From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Maciej Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
David S Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, notify@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce the pkill_on_warn boot parameter
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:06:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202109291229.C64A1D9D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <323d0784-249d-7fef-6c60-e8426d35b083@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:03:36PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/29/21 11:58 AM, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/panic.c
> > +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static int pause_on_oops_flag;
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pause_on_oops_lock);
> > bool crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
> > int panic_on_warn __read_mostly;
> > +int pkill_on_warn __read_mostly;
I like this idea. I can't tell if Linus would tolerate it, though. But I
really have wanted a middle ground like BUG(). Having only WARN() and
panic() is not very friendly. :(
> > unsigned long panic_on_taint;
> > bool panic_on_taint_nousertaint = false;
> >
> > @@ -610,6 +611,9 @@ void __warn(const char *file, int line, void *caller, unsigned taint,
> >
> > print_oops_end_marker();
> >
> > + if (pkill_on_warn && system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> > + do_group_exit(SIGKILL);
> > +
> > /* Just a warning, don't kill lockdep. */
> > add_taint(taint, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> > }
>
> Doesn't this tie into the warning *printing* code? That's better than
> nothing, for sure. But, if we're doing this for hardening, I think we
> would want to kill anyone provoking a warning, not just the first one
> that triggered *printing* the warning.
Right, this needs to be moved into the callers of __warn() (i.e.
report_bug(), and warn_slowpath_fmt()), likely with some small
refactoring in report_bug().
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 18:58 [PATCH] Introduce the pkill_on_warn boot parameter Alexander Popov
2021-09-29 19:01 ` Alexander Popov
2021-09-29 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-30 9:15 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-30 15:05 ` Alexander Popov
2021-10-01 12:23 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-30 16:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-01 12:09 ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-30 18:28 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-01 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-02 11:41 ` Alexander Popov
2021-10-02 12:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-02 16:33 ` Alexander Popov
2021-10-02 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-02 21:05 ` Alexander Popov
2021-10-05 19:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-06 14:56 ` Alexander Popov
2021-10-22 17:30 ` Alexander Popov
2022-07-27 16:17 ` Alexey Khoroshilov
2022-07-27 16:30 ` Jann Horn
2022-07-27 16:43 ` Alexey Khoroshilov
2022-07-27 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-07-27 17:47 ` Alexey Khoroshilov
2021-09-29 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2021-09-30 18:27 ` Alexander Popov
2021-09-30 18:36 ` Kees Cook
2021-09-29 19:03 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-29 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-29 20:06 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-09-30 13:55 ` Alexander Popov
2021-09-30 18:20 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-02 18:04 ` Al Viro
2021-10-02 18:31 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202109291229.C64A1D9D@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=notify@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).