[PATCH] ASoC: soc-component: Remove conditional definition of debugfs data members

[PATCH] ASoC: soc-component: Remove conditional definition of debugfs data members

[Simon Trimmer]

This simplification allows the use of the standard kernel pattern of
static inline dummy functions for debugfs code. Most systems will only
have a small number of snd_soc_components so the memory impact is
minimal.

Signed-off-by: Simon Trimmer <simont@opensource.cirrus.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 include/sound/soc-component.h | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-component.h b/include/sound/soc-component.h
index e09a2d108e8c..3a35d149e92f 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-component.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-component.h
@@ -227,10 +227,8 @@ struct snd_soc_component {
 	struct snd_compr_stream  *mark_compr_open;
 	void *mark_pm;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	struct dentry *debugfs_root;
 	const char *debugfs_prefix;
-#endif
 };
 
 #define for_each_component_dais(component, dai)\
-- 
2.33.0

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-component: Remove conditional definition of debugfs data members

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:21:16 +0100, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> This simplification allows the use of the standard kernel pattern of
> static inline dummy functions for debugfs code. Most systems will only
> have a small number of snd_soc_components so the memory impact is
> minimal.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: soc-component: Remove conditional definition of debugfs data members
      commit: 0a43c152ed0666dc837009bae031b898ced95e5b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark