linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, rric@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, wsa@kernel.org, Sanket.Goswami@amd.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/4] PCI: Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors()
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 23:39:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607153916.1021016-2-zhengdejin5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607153916.1021016-1-zhengdejin5@gmail.com>

Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(), a device-managed version of
pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). Introducing this function can simplify
the error handling path in many drivers.

And use pci_free_irq_vectors() to replace some code in pcim_release(),
they are equivalent, and no functional change. It is more explicit
that pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() is a device-managed function.

When CONFIG_PCI=n, there is no stub for pci_is_managed(), but
pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() will use it, so add one like other similar stubs.
Otherwise there can be build errors, as here by kernel test robot
reported:
include/linux/pci.h: In function 'pcim_alloc_irq_vectors':
>> include/linux/pci.h:1847:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_is_managed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    1847 |  if (!pci_is_managed(dev))
         |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>
---
v6 -> v7:
	- rebase to PCI next branch
	- add a stub for pci_is_managed() when disable PCI for
	  fix build error in sparc architecture.
v5 -> v6:
	- rebase to 5.13-rc4
v4 -> v5:
	- Remove the check of enable device in pcim_alloc_irq_vectors()
	  and make it as a static line function.
v3 -> v4:
	- No change
v2 -> v3:
	- Add some commit comments for replace some codes in
	  pcim_release() by pci_free_irq_vectors().
v1 -> v2:
	- Use pci_free_irq_vectors() to replace some code in
	  pcim_release().
	- Modify some commit messages.

 drivers/pci/pci.c   |  5 +----
 include/linux/pci.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 452351025a09..e3b3fc59bd35 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1989,10 +1989,7 @@ static void pcim_release(struct device *gendev, void *res)
 	struct pci_devres *this = res;
 	int i;
 
-	if (dev->msi_enabled)
-		pci_disable_msi(dev);
-	if (dev->msix_enabled)
-		pci_disable_msix(dev);
+	pci_free_irq_vectors(dev);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++)
 		if (this->region_mask & (1 << i))
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index c20211e59a57..5783262c4643 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1730,6 +1730,7 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_class(unsigned int class,
 
 static inline void pci_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
 static inline int pci_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev) { return -EIO; }
+static inline int pci_is_managed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return 0; }
 static inline void pci_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
 static inline int pcim_enable_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return -EIO; }
 static inline int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i)
@@ -1825,6 +1826,30 @@ pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
 					      NULL);
 }
 
+/**
+ * pcim_alloc_irq_vectors - a device-managed pci_alloc_irq_vectors()
+ * @dev:		PCI device to operate on
+ * @min_vecs:		minimum number of vectors required (must be >= 1)
+ * @max_vecs:		maximum (desired) number of vectors
+ * @flags:		flags or quirks for the allocation
+ *
+ * Return the number of vectors allocated, (which might be smaller than
+ * @max_vecs) if successful, or a negative error code on error. If less
+ * than @min_vecs interrupt vectors are available for @dev the function
+ * will fail with -ENOSPC.
+ *
+ * It depends on calling pcim_enable_device() to make IRQ resources
+ * manageable.
+ */
+static inline int
+pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
+			unsigned int max_vecs, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	if (!pci_is_managed(dev))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	return pci_alloc_irq_vectors(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, flags);
+}
+
 /* Include architecture-dependent settings and functions */
 
 #include <asm/pci.h>
-- 
2.30.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-07 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 15:39 [PATCH v7 0/4] Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() Dejin Zheng
2021-06-07 15:39 ` Dejin Zheng [this message]
2021-06-07 16:12   ` [PATCH v7 1/4] PCI: " Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 17:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-08 14:23       ` Dejin Zheng
2021-06-08 14:20     ` Dejin Zheng
2021-06-10 22:41   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-11  9:37     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-16 19:25       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-17 13:20         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-17 15:58           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-12-16  8:34             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-17 17:17           ` Dejin Zheng
2022-02-24 11:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-07 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] Documentation: devres: Add pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() Dejin Zheng
2021-06-07 16:13   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] i2c: designware: Use pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() to allocate IRQ vectors Dejin Zheng
2021-11-29 19:15   ` Wolfram Sang
2021-06-07 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] i2c: thunderx: " Dejin Zheng
2021-11-29 19:16   ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210607153916.1021016-2-zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
    --to=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
    --cc=Sanket.Goswami@amd.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).