From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
enric.balletbo@collabora.com, dafna3@gmail.com,
Mason Zhang <Mason.Zhang@mediatek.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: modify set_cs_timing parameter"
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:46:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210930124630.GY4199@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28f8af42-4535-ef9f-e521-712d37e2cb72@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2119 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:36:01PM +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> hi, thanks for the fast feedback
>
> On 30.09.21 14:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:07:00PM +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 04e6bb0d6bb127bac929fb35edd2dd01613c9520.
> > Which is not what the commit message nor the paste of the full hash
> > claimed :/
> What is the paste of the full hash?
The above.
> Since the second commit is only a warning fixes I thought it is cumbersome to
> send two separate reverting patches. Should I?
No, you should write a proper commit log with (like I said) a normal
subject line - basically, follow the process in submitting-patches.rst.
> > Do we have any analysis as to why? Do these devices use timing
> > parameters in some way for example, or do the values written out to the
> > device change in some way?
> > You've provided no analysis here so it's hard to tell if this is just
> > some random change that happens to change code generation slighly or if
> > there's some actual reason why this might fix something. I'll note that
> > as far as I can see there are no users of this API upstream so I'm
> > guessing that you've got some out of tree consumer driver which uses the
> > API, it's possible that there was some error in updating that driver to
> > the new interface which is causing the issue.
> Actually the original commit not only change that callback 'set_cs_timing' but it also
> calls 'mtk_spi_set_hw_cs_timing' directly from the function "mtk_spi_prepare_message".
> So this actually influences all devices bound to this driver (in upstream)
> I did some printing and it does change values that are written to registers.
OK, so that's something that should have been in the commit log,
preferrably in a more detailed form that identifies what the change is.
However changing the values written out is clearly not the intent of the
patch and it is a substantially better API so can we not just fix things
so that the old values are written out? Why are we jumping straight to
a revert here?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 12:07 [PATCH] Revert "spi: modify set_cs_timing parameter" Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 12:36 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 12:46 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-30 13:06 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 13:42 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210930124630.GY4199@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=Mason.Zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com \
--cc=dafna3@gmail.com \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).