linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 1/2] sched/cputime: Fix getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD) with nohz_full
@ 2021-12-13 14:20 Sasha Levin
  2021-12-13 14:20 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 2/2] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT_NOFILE Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2021-12-13 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Hasegawa Hitomi, Thomas Gleixner,
	Masayoshi Mizuma, Phil Auld, Sasha Levin, mingo, peterz,
	juri.lelli, vincent.guittot

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit e7f2be115f0746b969c0df14c0d182f65f005ca5 ]

getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD) with nohz_full may return shorter utime/stime
than the actual time.

task_cputime_adjusted() snapshots utime and stime and then adjust their
sum to match the scheduler maintained cputime.sum_exec_runtime.
Unfortunately in nohz_full, sum_exec_runtime is only updated once per
second in the worst case, causing a discrepancy against utime and stime
that can be updated anytime by the reader using vtime.

To fix this situation, perform an update of cputime.sum_exec_runtime
when the cputime snapshot reports the task as actually running while
the tick is disabled. The related overhead is then contained within the
relevant situations.

Reported-by: Hasegawa Hitomi <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hasegawa Hitomi <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026141055.57358-3-frederic@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/sched/cputime.h |  5 +++--
 kernel/sched/cputime.c        | 12 +++++++++---
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched/cputime.h b/include/linux/sched/cputime.h
index 6c9f19a33865a..ce3c58286062c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/cputime.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/cputime.h
@@ -18,15 +18,16 @@
 #endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
-extern void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t,
+extern bool task_cputime(struct task_struct *t,
 			 u64 *utime, u64 *stime);
 extern u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t);
 #else
-static inline void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t,
+static inline bool task_cputime(struct task_struct *t,
 				u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
 {
 	*utime = t->utime;
 	*stime = t->stime;
+	return false;
 }
 
 static inline u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 46ed4e1383e21..a7ebf0d8e369f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -666,7 +666,8 @@ void task_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, u64 *ut, u64 *st)
 		.sum_exec_runtime = p->se.sum_exec_runtime,
 	};
 
-	task_cputime(p, &cputime.utime, &cputime.stime);
+	if (task_cputime(p, &cputime.utime, &cputime.stime))
+		cputime.sum_exec_runtime = task_sched_runtime(p);
 	cputime_adjust(&cputime, &p->prev_cputime, ut, st);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_cputime_adjusted);
@@ -859,19 +860,21 @@ u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t)
  * add up the pending nohz execution time since the last
  * cputime snapshot.
  */
-void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
+bool task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
 {
 	struct vtime *vtime = &t->vtime;
 	unsigned int seq;
 	u64 delta;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!vtime_accounting_enabled()) {
 		*utime = t->utime;
 		*stime = t->stime;
-		return;
+		return false;
 	}
 
 	do {
+		ret = false;
 		seq = read_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
 
 		*utime = t->utime;
@@ -881,6 +884,7 @@ void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
 		if (vtime->state == VTIME_INACTIVE || is_idle_task(t))
 			continue;
 
+		ret = true;
 		delta = vtime_delta(vtime);
 
 		/*
@@ -892,5 +896,7 @@ void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
 		else if (vtime->state == VTIME_SYS)
 			*stime += vtime->stime + delta;
 	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&vtime->seqcount, seq));
+
+	return ret;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN */
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 2/2] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT_NOFILE
  2021-12-13 14:20 [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 1/2] sched/cputime: Fix getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD) with nohz_full Sasha Levin
@ 2021-12-13 14:20 ` Sasha Levin
  2021-12-13 14:22   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2021-12-13 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov, Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini,
	Sasha Levin, shuah, kvm, linux-kselftest

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 908fa88e420f30dde6d80f092795a18ec72ca6d3 ]

With the elevated 'KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS' value kvm_create_max_vcpus test
may hit RLIMIT_NOFILE limits:

 # ./kvm_create_max_vcpus
 KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: 4096
 KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: 1024
 Testing creating 1024 vCPUs, with IDs 0...1023.
 /dev/kvm not available (errno: 24), skipping test

Adjust RLIMIT_NOFILE limits to make sure KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS fds can be
opened. Note, raising hard limit ('rlim_max') requires CAP_SYS_RESOURCE
capability which is generally not needed to run kvm selftests (but without
raising the limit the test is doomed to fail anyway).

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211123135953.667434-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
[Skip the test if the hard limit can be raised. - Paolo]
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
index 231d79e57774e..cfe75536d8a55 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 
 #include "test_util.h"
 
@@ -43,10 +44,39 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	int kvm_max_vcpu_id = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID);
 	int kvm_max_vcpus = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS);
+	/*
+	 * Number of file descriptors reqired, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS for vCPU fds +
+	 * an arbitrary number for everything else.
+	 */
+	int nr_fds_wanted = kvm_max_vcpus + 100;
+	struct rlimit rl;
 
 	printf("KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: %d\n", kvm_max_vcpu_id);
 	printf("KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: %d\n", kvm_max_vcpus);
 
+	/*
+	 * Check that we're allowed to open nr_fds_wanted file descriptors and
+	 * try raising the limits if needed.
+	 */
+	TEST_ASSERT(!getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl), "getrlimit() failed!");
+
+	if (rl.rlim_cur < nr_fds_wanted) {
+		rl.rlim_cur = nr_fds_wanted;
+		if (rl.rlim_max < nr_fds_wanted) {
+			int old_rlim_max = rl.rlim_max;
+			rl.rlim_max = nr_fds_wanted;
+
+			int r = setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl);
+			if (r < 0) {
+				printf("RLIMIT_NOFILE hard limit is too low (%d, wanted %d)\n",
+				       old_rlim_max, nr_fds_wanted);
+				exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+			}
+		} else {
+			TEST_ASSERT(!setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl), "setrlimit() failed!");
+		}
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Upstream KVM prior to 4.8 does not support KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID.
 	 * Userspace is supposed to use KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS as the maximum ID
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 2/2] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT_NOFILE
  2021-12-13 14:20 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 2/2] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT_NOFILE Sasha Levin
@ 2021-12-13 14:22   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2021-12-13 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin, linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov, Sean Christopherson, shuah, kvm, linux-kselftest

On 12/13/21 15:20, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 908fa88e420f30dde6d80f092795a18ec72ca6d3 ]
> 
> With the elevated 'KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS' value kvm_create_max_vcpus test
> may hit RLIMIT_NOFILE limits:
> 
>   # ./kvm_create_max_vcpus
>   KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: 4096
>   KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: 1024
>   Testing creating 1024 vCPUs, with IDs 0...1023.
>   /dev/kvm not available (errno: 24), skipping test
> 
> Adjust RLIMIT_NOFILE limits to make sure KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS fds can be
> opened. Note, raising hard limit ('rlim_max') requires CAP_SYS_RESOURCE
> capability which is generally not needed to run kvm selftests (but without
> raising the limit the test is doomed to fail anyway).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Message-Id: <20211123135953.667434-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
> [Skip the test if the hard limit can be raised. - Paolo]
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
>   .../selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> index 231d79e57774e..cfe75536d8a55 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>   #include <stdio.h>
>   #include <stdlib.h>
>   #include <string.h>
> +#include <sys/resource.h>
>   
>   #include "test_util.h"
>   
> @@ -43,10 +44,39 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   {
>   	int kvm_max_vcpu_id = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID);
>   	int kvm_max_vcpus = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS);
> +	/*
> +	 * Number of file descriptors reqired, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS for vCPU fds +
> +	 * an arbitrary number for everything else.
> +	 */
> +	int nr_fds_wanted = kvm_max_vcpus + 100;
> +	struct rlimit rl;
>   
>   	printf("KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: %d\n", kvm_max_vcpu_id);
>   	printf("KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: %d\n", kvm_max_vcpus);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Check that we're allowed to open nr_fds_wanted file descriptors and
> +	 * try raising the limits if needed.
> +	 */
> +	TEST_ASSERT(!getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl), "getrlimit() failed!");
> +
> +	if (rl.rlim_cur < nr_fds_wanted) {
> +		rl.rlim_cur = nr_fds_wanted;
> +		if (rl.rlim_max < nr_fds_wanted) {
> +			int old_rlim_max = rl.rlim_max;
> +			rl.rlim_max = nr_fds_wanted;
> +
> +			int r = setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl);
> +			if (r < 0) {
> +				printf("RLIMIT_NOFILE hard limit is too low (%d, wanted %d)\n",
> +				       old_rlim_max, nr_fds_wanted);
> +				exit(KSFT_SKIP);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			TEST_ASSERT(!setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl), "setrlimit() failed!");
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Upstream KVM prior to 4.8 does not support KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID.
>   	 * Userspace is supposed to use KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS as the maximum ID
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-13 14:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-13 14:20 [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 1/2] sched/cputime: Fix getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD) with nohz_full Sasha Levin
2021-12-13 14:20 ` [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.4 2/2] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT_NOFILE Sasha Levin
2021-12-13 14:22   ` Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).