From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com,
anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com,
Vasyl Vavrychuk <Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com>,
Andriy Tryshnivskyy <Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/12] firmware: arm_scmi, smccc, mailbox: Make shmem based transports optional
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:54:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210621085431.whk5z3gohk3pb6j7@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABb+yY2q8Vw90=qEiNSOUZ39ZmX0ECShTvSidLoYCuZ-xGy-Mg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:09:21PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:22 PM Peter Hilber
> <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com> wrote:
>
> .....
>
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > menuconfig MAILBOX
> > bool "Mailbox Hardware Support"
> > + select ARM_SCMI_HAVE_SHMEM
> > help
> > Mailbox is a framework to control hardware communication between
> > on-chip processors through queued messages and interrupt driven
> >
> Isn't this too generic?
> Not all platforms, with a mailbox controller, use SCMI as the protocol.
>
Yikes! I agree Jassi, this looks super hack.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 0:20 [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add virtio transport Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/12] firmware: arm_scmi, smccc, mailbox: Make shmem based transports optional Peter Hilber
2021-06-21 4:09 ` Jassi Brar
2021-06-21 8:54 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2021-06-21 9:01 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add transport init/deinit Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add op to override max message # Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add optional link_supplier() transport op Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add per-device transport private info Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add is_scmi_protocol_device() Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add msg_handle to some transport ops Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add optional drop_message() transport op Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add message passing abstractions for transports Peter Hilber
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/12] dt-bindings: arm: Add virtio transport for SCMI Peter Hilber
2021-05-17 21:39 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add virtio transport Peter Hilber
2021-05-18 8:08 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-05-26 14:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-06-04 9:19 ` Peter Hilber
2021-06-04 11:56 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-06-01 14:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-06-02 8:25 ` Peter Hilber
2021-06-02 8:33 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-06-02 8:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Handle races between core and transport Peter Hilber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210621085431.whk5z3gohk3pb6j7@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com \
--cc=Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com \
--cc=peter.hilber@opensynergy.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).