linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [rt-devel:linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase 102/127] kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'?
@ 2022-01-08  9:32 kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-01-08  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Minchan Kim; +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase
head:   a6be65cb880860db356744acca5d49bf43ac0e94
commit: a80864a2a62f4fc6fd4061092d0996ef870d7a9d [102/127] locking/rwlocks: introduce write_lock_nested
config: sparc64-randconfig-p002-20220107 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220108/202201081743.6XKFffqI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git/commit/?id=a80864a2a62f4fc6fd4061092d0996ef870d7a9d
        git remote add rt-devel https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git
        git fetch --no-tags rt-devel linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase
        git checkout a80864a2a62f4fc6fd4061092d0996ef870d7a9d
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=sparc64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      68 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock)                   \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      80 | unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock)  \
         |                          ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      98 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock)               \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     103 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock)                \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      68 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock)                   \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      80 | unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock)  \
         |                          ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      98 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock)               \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     103 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock)                \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      68 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock)                   \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      80 | unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock)  \
         |                          ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
      98 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock)               \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     103 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock)                \
         |                 ^~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS'
     130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/spinlock.c: In function '_raw_write_lock_nested':
>> kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     306 |         __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         _raw_write_lock_nested
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +306 kernel/locking/spinlock.c

   303	
   304	void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *lock, int subclass)
   305	{
 > 306		__raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass);
   307	}
   308	EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_write_lock_nested);
   309	#endif
   310	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-01-08  9:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-08  9:32 [rt-devel:linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase 102/127] kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'? kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).