From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"parav@mellanox.com" <parav@mellanox.com>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shenming Lu <lushenming@huawei.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] /dev/iommu uAPI proposal
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:26:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210713102607.3a886fee.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713125503.GC136586@nvidia.com>
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:55:03 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:56:24PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
> > Maybe I misunderstood your question. Are you specifically worried
> > about establishing the security context for a mdev vs. for its
> > parent?
>
> The way to think about the cookie, and the device bind/attach in
> general, is as taking control of a portion of the IOMMU routing:
>
> - RID
> - RID + PASID
> - "software"
>
> For the first two there can be only one device attachment per value so
> the cookie is unambiguous.
>
> For "software" the iommu layer has little to do with this - everything
> is constructed outside by the mdev. If the mdev wishes to communicate
> on /dev/iommu using the cookie then it has to do so using some iommufd
> api and we can convay the proper device at that point.
>
> Kevin didn't show it, but along side the PCI attaches:
>
> struct iommu_attach_data * iommu_pci_device_attach(
> struct iommu_dev *dev, struct pci_device *pdev,
> u32 ioasid);
>
> There would also be a software attach for mdev:
>
> struct iommu_attach_data * iommu_sw_device_attach(
> struct iommu_dev *dev, struct device *pdev, u32 ioasid);
>
> Which does not connect anything to the iommu layer.
>
> It would have to return something that allows querying the IO page
> table, and the mdev would use that API instead of vfio_pin_pages().
Quoting this proposal again:
> 1) A successful binding call for the first device in the group creates
> the security context for the entire group, by:
>
> * Verifying group viability in a similar way as VFIO does;
>
> * Calling IOMMU-API to move the group into a block-dma state,
> which makes all devices in the group attached to an block-dma
> domain with an empty I/O page table;
>
> VFIO should not allow the user to mmap the MMIO bar of the bound
> device until the binding call succeeds.
The attach step is irrelevant to my question, the bind step is where
the device/group gets into a secure state for device access.
So for IGD we have two scenarios, direct assignment and software mdevs.
AIUI the operation of VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMU_FD looks like this:
iommu_ctx = iommu_ctx_fdget(iommu_fd);
mdev = mdev_from_dev(vdev->dev);
dev = mdev ? mdev_parent_dev(mdev) : vdev->dev;
iommu_dev = iommu_register_device(iommu_ctx, dev, cookie);
In either case, this last line is either registering the IGD itself
(ie. the struct device representing PCI device 0000:00:02.0) or the
parent of the GVT-g mdev (ie. the struct device representing PCI device
0000:00:02.0). They're the same! AIUI, the cookie is simply an
arbitrary user generated value which they'll use to refer to this
device via the iommu_fd uAPI.
So what magic is iommu_register_device() doing to infer my intentions
as to whether I'm asking for the IGD RID to be isolated or I'm only
creating a software context for an mdev? Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 7:48 [RFC v2] /dev/iommu uAPI proposal Tian, Kevin
2021-07-09 21:50 ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-12 1:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-12 18:41 ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-12 23:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-12 23:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-13 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-13 16:26 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2021-07-13 16:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-13 22:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-13 23:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-13 23:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-13 23:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-13 23:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-15 3:20 ` Shenming Lu
2021-07-15 3:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-15 6:29 ` Shenming Lu
2021-07-15 6:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-15 8:14 ` Shenming Lu
2021-07-15 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 13:57 ` Raj, Ashok
2021-07-15 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 16:21 ` Raj, Ashok
2021-07-15 17:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 17:48 ` Raj, Ashok
2021-07-15 17:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 18:05 ` Raj, Ashok
2021-07-15 18:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-16 1:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-16 12:20 ` Shenming Lu
2021-07-21 2:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-22 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-16 18:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-21 2:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-26 4:50 ` David Gibson
2021-07-28 4:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-03 1:50 ` David Gibson
2021-08-03 3:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-06 4:45 ` David Gibson
2021-08-06 12:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-10 6:10 ` David Gibson
2021-08-09 8:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-10 4:47 ` David Gibson
2021-08-10 6:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-07-30 14:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-02 2:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-04 14:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-04 22:59 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-05 11:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 22:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-06 4:47 ` David Gibson
2021-08-03 1:58 ` David Gibson
2021-08-04 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-06 4:24 ` David Gibson
2021-07-26 8:14 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-07-28 4:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-04 15:59 ` Eric Auger
2021-08-05 0:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-10 7:17 ` Eric Auger
2021-08-10 9:00 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210713102607.3a886fee.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=lushenming@huawei.com \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).