input: ps2-gpio: use ktime for IRQ timekeeping

input: ps2-gpio: use ktime for IRQ timekeeping

[Danilo Krummrich]

This patch series implements the usage of ktime for IRQ timekeeping to
overcome:

(1) The resolution limitations of jiffies.
(2) Potential spurious IRQs generated by gpio controllers.

Besides that, based on the newly implemented timekeeping, it fixes a wrongly
suspected extra clock cycle for TX transfers and a race condition when
starting an immediate TX transfer based on data received from an RX transfer.

[PATCH 1/3] input: ps2-gpio: use ktime for IRQ timekeeping

[Danilo Krummrich]

Using jiffies for the IRQ timekeeping is not sufficient for two reasons:

(1) Usually jiffies have a resolution of 1ms to 10ms. The IRQ intervals
    based on the clock frequency of PS2 protocol specification (10kHz -
    16.7kHz) are between ~60us and 100us only. Therefore only those IRQ
    intervals can be detected which are either at the end of a transfer
    or are overly delayed. While this is sufficient in most cases, since
    we have quite a lot of ways to detect faulty transfers, it can
    produce false positives in rare cases: When the jiffies value
    changes right between two interrupt that are in time, we wrongly
    assume that we missed one or more clock cycles.

(2) Some gpio controllers (e.g. the one in the bcm283x chips) may generate
    spurious IRQs when processing interrupts in the frequency given by PS2
    devices.

Both issues can be fixed by using ktime resolution for IRQ timekeeping.

However, it is still possible to miss clock cycles without detecting
them. When the PS2 device generates the falling edge of the clock signal
we have between ~30us and 50us to sample the data line, because after
this time we reach the next rising edge at which the device changes the
data signal already. But, the only thing we can detect is whether the
IRQ interval is within the given period. Therefore it is possible to
have an IRQ latency greater than ~30us to 50us, sample the wrong bit on
the data line and still be on time with the next IRQ. However, this can
only happen when within a given transfer the IRQ latency increases
slowly.

___            ______            ______            ______            ___
   \          /      \          /      \          /      \          /
    \        /        \        /        \        /        \        /
     \______/          \______/          \______/          \______/

    |-----------------|                 |--------|
         60us/100us                      30us/50us

Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@dk-develop.de>
---
 drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
index 8970b49ea09a..7fef4176bdd1 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
 
 #define DRIVER_NAME		"ps2-gpio"
 
@@ -44,6 +45,29 @@
 
 #define PS2_CMD_RESEND		0xfe
 
+/* The PS2 protocol specifies a clock frequency between 10kHz and 16.7kHz,
+ * therefore the maximal interrupt interval should be 100us and the minimum
+ * interrupt interval should be ~60us. Let's allow +/- 20us for frequency
+ * deviations and interrupt latency.
+ *
+ * The data line must be samples after ~30us to 50us after the falling edge,
+ * since the device updates the data line at the rising edge.
+ *
+ * ___            ______            ______            ______            ___
+ *    \          /      \          /      \          /      \          /
+ *     \        /        \        /        \        /        \        /
+ *      \______/          \______/          \______/          \______/
+ *
+ *     |-----------------|                 |--------|
+ *          60us/100us                      30us/50us
+ */
+#define PS2_CLK_FREQ_MIN_HZ		10000
+#define PS2_CLK_FREQ_MAX_HZ		16700
+#define PS2_CLK_MIN_INTERVAL_US		((1000 * 1000) / PS2_CLK_FREQ_MAX_HZ)
+#define PS2_CLK_MAX_INTERVAL_US		((1000 * 1000) / PS2_CLK_FREQ_MIN_HZ)
+#define PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US		(PS2_CLK_MIN_INTERVAL_US - 20)
+#define PS2_IRQ_MAX_INTERVAL_US		(PS2_CLK_MAX_INTERVAL_US + 20)
+
 struct ps2_gpio_data {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct serio *serio;
@@ -59,6 +83,8 @@ struct ps2_gpio_data {
 	struct completion tx_done;
 	struct mutex tx_mutex;
 	struct delayed_work tx_work;
+	ktime_t tx_start;
+	ktime_t tx_end;
 };
 
 static int ps2_gpio_open(struct serio *serio)
@@ -118,6 +144,7 @@ static void ps2_gpio_tx_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 						    struct ps2_gpio_data,
 						    tx_work);
 
+	drvdata->tx_start = ktime_get();
 	enable_irq(drvdata->irq);
 	gpiod_direction_output(drvdata->gpio_data, 0);
 	gpiod_direction_input(drvdata->gpio_clk);
@@ -128,20 +155,33 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 	unsigned char byte, cnt;
 	int data;
 	int rxflags = 0;
-	static unsigned long old_jiffies;
+	static ktime_t t_last, t_now;
+	s64 us_delta;
 
 	byte = drvdata->rx_byte;
 	cnt = drvdata->rx_cnt;
 
-	if (old_jiffies == 0)
-		old_jiffies = jiffies;
+	t_now = ktime_get();
+	if (t_last == 0)
+		t_last = t_now;
 
-	if ((jiffies - old_jiffies) > usecs_to_jiffies(100)) {
+	/* We need to consider spurious interrupts happening right after a TX xfer
+	 * finished.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(ktime_us_delta(t_now, drvdata->tx_end) <
+		     PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US))
+		goto end;
+
+	us_delta = ktime_us_delta(t_now, t_last);
+	if (us_delta > PS2_IRQ_MAX_INTERVAL_US && cnt) {
 		dev_err(drvdata->dev,
 			"RX: timeout, probably we missed an interrupt\n");
 		goto err;
+	} else if (us_delta < PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US && t_now != t_last) {
+		/* Ignore spurious IRQs. */
+		goto end;
 	}
-	old_jiffies = jiffies;
+	t_last = t_now;
 
 	data = gpiod_get_value(drvdata->gpio_data);
 	if (unlikely(data < 0)) {
@@ -205,7 +245,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 			goto err;
 		}
 		cnt = byte = 0;
-		old_jiffies = 0;
+
 		goto end; /* success */
 	default:
 		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "RX: got out of sync with the device\n");
@@ -217,7 +257,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 
 err:
 	cnt = byte = 0;
-	old_jiffies = 0;
 	__ps2_gpio_write(drvdata->serio, PS2_CMD_RESEND);
 end:
 	drvdata->rx_cnt = cnt;
@@ -229,20 +268,34 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 {
 	unsigned char byte, cnt;
 	int data;
-	static unsigned long old_jiffies;
+	static ktime_t t_last, t_now;
+	s64 us_delta;
 
 	cnt = drvdata->tx_cnt;
 	byte = drvdata->tx_byte;
 
-	if (old_jiffies == 0)
-		old_jiffies = jiffies;
+	t_now = ktime_get();
+	if (t_last == 0)
+		t_last = t_now;
+
+	/* There might be pending IRQs since we disabled IRQs in __ps2_gpio_write().
+	 * We can expect at least one clock period until the device generates the
+	 * first falling edge after releasing the clock line.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(ktime_us_delta(t_now, drvdata->tx_start) <
+		     PS2_CLK_MIN_INTERVAL_US))
+		goto end;
 
-	if ((jiffies - old_jiffies) > usecs_to_jiffies(100)) {
+	us_delta = ktime_us_delta(t_now, t_last);
+	if (us_delta > PS2_IRQ_MAX_INTERVAL_US && cnt > 1) {
 		dev_err(drvdata->dev,
 			"TX: timeout, probably we missed an interrupt\n");
 		goto err;
+	} else if (us_delta < PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US && t_now != t_last) {
+		/* Ignore spurious IRQs. */
+		goto end;
 	}
-	old_jiffies = jiffies;
+	t_last = t_now;
 
 	switch (cnt) {
 	case PS2_START_BIT:
@@ -283,11 +336,11 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 			goto err;
 		}
 
+		drvdata->tx_end = ktime_get();
 		drvdata->mode = PS2_MODE_RX;
 		complete(&drvdata->tx_done);
 
 		cnt = 1;
-		old_jiffies = 0;
 		goto end; /* success */
 	default:
 		/* Probably we missed the stop bit. Therefore we release data
@@ -303,7 +356,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 
 err:
 	cnt = 1;
-	old_jiffies = 0;
 	gpiod_direction_input(drvdata->gpio_data);
 	__ps2_gpio_write(drvdata->serio, drvdata->tx_byte);
 end:
@@ -399,6 +451,7 @@ static int ps2_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	drvdata->serio = serio;
 	drvdata->dev = dev;
 	drvdata->mode = PS2_MODE_RX;
+	drvdata->tx_end = 0;
 
 	/* Tx count always starts at 1, as the start bit is sent implicitly by
 	 * host-to-device communication initialization.
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 2/3] input: ps2-gpio: remove tx timeout from ps2_gpio_irq_tx()

[Danilo Krummrich]

Actually, there's no extra clock pulse to wait for.

The assumption of an extra clock pulse was mistakenly derived from the
fact that by the time this driver was introduced the GPIO controller of
the test machine (bcm2835) generated spurious interrupts.

Since now spurious interrupts are handled properly this can and must be
removed in order to make TX xfers work properly.

While at it, remove duplicate gpiod_direction_input(). The data gpio
must already be configured to act as input when receiving the ACK bit.

This patch is tested with the original hardware (peripherals and board)
the driver was developed on.

Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@dk-develop.de>
---
 drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
index 7fef4176bdd1..336928a8a127 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
@@ -37,8 +37,7 @@
 #define PS2_DATA_BIT7		8
 #define PS2_PARITY_BIT		9
 #define PS2_STOP_BIT		10
-#define PS2_TX_TIMEOUT		11
-#define PS2_ACK_BIT		12
+#define PS2_ACK_BIT		11
 
 #define PS2_DEV_RET_ACK		0xfa
 #define PS2_DEV_RET_NACK	0xfe
@@ -323,13 +322,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 		/* release data line to generate stop bit */
 		gpiod_direction_input(drvdata->gpio_data);
 		break;
-	case PS2_TX_TIMEOUT:
-		/* Devices generate one extra clock pulse before sending the
-		 * acknowledgment.
-		 */
-		break;
 	case PS2_ACK_BIT:
-		gpiod_direction_input(drvdata->gpio_data);
 		data = gpiod_get_value(drvdata->gpio_data);
 		if (data) {
 			dev_warn(drvdata->dev, "TX: received NACK, retry\n");
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 3/3] input: ps2-gpio: don't send rx data before the stop bit

[Danilo Krummrich]

Sending the data before processing the stop bit from the device already
saves the data of the current xfer in case the stop bit is missed.

However, when TX xfers are enabled this introduces a race condition when
a peripheral driver using the bus immediately requests a TX xfer from IRQ
context.

Therefore the data must be send after receiving the stop bit, although
it is possible the data is lost when missing the stop bit.

Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@dk-develop.de>
---
 drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
index 336928a8a127..460d520ac865 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
@@ -217,6 +217,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 			if (!drvdata->write_enable)
 				goto err;
 		}
+		break;
+	case PS2_STOP_BIT:
+		/* stop bit should be high */
+		if (unlikely(!data)) {
+			dev_err(drvdata->dev, "RX: stop bit should be high\n");
+			goto err;
+		}
 
 		/* Do not send spurious ACK's and NACK's when write fn is
 		 * not provided.
@@ -228,21 +235,9 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
 				break;
 		}
 
-		/* Let's send the data without waiting for the stop bit to be
-		 * sent. It may happen that we miss the stop bit. When this
-		 * happens we have no way to recover from this, certainly
-		 * missing the parity bit would be recognized when processing
-		 * the stop bit. When missing both, data is lost.
-		 */
 		serio_interrupt(drvdata->serio, byte, rxflags);
 		dev_dbg(drvdata->dev, "RX: sending byte 0x%x\n", byte);
-		break;
-	case PS2_STOP_BIT:
-		/* stop bit should be high */
-		if (unlikely(!data)) {
-			dev_err(drvdata->dev, "RX: stop bit should be high\n");
-			goto err;
-		}
+
 		cnt = byte = 0;
 
 		goto end; /* success */
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 1/3] input: ps2-gpio: use ktime for IRQ timekeeping

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi Danilo,

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:22:56PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Using jiffies for the IRQ timekeeping is not sufficient for two reasons:
> 
> (1) Usually jiffies have a resolution of 1ms to 10ms. The IRQ intervals
>     based on the clock frequency of PS2 protocol specification (10kHz -
>     16.7kHz) are between ~60us and 100us only. Therefore only those IRQ
>     intervals can be detected which are either at the end of a transfer
>     or are overly delayed. While this is sufficient in most cases, since
>     we have quite a lot of ways to detect faulty transfers, it can
>     produce false positives in rare cases: When the jiffies value
>     changes right between two interrupt that are in time, we wrongly
>     assume that we missed one or more clock cycles.
> 
> (2) Some gpio controllers (e.g. the one in the bcm283x chips) may generate
>     spurious IRQs when processing interrupts in the frequency given by PS2
>     devices.
> 
> Both issues can be fixed by using ktime resolution for IRQ timekeeping.
> 
> However, it is still possible to miss clock cycles without detecting
> them. When the PS2 device generates the falling edge of the clock signal
> we have between ~30us and 50us to sample the data line, because after
> this time we reach the next rising edge at which the device changes the
> data signal already. But, the only thing we can detect is whether the
> IRQ interval is within the given period. Therefore it is possible to
> have an IRQ latency greater than ~30us to 50us, sample the wrong bit on
> the data line and still be on time with the next IRQ. However, this can
> only happen when within a given transfer the IRQ latency increases
> slowly.
> 
> ___            ______            ______            ______            ___
>    \          /      \          /      \          /      \          /
>     \        /        \        /        \        /        \        /
>      \______/          \______/          \______/          \______/
> 
>     |-----------------|                 |--------|
>          60us/100us                      30us/50us
> 
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <danilokrummrich@dk-develop.de>
> ---
>  drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
> index 8970b49ea09a..7fef4176bdd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/ps2-gpio.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
>  
>  #define DRIVER_NAME		"ps2-gpio"
>  
> @@ -44,6 +45,29 @@
>  
>  #define PS2_CMD_RESEND		0xfe
>  
> +/* The PS2 protocol specifies a clock frequency between 10kHz and 16.7kHz,
> + * therefore the maximal interrupt interval should be 100us and the minimum
> + * interrupt interval should be ~60us. Let's allow +/- 20us for frequency
> + * deviations and interrupt latency.
> + *
> + * The data line must be samples after ~30us to 50us after the falling edge,
> + * since the device updates the data line at the rising edge.
> + *
> + * ___            ______            ______            ______            ___
> + *    \          /      \          /      \          /      \          /
> + *     \        /        \        /        \        /        \        /
> + *      \______/          \______/          \______/          \______/
> + *
> + *     |-----------------|                 |--------|
> + *          60us/100us                      30us/50us
> + */
> +#define PS2_CLK_FREQ_MIN_HZ		10000
> +#define PS2_CLK_FREQ_MAX_HZ		16700
> +#define PS2_CLK_MIN_INTERVAL_US		((1000 * 1000) / PS2_CLK_FREQ_MAX_HZ)
> +#define PS2_CLK_MAX_INTERVAL_US		((1000 * 1000) / PS2_CLK_FREQ_MIN_HZ)
> +#define PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US		(PS2_CLK_MIN_INTERVAL_US - 20)
> +#define PS2_IRQ_MAX_INTERVAL_US		(PS2_CLK_MAX_INTERVAL_US + 20)
> +
>  struct ps2_gpio_data {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct serio *serio;
> @@ -59,6 +83,8 @@ struct ps2_gpio_data {
>  	struct completion tx_done;
>  	struct mutex tx_mutex;
>  	struct delayed_work tx_work;
> +	ktime_t tx_start;
> +	ktime_t tx_end;
>  };
>  
>  static int ps2_gpio_open(struct serio *serio)
> @@ -118,6 +144,7 @@ static void ps2_gpio_tx_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  						    struct ps2_gpio_data,
>  						    tx_work);
>  
> +	drvdata->tx_start = ktime_get();
>  	enable_irq(drvdata->irq);
>  	gpiod_direction_output(drvdata->gpio_data, 0);
>  	gpiod_direction_input(drvdata->gpio_clk);
> @@ -128,20 +155,33 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
>  	unsigned char byte, cnt;
>  	int data;
>  	int rxflags = 0;
> -	static unsigned long old_jiffies;
> +	static ktime_t t_last, t_now;
> +	s64 us_delta;
>  
>  	byte = drvdata->rx_byte;
>  	cnt = drvdata->rx_cnt;
>  
> -	if (old_jiffies == 0)
> -		old_jiffies = jiffies;
> +	t_now = ktime_get();
> +	if (t_last == 0)

Instead of checking this every time, do you think we could seed the
value in ps2_gpio_open() (and also make it per-port, not static)?

> +		t_last = t_now;
>  
> -	if ((jiffies - old_jiffies) > usecs_to_jiffies(100)) {
> +	/* We need to consider spurious interrupts happening right after a TX xfer
> +	 * finished.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(ktime_us_delta(t_now, drvdata->tx_end) <
> +		     PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US))
> +		goto end;
> +
> +	us_delta = ktime_us_delta(t_now, t_last);
> +	if (us_delta > PS2_IRQ_MAX_INTERVAL_US && cnt) {
>  		dev_err(drvdata->dev,
>  			"RX: timeout, probably we missed an interrupt\n");
>  		goto err;
> +	} else if (us_delta < PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US && t_now != t_last) {
> +		/* Ignore spurious IRQs. */
> +		goto end;
>  	}
> -	old_jiffies = jiffies;
> +	t_last = t_now;
>  
>  	data = gpiod_get_value(drvdata->gpio_data);
>  	if (unlikely(data < 0)) {
> @@ -205,7 +245,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
>  			goto err;
>  		}
>  		cnt = byte = 0;
> -		old_jiffies = 0;
> +
>  		goto end; /* success */
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(drvdata->dev, "RX: got out of sync with the device\n");
> @@ -217,7 +257,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
>  
>  err:
>  	cnt = byte = 0;
> -	old_jiffies = 0;
>  	__ps2_gpio_write(drvdata->serio, PS2_CMD_RESEND);
>  end:
>  	drvdata->rx_cnt = cnt;
> @@ -229,20 +268,34 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
>  {
>  	unsigned char byte, cnt;
>  	int data;
> -	static unsigned long old_jiffies;
> +	static ktime_t t_last, t_now;
> +	s64 us_delta;
>  
>  	cnt = drvdata->tx_cnt;
>  	byte = drvdata->tx_byte;
>  
> -	if (old_jiffies == 0)
> -		old_jiffies = jiffies;
> +	t_now = ktime_get();
> +	if (t_last == 0)
> +		t_last = t_now;
> +
> +	/* There might be pending IRQs since we disabled IRQs in __ps2_gpio_write().
> +	 * We can expect at least one clock period until the device generates the
> +	 * first falling edge after releasing the clock line.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(ktime_us_delta(t_now, drvdata->tx_start) <
> +		     PS2_CLK_MIN_INTERVAL_US))
> +		goto end;
>  
> -	if ((jiffies - old_jiffies) > usecs_to_jiffies(100)) {
> +	us_delta = ktime_us_delta(t_now, t_last);
> +	if (us_delta > PS2_IRQ_MAX_INTERVAL_US && cnt > 1) {
>  		dev_err(drvdata->dev,
>  			"TX: timeout, probably we missed an interrupt\n");
>  		goto err;
> +	} else if (us_delta < PS2_IRQ_MIN_INTERVAL_US && t_now != t_last) {
> +		/* Ignore spurious IRQs. */
> +		goto end;
>  	}
> -	old_jiffies = jiffies;
> +	t_last = t_now;
>  
>  	switch (cnt) {
>  	case PS2_START_BIT:
> @@ -283,11 +336,11 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
>  			goto err;
>  		}
>  
> +		drvdata->tx_end = ktime_get();
>  		drvdata->mode = PS2_MODE_RX;
>  		complete(&drvdata->tx_done);
>  
>  		cnt = 1;
> -		old_jiffies = 0;
>  		goto end; /* success */
>  	default:
>  		/* Probably we missed the stop bit. Therefore we release data
> @@ -303,7 +356,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_tx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
>  
>  err:
>  	cnt = 1;
> -	old_jiffies = 0;
>  	gpiod_direction_input(drvdata->gpio_data);
>  	__ps2_gpio_write(drvdata->serio, drvdata->tx_byte);
>  end:
> @@ -399,6 +451,7 @@ static int ps2_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	drvdata->serio = serio;
>  	drvdata->dev = dev;
>  	drvdata->mode = PS2_MODE_RX;
> +	drvdata->tx_end = 0;
>  
>  	/* Tx count always starts at 1, as the start bit is sent implicitly by
>  	 * host-to-device communication initialization.
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH 1/3] input: ps2-gpio: use ktime for IRQ timekeeping

[Danilo Krummrich]

Hi Dmitry,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:14:24PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Danilo,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:22:56PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > @@ -128,20 +155,33 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_gpio_irq_rx(struct ps2_gpio_data *drvdata)
> >  	unsigned char byte, cnt;
> >  	int data;
> >  	int rxflags = 0;
> > -	static unsigned long old_jiffies;
> > +	static ktime_t t_last, t_now;
> > +	s64 us_delta;
> >  
> >  	byte = drvdata->rx_byte;
> >  	cnt = drvdata->rx_cnt;
> >  
> > -	if (old_jiffies == 0)
> > -		old_jiffies = jiffies;
> > +	t_now = ktime_get();
> > +	if (t_last == 0)
> 
> Instead of checking this every time, do you think we could seed the
> value in ps2_gpio_open() (and also make it per-port, not static)?
Oops! Sure, I'll send a v2.

I will also add another patch to refactor struct ps2_gpio_data to clearly
separate rx and tx state data, otherwise it might start to become a bit messy.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry

- Danilo