linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/25] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 13:03:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya2Zpf8qpgDYiGqM@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211130114433.2580590-9-elver@google.com>

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:44:16PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> Also show the location the access was reordered to. An example report:
> 
> | ==================================================================
> | BUG: KCSAN: data-race in test_kernel_wrong_memorder / test_kernel_wrong_memorder
> |
> | read-write to 0xffffffffc01e61a8 of 8 bytes by task 2311 on cpu 5:
> |  test_kernel_wrong_memorder+0x57/0x90
> |  access_thread+0x99/0xe0
> |  kthread+0x2ba/0x2f0
> |  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> |
> | read-write (reordered) to 0xffffffffc01e61a8 of 8 bytes by task 2310 on cpu 7:
> |  test_kernel_wrong_memorder+0x57/0x90
> |  access_thread+0x99/0xe0
> |  kthread+0x2ba/0x2f0
> |  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> |   |
> |   +-> reordered to: test_kernel_wrong_memorder+0x80/0x90
> |

Should this be "reordered from" instead of "reordered to"? For example,
if the following case needs a smp_mb() between write to A and write to
B, I think currently it will report as follow:

	foo() {
		WRITE_ONCE(A, 1); // let's say A's address is 0xaaaa
		bar() {
			WRITE_ONCE(B, 1); // Assume B's address is 0xbbbb
					  // KCSAN find the problem here
		}
	}

	<report>
	| write (reordered) to 0xaaaa of ...:
	| bar+0x... // address of the write to B
	| foo+0x... // address of the callsite to bar()
	| ...
	|  |
	|  +-> reordered to: foo+0x... // address of the write to A

But since the access reported here is the write to A, so it's a
"reordered from" instead of "reordered to"?

Regards,
Boqun

> | Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
> | CPU: 7 PID: 2310 Comm: access_thread Not tainted 5.14.0-rc1+ #18
> | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
> | ==================================================================
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
>  kernel/kcsan/report.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/report.c b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> index 1b0e050bdf6a..67794404042a 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> @@ -308,10 +308,12 @@ static int get_stack_skipnr(const unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries
>  
>  /*
>   * Skips to the first entry that matches the function of @ip, and then replaces
> - * that entry with @ip, returning the entries to skip.
> + * that entry with @ip, returning the entries to skip with @replaced containing
> + * the replaced entry.
>   */
>  static int
> -replace_stack_entry(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned long ip)
> +replace_stack_entry(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned long ip,
> +		    unsigned long *replaced)
>  {
>  	unsigned long symbolsize, offset;
>  	unsigned long target_func;
> @@ -330,6 +332,7 @@ replace_stack_entry(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned lon
>  		func -= offset;
>  
>  		if (func == target_func) {
> +			*replaced = stack_entries[skip];
>  			stack_entries[skip] = ip;
>  			return skip;
>  		}
> @@ -342,9 +345,10 @@ replace_stack_entry(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned lon
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -sanitize_stack_entries(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned long ip)
> +sanitize_stack_entries(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned long ip,
> +		       unsigned long *replaced)
>  {
> -	return ip ? replace_stack_entry(stack_entries, num_entries, ip) :
> +	return ip ? replace_stack_entry(stack_entries, num_entries, ip, replaced) :
>  			  get_stack_skipnr(stack_entries, num_entries);
>  }
>  
> @@ -360,6 +364,14 @@ static int sym_strcmp(void *addr1, void *addr2)
>  	return strncmp(buf1, buf2, sizeof(buf1));
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +print_stack_trace(unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries, unsigned long reordered_to)
> +{
> +	stack_trace_print(stack_entries, num_entries, 0);
> +	if (reordered_to)
> +		pr_err("  |\n  +-> reordered to: %pS\n", (void *)reordered_to);
> +}
> +
>  static void print_verbose_info(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>  	if (!task)
> @@ -378,10 +390,12 @@ static void print_report(enum kcsan_value_change value_change,
>  			 struct other_info *other_info,
>  			 u64 old, u64 new, u64 mask)
>  {
> +	unsigned long reordered_to = 0;
>  	unsigned long stack_entries[NUM_STACK_ENTRIES] = { 0 };
>  	int num_stack_entries = stack_trace_save(stack_entries, NUM_STACK_ENTRIES, 1);
> -	int skipnr = sanitize_stack_entries(stack_entries, num_stack_entries, ai->ip);
> +	int skipnr = sanitize_stack_entries(stack_entries, num_stack_entries, ai->ip, &reordered_to);
>  	unsigned long this_frame = stack_entries[skipnr];
> +	unsigned long other_reordered_to = 0;
>  	unsigned long other_frame = 0;
>  	int other_skipnr = 0; /* silence uninit warnings */
>  
> @@ -394,7 +408,7 @@ static void print_report(enum kcsan_value_change value_change,
>  	if (other_info) {
>  		other_skipnr = sanitize_stack_entries(other_info->stack_entries,
>  						      other_info->num_stack_entries,
> -						      other_info->ai.ip);
> +						      other_info->ai.ip, &other_reordered_to);
>  		other_frame = other_info->stack_entries[other_skipnr];
>  
>  		/* @value_change is only known for the other thread */
> @@ -434,10 +448,9 @@ static void print_report(enum kcsan_value_change value_change,
>  		       other_info->ai.cpu_id);
>  
>  		/* Print the other thread's stack trace. */
> -		stack_trace_print(other_info->stack_entries + other_skipnr,
> +		print_stack_trace(other_info->stack_entries + other_skipnr,
>  				  other_info->num_stack_entries - other_skipnr,
> -				  0);
> -
> +				  other_reordered_to);
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCSAN_VERBOSE))
>  			print_verbose_info(other_info->task);
>  
> @@ -451,9 +464,7 @@ static void print_report(enum kcsan_value_change value_change,
>  		       get_thread_desc(ai->task_pid), ai->cpu_id);
>  	}
>  	/* Print stack trace of this thread. */
> -	stack_trace_print(stack_entries + skipnr, num_stack_entries - skipnr,
> -			  0);
> -
> +	print_stack_trace(stack_entries + skipnr, num_stack_entries - skipnr, reordered_to);
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCSAN_VERBOSE))
>  		print_verbose_info(current);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-06  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-30 11:44 [PATCH v3 00/25] kcsan: Support detecting a subset of missing memory barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/25] kcsan: Refactor reading of instrumented memory Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/25] kcsan: Remove redundant zero-initialization of globals Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/25] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/25] kcsan: Add core support for a subset of weak memory modeling Marco Elver
2021-12-03  8:56   ` Marco Elver
2021-12-03 16:50     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-03 21:08       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-03 23:42         ` Marco Elver
2021-12-03 23:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-03 23:45           ` Marco Elver
2021-12-04  1:14             ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/25] kcsan: Add core memory barrier instrumentation functions Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/25] kcsan, kbuild: Add option for barrier instrumentation only Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/25] kcsan: Call scoped accesses reordered in reports Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/25] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to Marco Elver
2021-12-06  5:03   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2021-12-06  7:16     ` Marco Elver
2021-12-06 14:31       ` Boqun Feng
2021-12-06 16:04         ` Marco Elver
2021-12-06 17:16           ` Boqun Feng
2021-12-06 17:38             ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/25] kcsan: Document modeling of weak memory Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/25] kcsan: test: Match reordered or normal accesses Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/25] kcsan: test: Add test cases for memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/25] kcsan: Ignore GCC 11+ warnings about TSan runtime support Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/25] kcsan: selftest: Add test case to check memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/25] locking/barriers, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 15/25] locking/barriers, kcsan: Support generic instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/25] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 17/25] asm-generic/bitops, " Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 18/25] x86/barriers, kcsan: Use generic instrumentation for non-smp barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 19/25] x86/qspinlock, kcsan: Instrument barrier of pv_queued_spin_unlock() Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 20/25] mm, kcsan: Enable barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 21/25] sched, kcsan: Enable memory " Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 22/25] objtool, kcsan: Add memory barrier instrumentation to whitelist Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 23/25] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 24/25] compiler_attributes.h: Add __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v3 25/25] kcsan: Support WEAK_MEMORY with Clang where no objtool support exists Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ya2Zpf8qpgDYiGqM@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).