* [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/11] kernel: Implement try_module_get_live [not found] <20220102162115.1506833-1-memxor@gmail.com> @ 2022-01-02 16:21 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2022-01-25 18:50 ` Luis Chamberlain 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-01-02 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, netdev, netfilter-devel Cc: Luis Chamberlain, Jessica Yu, linux-kernel, linux-modules, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Refactor shared functionality between strong_try_module_get and try_module_get into a common helper, and expose try_module_get_live that returns a bool similar to try_module_get. It will be used in the next patch for btf_try_get_module, to eliminate a race between module __init function invocation and module_put from BPF side. Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> --- include/linux/module.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/module.c | 20 ++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index c9f1200b2312..eb83aaeaa76e 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -608,17 +608,17 @@ void symbol_put_addr(void *addr); /* Sometimes we know we already have a refcount, and it's easier not to handle the error case (which only happens with rmmod --wait). */ extern void __module_get(struct module *module); - -/* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed, - * so pretend it's not there. */ -extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module); - +extern int __try_module_get(struct module *module, bool strong); extern void module_put(struct module *module); #else /*!CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD*/ -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module) +static inline int __try_module_get(struct module *module, bool strong) { - return !module || module_is_live(module); + if (module && !module_is_live(module)) + return -ENOENT; + if (strong && module && module->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING) + return -EBUSY; + return 0; } static inline void module_put(struct module *module) { @@ -631,6 +631,18 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module) #endif /* CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD */ +/* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed, + * so pretend it's not there. */ +static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module) +{ + return !__try_module_get(module, false); +} +/* Only take reference for modules which have fully initialized */ +static inline bool try_module_get_live(struct module *module) +{ + return !__try_module_get(module, true); +} + /* This is a #define so the string doesn't get put in every .o file */ #define module_name(mod) \ ({ \ diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c index 84a9141a5e15..a9bb0a5576c8 100644 --- a/kernel/module.c +++ b/kernel/module.c @@ -318,12 +318,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_module_notifier); static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod) { BUG_ON(mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED); - if (mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING) - return -EBUSY; - if (try_module_get(mod)) - return 0; - else - return -ENOENT; + return __try_module_get(mod, true); } static inline void add_taint_module(struct module *mod, unsigned flag, @@ -1066,24 +1061,25 @@ void __module_get(struct module *module) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get); -bool try_module_get(struct module *module) +int __try_module_get(struct module *module, bool strong) { - bool ret = true; + int ret = 0; if (module) { preempt_disable(); + if (strong && module->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING) + ret = -EBUSY; /* Note: here, we can fail to get a reference */ - if (likely(module_is_live(module) && + else if (likely(module_is_live(module) && atomic_inc_not_zero(&module->refcnt) != 0)) trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_); else - ret = false; - + ret = -ENOENT; preempt_enable(); } return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__try_module_get); void module_put(struct module *module) { -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/11] kernel: Implement try_module_get_live 2022-01-02 16:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/11] kernel: Implement try_module_get_live Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-01-25 18:50 ` Luis Chamberlain 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Luis Chamberlain @ 2022-01-25 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, netdev, netfilter-devel, Jessica Yu, linux-kernel, linux-modules, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 09:51:05PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > Refactor shared functionality between strong_try_module_get and > try_module_get into a common helper, and expose try_module_get_live > that returns a bool similar to try_module_get. > > It will be used in the next patch for btf_try_get_module, to eliminate a > race between module __init function invocation and module_put from BPF > side. > > Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> > Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > --- > include/linux/module.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- > kernel/module.c | 20 ++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h > index c9f1200b2312..eb83aaeaa76e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/module.h > +++ b/include/linux/module.h > @@ -608,17 +608,17 @@ void symbol_put_addr(void *addr); > /* Sometimes we know we already have a refcount, and it's easier not > to handle the error case (which only happens with rmmod --wait). */ > extern void __module_get(struct module *module); > - > -/* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed, > - * so pretend it's not there. */ > -extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module); > - > +extern int __try_module_get(struct module *module, bool strong); > extern void module_put(struct module *module); > > #else /*!CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD*/ > -static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module) > +static inline int __try_module_get(struct module *module, bool strong) > { > - return !module || module_is_live(module); > + if (module && !module_is_live(module)) > + return -ENOENT; > + if (strong && module && module->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING) > + return -EBUSY; > + return 0; > } The bool return is clear here before on try_module_get(). > static inline void module_put(struct module *module) > { > @@ -631,6 +631,18 @@ static inline void __module_get(struct module *module) > > #endif /* CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD */ > > +/* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed, > + * so pretend it's not there. */ > +static inline bool try_module_get(struct module *module) > +{ > + return !__try_module_get(module, false); Now you're making it negate an int return... > +} > +/* Only take reference for modules which have fully initialized */ > +static inline bool try_module_get_live(struct module *module) > +{ > + return !__try_module_get(module, true); > +} > + > /* This is a #define so the string doesn't get put in every .o file */ > #define module_name(mod) \ > ({ \ > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c > index 84a9141a5e15..a9bb0a5576c8 100644 > --- a/kernel/module.c > +++ b/kernel/module.c > @@ -318,12 +318,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_module_notifier); > static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod) > { > BUG_ON(mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED); > - if (mod && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING) > - return -EBUSY; > - if (try_module_get(mod)) > - return 0; > - else > - return -ENOENT; Before this change, this check had no disabled preemption prior to the first branch, now we are having it moved with preemption disabled. That's an OK change, but it is a small functional change. Because of these two things NACK on this patch for now. Please split the patch up if you intend to make a new functional change. And this patch should be easy to read, this is not. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-25 18:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220102162115.1506833-1-memxor@gmail.com>
2022-01-02 16:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/11] kernel: Implement try_module_get_live Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-25 18:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).