linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] gpiolib: check the 'ngpios' property in core gpiolib code
Date: Thu,  2 Dec 2021 14:40:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211202134034.14048-2-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202134034.14048-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

Several drivers read the 'ngpios' device property on their own, but
since it's defined as a standard GPIO property in the device tree bindings
anyway, it's a good candidate for generalization. If the driver didn't
set its gc->ngpio, try to read the 'ngpios' property from the GPIO
device's firmware node before bailing out.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
v1 -> v2:
- use device_property_read_u32() instead of fwnode_property_read_u32()
- reverse the error check logic

v2 -> v3:
- don't shadow errors other than -ENODATA in device_property_read_u32()

v3 -> v4:
- also make sure we return -EINVAL when the device 'ngpios' property is
  set to 0 (thanks Andy!)

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index ede8b8a7aa18..bd9b8cb53476 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	int base = gc->base;
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret = 0;
+	u32 ngpios;
 
 	/*
 	 * First: allocate and populate the internal stat container, and
@@ -646,6 +647,26 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 		goto err_free_dev_name;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Try the device properties if the driver didn't supply the number
+	 * of GPIO lines.
+	 */
+	if (gc->ngpio == 0) {
+		ret = device_property_read_u32(&gdev->dev, "ngpios", &ngpios);
+		if (ret == -ENODATA)
+			/*
+			 * -ENODATA means that there is no property found and
+			 * we want to issue the error message to the user.
+			 * Besides that, we want to return different error code
+			 * to state that supplied value is not valid.
+			 * */
+			ngpios = 0;
+		else if (ret)
+			goto err_free_descs;
+
+		gc->ngpio = ngpios;
+	}
+
 	if (gc->ngpio == 0) {
 		chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 13:40 [PATCH v4 1/2] gpiolib: improve coding style for local variables Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-02 13:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2021-12-02 15:37   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] gpiolib: check the 'ngpios' property in core gpiolib code Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 15:48     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-06 15:01   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-06 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] gpiolib: improve coding style for local variables Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211202134034.14048-2-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).