* [RFC PATCH t-kristo-pm] HID: hid_prog_ops can be static
@ 2021-12-04 13:05 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-12-04 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Tissoires; +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel, Tero Kristo
drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c:151:27: warning: symbol 'hid_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c:184:31: warning: symbol 'hid_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: 1995666cad0e ("HID: initial BPF implementation")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
hid-bpf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c b/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c
index 8792cb5eacd20..fd12a2059d66f 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-bpf.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int hid_bpf_prog_query(struct hid_device *hdev, const union bpf_attr *att
}
-const struct bpf_prog_ops hid_prog_ops = {
+static const struct bpf_prog_ops hid_prog_ops = {
};
static const struct bpf_func_proto *
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static bool hid_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
return true;
}
-const struct bpf_verifier_ops hid_verifier_ops = {
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops hid_verifier_ops = {
.get_func_proto = hid_func_proto,
.is_valid_access = hid_is_valid_access
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-12-04 13:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-04 13:05 [RFC PATCH t-kristo-pm] HID: hid_prog_ops can be static kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).