { } while (0)
+#define lbs_remove_mesh(priv)	do { } while (0)
 #define lbs_mesh_set_dev(priv, dev, rxpd) (dev)
-#define lbs_mesh_set_txpd(priv, dev, txpd)
+#define lbs_mesh_set_txpd(priv, dev, txpd) do { } while (0)
 #define lbs_mesh_set_channel(priv, channel) (0)
 #define lbs_mesh_activated(priv) (false)
 
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] libertas: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Kalle Valo]

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Building without mesh supports shows a couple of warnings with
> 'make W=1':
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/main.c: In function 'lbs_start_card':
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/main.c:1068:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>  1068 |                 lbs_start_mesh(priv);
> 
> Change the macros to use the usual "do { } while (0)" instead to shut up
> the warnings and make the code a litte more robust.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

01414f8882f9 libertas: avoid -Wempty-body warning

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210322104343.948660-4-arnd@kernel.org/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

[PATCH net-next 5/5] vxge: avoid -Wemtpy-body warnings

[Arnd Bergmann]

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

There are a few warnings about empty debug macros in this driver:

drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c: In function 'vxge_probe':
drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c:4480:76: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
 4480 |                                 "Failed in enabling SRIOV mode: %d\n", ret);

Change them to proper 'do { } while (0)' expressions to make the
code a little more robust and avoid the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.h | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.h
index 9c86f4f9cd42..55673fdebe3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.h
@@ -454,49 +454,49 @@ int vxge_fw_upgrade(struct vxgedev *vdev, char *fw_name, int override);
 #define vxge_debug_ll_config(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_LL_CONFIG, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_ll_config(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_ll_config(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #if (VXGE_DEBUG_INIT & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK)
 #define vxge_debug_init(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_INIT, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_init(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_init(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #if (VXGE_DEBUG_TX & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK)
 #define vxge_debug_tx(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_TX, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_tx(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_tx(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #if (VXGE_DEBUG_RX & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK)
 #define vxge_debug_rx(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_RX, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_rx(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_rx(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #if (VXGE_DEBUG_MEM & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK)
 #define vxge_debug_mem(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_MEM, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_mem(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_mem(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #if (VXGE_DEBUG_ENTRYEXIT & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK)
 #define vxge_debug_entryexit(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_ENTRYEXIT, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_entryexit(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_entryexit(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #if (VXGE_DEBUG_INTR & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK)
 #define vxge_debug_intr(level, fmt, ...) \
 	vxge_debug_ll(level, VXGE_DEBUG_INTR, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-#define vxge_debug_intr(level, fmt, ...)
+#define vxge_debug_intr(level, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt)
 #endif
 
 #define VXGE_DEVICE_DEBUG_LEVEL_SET(level, mask, vdev) {\
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] vxge: avoid -Wemtpy-body warnings

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:43 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> There are a few warnings about empty debug macros in this driver:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c: In function 'vxge_probe':
> drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c:4480:76: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>  4480 |                                 "Failed in enabling SRIOV mode: %d\n", ret);
>
> Change them to proper 'do { } while (0)' expressions to make the
> code a little more robust and avoid the warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Please disregard this patch, I was accidentally building without -Wformat and
failed to notice that this introduces a regression. I'll send a new
version after
more testing.

       Arnd

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] misdn: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:43:31AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> gcc warns about a pointless condition:
> 
> drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c: In function 'hfcmulti_interrupt':
> drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c:2752:17: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
>  2752 |                 ; /* external IRQ */
> 
> Change this as suggested by gcc, which also fits the style of the
> other conditions in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> index 7013a3f08429..8ab0fde758d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> +++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> @@ -2748,8 +2748,9 @@ hfcmulti_interrupt(int intno, void *dev_id)
>  		if (hc->ctype != HFC_TYPE_E1)
>  			ph_state_irq(hc, r_irq_statech);
>  	}
> -	if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA)
> -		; /* external IRQ */
> +	if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA) {
> +		/* external IRQ */
> +	}

Any reason do not delete this hunk?

>  	if (status & V_LOST_STA) {
>  		/* LOST IRQ */
>  		HFC_outb(hc, R_INC_RES_FIFO, V_RES_LOST); /* clear irq! */
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] misdn: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:55 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:43:31AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > gcc warns about a pointless condition:
> >
> > drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c: In function 'hfcmulti_interrupt':
> > drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c:2752:17: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
> >  2752 |                 ; /* external IRQ */
> >
> > Change this as suggested by gcc, which also fits the style of the
> > other conditions in this function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> > index 7013a3f08429..8ab0fde758d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> > +++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> > @@ -2748,8 +2748,9 @@ hfcmulti_interrupt(int intno, void *dev_id)
> >               if (hc->ctype != HFC_TYPE_E1)
> >                       ph_state_irq(hc, r_irq_statech);
> >       }
> > -     if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA)
> > -             ; /* external IRQ */
> > +     if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA) {
> > +             /* external IRQ */
> > +     }
>
> Any reason do not delete this hunk?

I don't care either way, I only kept it because it was apparently left there
on purpose by the original author, as seen by the comment.

        Arnd

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] misdn: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:24:20PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:55 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:43:31AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > >
> > > gcc warns about a pointless condition:
> > >
> > > drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c: In function 'hfcmulti_interrupt':
> > > drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c:2752:17: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
> > >  2752 |                 ; /* external IRQ */
> > >
> > > Change this as suggested by gcc, which also fits the style of the
> > > other conditions in this function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> > > index 7013a3f08429..8ab0fde758d2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcmulti.c
> > > @@ -2748,8 +2748,9 @@ hfcmulti_interrupt(int intno, void *dev_id)
> > >               if (hc->ctype != HFC_TYPE_E1)
> > >                       ph_state_irq(hc, r_irq_statech);
> > >       }
> > > -     if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA)
> > > -             ; /* external IRQ */
> > > +     if (status & V_EXT_IRQSTA) {
> > > +             /* external IRQ */
> > > +     }
> >
> > Any reason do not delete this hunk?
> 
> I don't care either way, I only kept it because it was apparently left there
> on purpose by the original author, as seen by the comment.

I personally would delete it.

Thanks

> 
>         Arnd

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] misdn: avoid -Wempty-body warning

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:08 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:24:20PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:55 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't care either way, I only kept it because it was apparently left there
> > on purpose by the original author, as seen by the comment.
>
> I personally would delete it.

Ok, I sent a second version now, I hope one of them can get applied.

        Arnd