* [PATCH memory-model] Fix smp_mb__after_spinlock() spelling
@ 2021-05-11 23:26 Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2021-05-11 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arch, kernel-team, mingo
Cc: stern, parri.andrea, will, peterz, boqun.feng, npiggin, dhowells,
j.alglave, luc.maranget, akiyks
A misspelled git-grep regex revealed that smp_mb__after_spinlock()
was misspelled in explanation.txt. This commit adds the missing "_".
Fixes: 1c27b644c0fd ("Automate memory-barriers.txt; provide Linux-kernel memory model")
[ paulmck: Apply Alan Stern commit-log feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
index f9d610d5a1a4..5d72f3112e56 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt
@@ -2510,7 +2510,7 @@ they behave as follows:
smp_mb__after_atomic() orders po-earlier atomic updates and
the events preceding them against all po-later events;
- smp_mb_after_spinlock() orders po-earlier lock acquisition
+ smp_mb__after_spinlock() orders po-earlier lock acquisition
events and the events preceding them against all po-later
events.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-05-11 23:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-11 23:26 [PATCH memory-model] Fix smp_mb__after_spinlock() spelling Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).