From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 19/25] x86/qspinlock, kcsan: Instrument barrier of pv_queued_spin_unlock()
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:44:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211130114433.2580590-20-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211130114433.2580590-1-elver@google.com>
If CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS=y, queued_spin_unlock() is implemented
using pv_queued_spin_unlock() which is entirely inline asm based. As
such, we do not receive any KCSAN barrier instrumentation via regular
atomic operations.
Add the missing KCSAN barrier instrumentation for the
CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS case.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index d86ab942219c..d87451df480b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static inline void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
+ kcsan_release();
pv_queued_spin_unlock(lock);
}
--
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-30 11:44 [PATCH v3 00/25] kcsan: Support detecting a subset of missing memory barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/25] kcsan: Refactor reading of instrumented memory Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/25] kcsan: Remove redundant zero-initialization of globals Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/25] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/25] kcsan: Add core support for a subset of weak memory modeling Marco Elver
2021-12-03 8:56 ` Marco Elver
2021-12-03 16:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-03 21:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-03 23:42 ` Marco Elver
2021-12-03 23:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-03 23:45 ` Marco Elver
2021-12-04 1:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/25] kcsan: Add core memory barrier instrumentation functions Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/25] kcsan, kbuild: Add option for barrier instrumentation only Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/25] kcsan: Call scoped accesses reordered in reports Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/25] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to Marco Elver
2021-12-06 5:03 ` Boqun Feng
2021-12-06 7:16 ` Marco Elver
2021-12-06 14:31 ` Boqun Feng
2021-12-06 16:04 ` Marco Elver
2021-12-06 17:16 ` Boqun Feng
2021-12-06 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/25] kcsan: Document modeling of weak memory Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/25] kcsan: test: Match reordered or normal accesses Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/25] kcsan: test: Add test cases for memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/25] kcsan: Ignore GCC 11+ warnings about TSan runtime support Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/25] kcsan: selftest: Add test case to check memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/25] locking/barriers, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 15/25] locking/barriers, kcsan: Support generic instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/25] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 17/25] asm-generic/bitops, " Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 18/25] x86/barriers, kcsan: Use generic instrumentation for non-smp barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 20/25] mm, kcsan: Enable barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 21/25] sched, kcsan: Enable memory " Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 22/25] objtool, kcsan: Add memory barrier instrumentation to whitelist Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 23/25] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 24/25] compiler_attributes.h: Add __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 25/25] kcsan: Support WEAK_MEMORY with Clang where no objtool support exists Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211130114433.2580590-20-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).