* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review
2021-08-16 17:14 [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2021-08-16 21:53 ` Shuah Khan
2021-08-17 7:07 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2021-08-16 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 8/16/21 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.142 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:13:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.142-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review
2021-08-16 17:14 [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-16 21:53 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2021-08-17 7:07 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-08-17 11:48 ` Samuel Zou
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-08-17 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Guenter Roeck,
Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, Pavel Machek, Jon Hunter,
Florian Fainelli, linux-stable
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 22:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.142 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:13:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.142-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.142-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 24a339d553e6ee1ba2c6216df053c7cce1e3db4c
* git describe: v5.4.141-65-g24a339d553e6
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.141-65-g24a339d553e6
## No regressions (compared to v5.4.141-63-g13046907c978)
## No fixes (compared to v5.4.141-63-g13046907c978)
## Test result summary
total: 84832, pass: 69927, fail: 655, skip: 12851, xfail: 1399
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review
2021-08-16 17:14 [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-16 21:53 ` Shuah Khan
2021-08-17 7:07 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-08-17 11:48 ` Samuel Zou
2021-08-17 14:22 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2021-08-17 19:28 ` Guenter Roeck
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Zou @ 2021-08-17 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On 2021/8/17 1:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.142 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:13:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.142-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.4.142-rc2,
Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.4.y
Version: 5.4.142-rc2
Commit: 24a339d553e6ee1ba2c6216df053c7cce1e3db4c
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8906
passed: 8906
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 8906
passed: 8906
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review
2021-08-16 17:14 [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-17 11:48 ` Samuel Zou
@ 2021-08-17 14:22 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2021-08-17 19:28 ` Guenter Roeck
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2021-08-17 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.142 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:13:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 65 configs -> 1 failed
decstation_r4k_defconfig build failed due to new binutils. Reported at:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YRujeISiIjKF5eAi@debian/
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/37
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review
2021-08-16 17:14 [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.142-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-17 14:22 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2021-08-17 19:28 ` Guenter Roeck
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-08-17 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.142 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:13:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 444 pass: 444 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread