linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	<brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<marcorr@google.com>,
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 32/46] x86/compressed/64: Add support for SEV-SNP CPUID table in #VC handlers
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:33:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220307213356.2797205-33-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220307213356.2797205-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>

CPUID instructions generate a #VC exception for SEV-ES/SEV-SNP guests,
for which early handlers are currently set up to handle. In the case
of SEV-SNP, guests can use a configurable location in guest memory
that has been pre-populated with a firmware-validated CPUID table to
look up the relevant CPUID values rather than requesting them from
hypervisor via a VMGEXIT. Add the various hooks in the #VC handlers to
allow CPUID instructions to be handled via the table. The code to
actually configure/enable the table will be added in a subsequent
commit.

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h |   2 +
 arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c      | 324 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 326 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
index e9b6815b3b3d..0759af9b1acf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
@@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ struct snp_psc_desc {
 #define GHCB_TERM_PSC			1	/* Page State Change failure */
 #define GHCB_TERM_PVALIDATE		2	/* Pvalidate failure */
 #define GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0		3	/* SNP guest is not running at VMPL-0 */
+#define GHCB_TERM_CPUID			4	/* CPUID-validation failure */
+#define GHCB_TERM_CPUID_HV		5	/* CPUID failure during hypervisor fallback */
 
 #define GHCB_RESP_CODE(v)		((v) & GHCB_MSR_INFO_MASK)
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
index b4d5558c9d0a..0f1375164ff0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
@@ -24,6 +24,36 @@ struct cpuid_leaf {
 	u32 edx;
 };
 
+/*
+ * Individual entries of the SNP CPUID table, as defined by the SNP
+ * Firmware ABI, Revision 0.9, Section 7.1, Table 14.
+ */
+struct snp_cpuid_fn {
+	u32 eax_in;
+	u32 ecx_in;
+	u64 xcr0_in;
+	u64 xss_in;
+	u32 eax;
+	u32 ebx;
+	u32 ecx;
+	u32 edx;
+	u64 __reserved;
+} __packed;
+
+/*
+ * SNP CPUID table, as defined by the SNP Firmware ABI, Revision 0.9,
+ * Section 8.14.2.6. Also noted there is the SNP firmware-enforced limit
+ * of 64 entries per CPUID table.
+ */
+#define SNP_CPUID_COUNT_MAX 64
+
+struct snp_cpuid_table {
+	u32 count;
+	u32 __reserved1;
+	u64 __reserved2;
+	struct snp_cpuid_fn fn[SNP_CPUID_COUNT_MAX];
+} __packed;
+
 /*
  * Since feature negotiation related variables are set early in the boot
  * process they must reside in the .data section so as not to be zeroed
@@ -33,6 +63,19 @@ struct cpuid_leaf {
  */
 static u16 ghcb_version __ro_after_init;
 
+/* Copy of the SNP firmware's CPUID page. */
+static struct snp_cpuid_table cpuid_table_copy __ro_after_init;
+
+/*
+ * These will be initialized based on CPUID table so that non-present
+ * all-zero leaves (for sparse tables) can be differentiated from
+ * invalid/out-of-range leaves. This is needed since all-zero leaves
+ * still need to be post-processed.
+ */
+static u32 cpuid_std_range_max __ro_after_init;
+static u32 cpuid_hyp_range_max __ro_after_init;
+static u32 cpuid_ext_range_max __ro_after_init;
+
 static bool __init sev_es_check_cpu_features(void)
 {
 	if (!has_cpuflag(X86_FEATURE_RDRAND)) {
@@ -242,6 +285,252 @@ static int sev_cpuid_hv(struct cpuid_leaf *leaf)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This may be called early while still running on the initial identity
+ * mapping. Use RIP-relative addressing to obtain the correct address
+ * while running with the initial identity mapping as well as the
+ * switch-over to kernel virtual addresses later.
+ */
+static const struct snp_cpuid_table *snp_cpuid_get_table(void)
+{
+	void *ptr;
+
+	asm ("lea cpuid_table_copy(%%rip), %0"
+	     : "=r" (ptr)
+	     : "p" (&cpuid_table_copy));
+
+	return ptr;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The SNP Firmware ABI, Revision 0.9, Section 7.1, details the use of
+ * XCR0_IN and XSS_IN to encode multiple versions of 0xD subfunctions 0
+ * and 1 based on the corresponding features enabled by a particular
+ * combination of XCR0 and XSS registers so that a guest can look up the
+ * version corresponding to the features currently enabled in its XCR0/XSS
+ * registers. The only values that differ between these versions/table
+ * entries is the enabled XSAVE area size advertised via EBX.
+ *
+ * While hypervisors may choose to make use of this support, it is more
+ * robust/secure for a guest to simply find the entry corresponding to the
+ * base/legacy XSAVE area size (XCR0=1 or XCR0=3), and then calculate the
+ * XSAVE area size using subfunctions 2 through 64, as documented in APM
+ * Volume 3, Rev 3.31, Appendix E.3.8, which is what is done here.
+ *
+ * Since base/legacy XSAVE area size is documented as 0x240, use that value
+ * directly rather than relying on the base size in the CPUID table.
+ *
+ * Return: XSAVE area size on success, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static u32 snp_cpuid_calc_xsave_size(u64 xfeatures_en, bool compacted)
+{
+	const struct snp_cpuid_table *cpuid_table = snp_cpuid_get_table();
+	u64 xfeatures_found = 0;
+	u32 xsave_size = 0x240;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < cpuid_table->count; i++) {
+		const struct snp_cpuid_fn *e = &cpuid_table->fn[i];
+
+		if (!(e->eax_in == 0xD && e->ecx_in > 1 && e->ecx_in < 64))
+			continue;
+		if (!(xfeatures_en & (BIT_ULL(e->ecx_in))))
+			continue;
+		if (xfeatures_found & (BIT_ULL(e->ecx_in)))
+			continue;
+
+		xfeatures_found |= (BIT_ULL(e->ecx_in));
+
+		if (compacted)
+			xsave_size += e->eax;
+		else
+			xsave_size = max(xsave_size, e->eax + e->ebx);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Either the guest set unsupported XCR0/XSS bits, or the corresponding
+	 * entries in the CPUID table were not present. This is not a valid
+	 * state to be in.
+	 */
+	if (xfeatures_found != (xfeatures_en & GENMASK_ULL(63, 2)))
+		return 0;
+
+	return xsave_size;
+}
+
+static bool
+snp_cpuid_get_validated_func(struct cpuid_leaf *leaf)
+{
+	const struct snp_cpuid_table *cpuid_table = snp_cpuid_get_table();
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < cpuid_table->count; i++) {
+		const struct snp_cpuid_fn *e = &cpuid_table->fn[i];
+
+		if (e->eax_in != leaf->fn)
+			continue;
+
+		if (cpuid_function_is_indexed(leaf->fn) && e->ecx_in != leaf->subfn)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * For 0xD subfunctions 0 and 1, only use the entry corresponding
+		 * to the base/legacy XSAVE area size (XCR0=1 or XCR0=3, XSS=0).
+		 * See the comments above snp_cpuid_calc_xsave_size() for more
+		 * details.
+		 */
+		if (e->eax_in == 0xD && (e->ecx_in == 0 || e->ecx_in == 1))
+			if (!(e->xcr0_in == 1 || e->xcr0_in == 3) || e->xss_in)
+				continue;
+
+		leaf->eax = e->eax;
+		leaf->ebx = e->ebx;
+		leaf->ecx = e->ecx;
+		leaf->edx = e->edx;
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void snp_cpuid_hv(struct cpuid_leaf *leaf)
+{
+	if (sev_cpuid_hv(leaf))
+		sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_CPUID_HV);
+}
+
+static int snp_cpuid_postprocess(struct cpuid_leaf *leaf)
+{
+	struct cpuid_leaf leaf_hv = *leaf;
+
+	switch (leaf->fn) {
+	case 0x1:
+		snp_cpuid_hv(&leaf_hv);
+
+		/* initial APIC ID */
+		leaf->ebx = (leaf_hv.ebx & GENMASK(31, 24)) | (leaf->ebx & GENMASK(23, 0));
+		/* APIC enabled bit */
+		leaf->edx = (leaf_hv.edx & BIT(9)) | (leaf->edx & ~BIT(9));
+
+		/* OSXSAVE enabled bit */
+		if (native_read_cr4() & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE)
+			leaf->ecx |= BIT(27);
+		break;
+	case 0x7:
+		/* OSPKE enabled bit */
+		leaf->ecx &= ~BIT(4);
+		if (native_read_cr4() & X86_CR4_PKE)
+			leaf->ecx |= BIT(4);
+		break;
+	case 0xB:
+		leaf_hv.subfn = 0;
+		snp_cpuid_hv(&leaf_hv);
+
+		/* extended APIC ID */
+		leaf->edx = leaf_hv.edx;
+		break;
+	case 0xD: {
+		bool compacted = false;
+		u64 xcr0 = 1, xss = 0;
+		u32 xsave_size;
+
+		if (leaf->subfn != 0 && leaf->subfn != 1)
+			return 0;
+
+		if (native_read_cr4() & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE)
+			xcr0 = xgetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK);
+		if (leaf->subfn == 1) {
+			/* Get XSS value if XSAVES is enabled. */
+			if (leaf->eax & BIT(3)) {
+				unsigned long lo, hi;
+
+				asm volatile("rdmsr" : "=a" (lo), "=d" (hi)
+						     : "c" (MSR_IA32_XSS));
+				xss = (hi << 32) | lo;
+			}
+
+			/*
+			 * The PPR and APM aren't clear on what size should be
+			 * encoded in 0xD:0x1:EBX when compaction is not enabled
+			 * by either XSAVEC (feature bit 1) or XSAVES (feature
+			 * bit 3) since SNP-capable hardware has these feature
+			 * bits fixed as 1. KVM sets it to 0 in this case, but
+			 * to avoid this becoming an issue it's safer to simply
+			 * treat this as unsupported for SNP guests.
+			 */
+			if (!(leaf->eax & (BIT(1) | BIT(3))))
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			compacted = true;
+		}
+
+		xsave_size = snp_cpuid_calc_xsave_size(xcr0 | xss, compacted);
+		if (!xsave_size)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		leaf->ebx = xsave_size;
+		}
+		break;
+	case 0x8000001E:
+		snp_cpuid_hv(&leaf_hv);
+
+		/* extended APIC ID */
+		leaf->eax = leaf_hv.eax;
+		/* compute ID */
+		leaf->ebx = (leaf->ebx & GENMASK(31, 8)) | (leaf_hv.ebx & GENMASK(7, 0));
+		/* node ID */
+		leaf->ecx = (leaf->ecx & GENMASK(31, 8)) | (leaf_hv.ecx & GENMASK(7, 0));
+		break;
+	default:
+		/* No fix-ups needed, use values as-is. */
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns -EOPNOTSUPP if feature not enabled. Any other non-zero return value
+ * should be treated as fatal by caller.
+ */
+static int snp_cpuid(struct cpuid_leaf *leaf)
+{
+	const struct snp_cpuid_table *cpuid_table = snp_cpuid_get_table();
+
+	if (!cpuid_table->count)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (!snp_cpuid_get_validated_func(leaf)) {
+		/*
+		 * Some hypervisors will avoid keeping track of CPUID entries
+		 * where all values are zero, since they can be handled the
+		 * same as out-of-range values (all-zero). This is useful here
+		 * as well as it allows virtually all guest configurations to
+		 * work using a single SNP CPUID table.
+		 *
+		 * To allow for this, there is a need to distinguish between
+		 * out-of-range entries and in-range zero entries, since the
+		 * CPUID table entries are only a template that may need to be
+		 * augmented with additional values for things like
+		 * CPU-specific information during post-processing. So if it's
+		 * not in the table, set the values to zero. Then, if they are
+		 * within a valid CPUID range, proceed with post-processing
+		 * using zeros as the initial values. Otherwise, skip
+		 * post-processing and just return zeros immediately.
+		 */
+		leaf->eax = leaf->ebx = leaf->ecx = leaf->edx = 0;
+
+		/* Skip post-processing for out-of-range zero leafs. */
+		if (!(leaf->fn <= cpuid_std_range_max ||
+		      (leaf->fn >= 0x40000000 && leaf->fn <= cpuid_hyp_range_max) ||
+		      (leaf->fn >= 0x80000000 && leaf->fn <= cpuid_ext_range_max)))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	return snp_cpuid_postprocess(leaf);
+}
+
 /*
  * Boot VC Handler - This is the first VC handler during boot, there is no GHCB
  * page yet, so it only supports the MSR based communication with the
@@ -252,6 +541,7 @@ void __init do_vc_no_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code)
 	unsigned int subfn = lower_bits(regs->cx, 32);
 	unsigned int fn = lower_bits(regs->ax, 32);
 	struct cpuid_leaf leaf;
+	int ret;
 
 	/* Only CPUID is supported via MSR protocol */
 	if (exit_code != SVM_EXIT_CPUID)
@@ -259,9 +549,18 @@ void __init do_vc_no_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code)
 
 	leaf.fn = fn;
 	leaf.subfn = subfn;
+
+	ret = snp_cpuid(&leaf);
+	if (!ret)
+		goto cpuid_done;
+
+	if (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+		goto fail;
+
 	if (sev_cpuid_hv(&leaf))
 		goto fail;
 
+cpuid_done:
 	regs->ax = leaf.eax;
 	regs->bx = leaf.ebx;
 	regs->cx = leaf.ecx;
@@ -556,12 +855,37 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_ioio(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int vc_handle_cpuid_snp(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct cpuid_leaf leaf;
+	int ret;
+
+	leaf.fn = regs->ax;
+	leaf.subfn = regs->cx;
+	ret = snp_cpuid(&leaf);
+	if (!ret) {
+		regs->ax = leaf.eax;
+		regs->bx = leaf.ebx;
+		regs->cx = leaf.ecx;
+		regs->dx = leaf.edx;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static enum es_result vc_handle_cpuid(struct ghcb *ghcb,
 				      struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
 {
 	struct pt_regs *regs = ctxt->regs;
 	u32 cr4 = native_read_cr4();
 	enum es_result ret;
+	int snp_cpuid_ret;
+
+	snp_cpuid_ret = vc_handle_cpuid_snp(regs);
+	if (!snp_cpuid_ret)
+		return ES_OK;
+	if (snp_cpuid_ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+		return ES_VMM_ERROR;
 
 	ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, regs->ax);
 	ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 21:33 [PATCH v12 00/46] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 01/46] KVM: SVM: Define sev_features and vmpl field in the VMSA Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] KVM: SVM: Define sev_features and VMPL " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 02/46] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the SEV-ES save area Brijesh Singh
2022-04-05 18:27   ` [PATCH v12 2.1/46] " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-05 18:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-08  9:09     ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Tom Lendacky
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 03/46] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the GHCB " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Tom Lendacky
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 04/46] KVM: SVM: Update the SEV-ES save area mapping Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Tom Lendacky
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 05/46] x86/boot: Introduce helpers for MSR reads/writes Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 06/46] x86/boot: Use MSR read/write helpers instead of inline assembly Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 07/46] x86/compressed/64: Detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier in boot Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] x86/compressed/64: Detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier during boot tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 08/46] x86/sev: Detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier in boot Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 09/46] x86/mm: Extend cc_attr to include AMD SEV-SNP Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 10/46] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] x86/sev: Define the Linux-specific " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 11/46] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 12/46] x86/sev: Check SEV-SNP features support Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 13/46] x86/sev: Add a helper for the PVALIDATE instruction Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 14/46] x86/sev: Check the vmpl level Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] x86/sev: Check the VMPL level tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 15/46] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 16/46] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 17/46] x86/sev: " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 18/46] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 19/46] x86/kernel: Make the .bss..decrypted section shared in RMP table Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] x86/kernel: Mark the .bss..decrypted section as shared in the " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-06-14  0:46   ` [PATCH v12 19/46] x86/kernel: Make the .bss..decrypted section shared in " Sean Christopherson
2022-06-14 15:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-14 16:01       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-14 16:13         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-14 19:00           ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-14 19:52             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-16 16:17               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-16 16:41                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-01 16:51                   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-07 20:43                     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 20/46] x86/kernel: Validate ROM memory before accessing when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 21/46] x86/mm: Validate memory when changing the C-bit Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 22/46] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs Brijesh Singh
2022-04-05  0:24   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-05 16:20     ` Brijesh Singh
2022-04-05 19:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-08  9:09   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Tom Lendacky
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 23/46] x86/head/64: Re-enable stack protection Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 24/46] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI detection to helper Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 25/46] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI system table lookup " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 26/46] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI config " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 27/46] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI vendor " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 28/46] x86/compressed/acpi: Move EFI kexec handling into common code Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 29/46] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing type to setup_data Brijesh Singh
2022-04-06 21:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-07 14:47     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-07 14:57     ` Brijesh Singh
2022-07-17  5:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 30/46] KVM: x86: Move lookup of indexed CPUID leafs to helper Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 31/46] x86/sev: Move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID " Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2022-03-10 14:51   ` [PATCH v12 32/46] x86/compressed/64: Add support for SEV-SNP CPUID table in #VC handlers Peter Gonda
2022-03-10 21:25     ` Michael Roth
2022-03-11 17:06       ` Joerg Roedel
2022-03-14 17:34         ` Peter Gonda
2022-03-17 13:11           ` Boris Petkov
2022-03-17 20:20             ` Peter Gonda
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 33/46] x86/boot: Add a pointer to Confidential Computing blob in bootparams Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 34/46] x86/compressed: Add SEV-SNP feature detection/setup Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 35/46] x86/compressed: Use firmware-validated CPUID leaves for SEV-SNP guests Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 36/46] x86/compressed: Export and rename add_identity_map() Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 37/46] x86/compressed/64: Add identity mapping for Confidential Computing blob Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 38/46] x86/sev: Add SEV-SNP feature detection/setup Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 39/46] x86/sev: Use firmware-validated CPUID for SEV-SNP guests Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 40/46] x86/sev: add sev=debug cmdline option to dump SNP CPUID table Brijesh Singh
2022-03-25  9:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] x86/sev: Add a sev= cmdline option tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 41/46] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 42/46] x86/sev: Register SEV-SNP guest request platform device Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 43/46] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-04-18 16:42     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-04-18 17:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-18 17:40         ` Tom Lendacky
2022-04-18 21:18           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-24 18:01   ` [PATCH v12 43/46] " Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-24 19:28     ` Peter Gonda
2022-08-25 18:54       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-25 20:09         ` Peter Gonda
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 44/46] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 45/46] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report Brijesh Singh
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2022-03-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v12 46/46] virt: sevguest: Add documentation for SEV-SNP CPUID Enforcement Brijesh Singh
2022-03-14 15:37   ` Peter Gonda
2022-04-08  9:08   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Michael Roth
2022-03-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v12 43.1/46] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver Brijesh Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220307213356.2797205-33-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dovmurik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tobin@ibm.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).