linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler
@ 2021-12-13  6:10 Neeraj Upadhyay
  2021-12-13 11:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neeraj Upadhyay @ 2021-12-13  6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, josh, rostedt, mathieu.desnoyers, jiangshanlai, joel
  Cc: rcu, linux-kernel, urezki, frederic, boqun.feng, Neeraj Upadhyay

For PREEMPT_RCU, the rcu_exp_handler() function checks
whether the current CPU is in idle, by calling
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). However, rcu_exp_handler()
is called in IPI handler context. So, it should be checking
the idle context using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). Fix this
by using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() instead of
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). Non-preempt configuration
already uses the correct check.

Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 237a79989aba..1568c8ef185b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
 	 */
 	if (!depth) {
 		if (!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK)) ||
-		    rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
+		    rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
 			rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
 		} else {
 			WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler
  2021-12-13  6:10 [PATCH] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler Neeraj Upadhyay
@ 2021-12-13 11:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
  2021-12-13 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2021-12-13 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neeraj Upadhyay
  Cc: paulmck, josh, rostedt, mathieu.desnoyers, jiangshanlai, joel,
	rcu, linux-kernel, urezki, boqun.feng

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> For PREEMPT_RCU, the rcu_exp_handler() function checks
> whether the current CPU is in idle, by calling
> rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). However, rcu_exp_handler()
> is called in IPI handler context. So, it should be checking
> the idle context using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). Fix this
> by using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() instead of
> rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). Non-preempt configuration
> already uses the correct check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>


> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index 237a79989aba..1568c8ef185b 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
>  	 */
>  	if (!depth) {
>  		if (!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK)) ||
> -		    rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
> +		    rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
>  			rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
>  		} else {
>  			WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler
  2021-12-13 11:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2021-12-13 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2021-12-13 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frederic Weisbecker
  Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay, josh, rostedt, mathieu.desnoyers, jiangshanlai,
	joel, rcu, linux-kernel, urezki, boqun.feng

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:34:55PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:40:24AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> > For PREEMPT_RCU, the rcu_exp_handler() function checks
> > whether the current CPU is in idle, by calling
> > rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). However, rcu_exp_handler()
> > is called in IPI handler context. So, it should be checking
> > the idle context using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). Fix this
> > by using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() instead of
> > rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). Non-preempt configuration
> > already uses the correct check.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Queued for further review and testing, thank you both!

							Thanx, Paul

> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> > index 237a79989aba..1568c8ef185b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> > @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (!depth) {
> >  		if (!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK)) ||
> > -		    rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
> > +		    rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
> >  			rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
> >  		} else {
> >  			WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-13 19:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-13  6:10 [PATCH] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-12-13 11:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-13 19:20   ` Paul E. McKenney

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).